Ultrasonography.  2023 Jul;42(3):421-431. 10.14366/usg.22212.

Transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter versus two-dimensional shear wave elastography with attenuation imaging for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
  • 2Department of Radiology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
  • 3Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
This study compared the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) to attenuation imaging (ATI) in the diagnosis of steatosis and transient elastography (TE) to two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) for the diagnosis of fibrosis in a prospectively constructed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patient cohort.
Methods
Participants who underwent TE with CAP were included from a previously constructed NAFLD cohort with multiparametric ultrasound data. The degree of hepatic steatosis and stage of liver fibrosis were assessed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the grades of steatosis (S1-3) and fibrosis (F0-F4).
Results
There were 105 participants. The distribution of hepatic steatosis grades (S0-S3) and liver fibrosis stages (F0-F4) was as follows: S0, n=34; S1, n=41; S2, n=22; S3, n=8; F0, n=63; F1, n=25; F2, n=5; F3, n=7; and F4, n=5. No significant difference was found between CAP and ATI in detecting ≥S1 (AUROC: 0.93 vs. 0.93, P=0.956) or ≥S2 (0.94 vs. 0.94, P=0.769). However, the AUROC of ATI in detecting ≥S3 was significantly higher than that of CAP (0.94 vs. 0.87, P=0.047). Regarding the detection of liver fibrosis, no significant difference was found between TE and 2D-SWE. The AUROCs of TE and 2D-SWE were as follows: ≥F1, 0.94 vs. 0.89 (P=0.107); ≥F2, 0.89 vs. 0.90 (P=0.644); ≥F3, 0.91 vs. 0.90 (P=0.703); and ≥F4, 0.88 vs. 0.92 (P=0.209).
Conclusion
2D-SWE and TE showed comparable diagnostic performance in assessing liver fibrosis, and ATI provided significantly better performance in detecting ≥S3 steatosis than CAP.

Keyword

Liver cirrhosis; Fatty liver; Elasticity imaging techniques
Full Text Links
  • USG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr