Ann Surg Treat Res.  2023 Oct;105(4):207-218. 10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.207.

Clinical outcome of graft removal versus preservation in abdominal aortic graft infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, USA

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of abdominal aortic graft infection (AGI) treated with removal of the graft vs. graft preservation.
Methods
The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies that reported on AGI were searched. Observational studies and case series of at least 10 cases that reporting on the prevalence, microbiology, and outcomes of AGI were included.
Results
Our search identified 23 studies that met our inclusion criteria, reporting on a total of 873 patients who underwent open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Of these patients, 833 received graft removal, and 40 received graft preservation. The prevalence of AGI was reported to be 1.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5%–1.8%) after OSR and 0.4% (95% CI, 0%–1.1%) after EVAR. The pooled estimates of 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year mortality were 28.7% (95% CI, 19.4%–38.8%), 36.6% (95% CI, 24.6%–49.5%), and 51.8% (95% CI, 38.4%–65.1%) in the graft removal group and 16.1% (95% CI, 4.1%–32.2%), 18.5% (95% CI, 5.7%–35.1%), and 50.0% (95% CI, 31.6%–68.4%) in the graft preservation group. The 30-day mortality rate’s risk ratio (RR) for graft removal vs. preservation was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.40–2.38), while the 1-year mortality rate’s RR was 3.44 (95% CI, 1.60–7.42).
Conclusion
The 30-day mortality rate of AGI treatment was found to be high, whether using graft removal or preservation. In selected patients, implementing antibiotics with graft preservation as an initial management may be helpful in reducing the mortality rate.

Keyword

Prosthesis-related infection; Aortic aneurysm; Device removal; Treatment outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of the literature search for studies that reported mortality of treatment of aortic graft infection.

  • Fig. 2 Risk of bias graph (A) and summary (B) of included studies.

  • Fig. 3 Pooled estimate of prevalence of aortic graft infection after open surgical repair (OSR) or endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). IV, inverse variance; CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom.

  • Fig. 4 Relative risk of 30-day mortality (A) and 1-year mortality (B) of graft removal (experimental) vs. graft preservation (control) in patients with aortic graft infection. RR, risk ratio, CI, confidence interval.


Reference

1. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, et al. Editor’s choice: European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57:8–93. PMID: 30528142.
Article
2. Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, Becquemin JP, van Marrewijk C, Laheij RJ. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the EUROSTAR experience. European Collaborators on Stent/graft techniques for aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 32:739–749. PMID: 11013038.
Article
3. Wilson WR, Bower TC, Creager MA, Amin-Hanjani S, O’Gara PT, Lockhart PB, et al. Vascular graft infections, mycotic aneurysms, and endovascular infections: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 134:e412–e460. PMID: 27737955.
Article
4. Seeger JM. Management of patients with prosthetic vascular graft infection. Am Surg. 2000; 66:166–177. PMID: 10695748.
Article
5. Ducasse E, Calisti A, Speziale F, Rizzo L, Misuraca M, Fiorani P. Aortoiliac stent graft infection: current problems and management. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004; 18:521–526. PMID: 15534730.
Article
6. Schaefers JF, Donas KP, Panuccio G, Kasprzak B, Heine B, Torsello GB, et al. Outcomes of surgical explantation of infected aortic grafts after endovascular and open abdominal aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 57:130–136. PMID: 30146325.
Article
7. Lawrence PF. Conservative treatment of aortic graft infection. Semin Vasc Surg. 2011; 24:199–204. PMID: 22230674.
Article
8. Chakfé N, Diener H, Lejay A, Assadian O, Berard X, Caillon J, et al. Editor’s choice: European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 clinical practice guidelines on the management of vascular graft and endograft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 59:339–384. PMID: 32035742.
Article
9. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:1. PMID: 25554246.
Article
10. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:i4919. PMID: 27733354.
Article
11. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336:924–926. PMID: 18436948.
Article
12. Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.4. Cochrane;2023. updated August 2023. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook .
13. Armstrong PA, Back MR, Wilson JS, Shames ML, Johnson BL, Bandyk DF. Improved outcomes in the recent management of secondary aortoenteric fistula. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42:660–666. PMID: 16242551.
Article
14. Arya S, Coleman DM, Knepper J, Henke PK, Upchurch GR, Rectenwald JE, et al. Outcomes after late explantation of aortic endografts depend on indication for explantation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013; 27:865–873. PMID: 23993104.
Article
15. Capoccia L, Speziale F, Menna D, Esposito A, Sirignano P, Rizzo AR, et al. Preliminary results from a national enquiry of infection in abdominal aortic endovascular repair (registry of infection in EVAR: R.I.EVAR). Ann Vasc Surg. 2016; 30:198–204. PMID: 26408970.
Article
16. Chaufour X, Gaudric J, Goueffic Y, Khodja RH, Feugier P, Malikov S, et al. A multicenter experience with infected abdominal aortic endograft explantation. J Vasc Surg. 2017; 65:372–380. PMID: 27720319.
Article
17. Chen CL, Kuo TT, Chen IM, Chen TW, Chen PL, Huang CY, et al. Mid-term outcome of infected abdominal aortic stent graft dismantlement with reconstruction of bilateral axillofemoral bypass. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021; 22:680–683. PMID: 33337972.
Article
18. Darling RC 3rd, Resnikoff M, Kreienberg PB, Chang BB, Paty PS, Leather RP, et al. Alternative approach for management of infected aortic grafts. J Vasc Surg. 1997; 25:106–112. PMID: 9013913.
Article
19. Davila VJ, Stone W, Duncan AA, Wood E, Jordan WD Jr, Zea N, et al. A multicenter experience with the surgical treatment of infected abdominal aortic endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62:877–883. PMID: 26184753.
Article
20. Dominguez-Cainzos J, Rodrigo-Manjon A, Rodriguez-Chinesta JM, Apodaka-Diez A, Bonmatí G, Bereciartua E. Abdominal aortic endograft infection. A decade of experience and literature review. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023; 41:155–161. PMID: 35906173.
Article
21. Dorigo W, Pulli R, Azas L, Pratesi G, Innocenti AA, Pratesi C. Early and long-term results of conventional surgical treatment of secondary aorto-enteric fistula. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 26:512–518. PMID: 14532879.
Article
22. Filiberto AC, Scali ST, Patterson S, Neal D, Elder CT, Shah SK, et al. Treatment and outcomes of aortic graft infections using a decision algorithm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021; 76:254–268. PMID: 34182116.
Article
23. Hayes PD, Nasim A, London NJ, Sayers RD, Barrie WW, Bell PR, et al. In situ replacement of infected aortic grafts with rifampicin-bonded prostheses: the Leicester experience (1992 to 1998). J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30:92–98. PMID: 10394158.
Article
24. Jicha DL, Reilly LM, Kuestner LM, Stoney RJ. Durability of cross-femoral grafts after aortic graft infection: the fate of autogenous conduits. J Vasc Surg. 1995; 22:393–407. PMID: 7563400.
Article
25. Maze MJ, Laws P, Buckenham T, Pithie A, Gallagher K, Metcalf S, et al. Outcomes of infected abdominal aortic grafts managed with antimicrobial therapy and graft retention in an unselected cohort. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013; 45:373–380. PMID: 23485067.
Article
26. Mirzaie M, Schmitto JD, Tirilomis T, Fatehpur S, Liakopoulos OJ, Teucher N, et al. Surgical management of vascular graft infection in severely ill patients by partial resection of the infected prosthesis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 33:610–613. PMID: 17276101.
Article
27. O’Hara PJ, Hertzer NR, Beven EG, Krajewski LP. Surgical management of infected abdominal aortic grafts: review of a 25-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 1986; 3:725–731. PMID: 3701939.
Article
28. Quiñones-Baldrich WJ, Hernandez JJ, Moore WS. Long-term results following surgical management of aortic graft infection. Arch Surg. 1991; 126:507–511. PMID: 2009068.
Article
29. Reilly LM, Stoney RJ, Goldstone J, Ehrenfeld WK. Improved management of aortic graft infection: the influence of operation sequence and staging. J Vasc Surg. 1987; 5:421–431. PMID: 3509595.
Article
30. Ricotta JJ, Faggioli GL, Stella A, Curl GR, Peer R, Upson J, et al. Total excision and extra-anatomic bypass for aortic graft infection. Am J Surg. 1991; 162:145–149. PMID: 1862835.
Article
31. Seeger JM, Pretus HA, Welborn MB, Ozaki CK, Flynn TC, Huber TS. Long-term outcome after treatment of aortic graft infection with staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 32:451–461. PMID: 10957651.
Article
32. Shukuzawa K, Ohki T, Maeda K, Kanaoka Y. Risk factors and treatment outcomes for stent graft infection after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019; 70:181–192. PMID: 30583901.
Article
33. Turney EJ, Steenberge SP, Lyden SP, Eagleton MJ, Srivastava SD, Sarac TP, et al. Late graft explants in endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 59:886–893. PMID: 24377945.
Article
34. Yeager RA, Moneta GL, Taylor LM Jr, Harris EJ Jr, McConnell DB, Porter JM. Improving survival and limb salvage in patients with aortic graft infection. Am J Surg. 1990; 159:466–469. PMID: 2334008.
Article
35. Lyons OT, Baguneid M, Barwick TD, Bell RE, Foster N, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, et al. Diagnosis of aortic graft infection: a case definition by the management of aortic graft infection collaboration (MAGIC). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016; 52:758–763. PMID: 27771318.
Article
36. O’Connor S, Andrew P, Batt M, Becquemin JP. A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatments for aortic graft infection. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44:38–45. PMID: 16828424.
Article
37. Post IC, Vos CG. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the management of open abdominal aortic graft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 58:258–281. PMID: 31178356.
38. Niaz OS, Rao A, Carey D, Refson JR, Abidia A, Somaiya P. Systematic review and meta: analysis of aortic graft infections following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Int J Vasc Med. 2020; 2020:9574734. PMID: 32206352.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr