Nutr Res Pract.  2023 Jun;17(3):565-582. 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.3.565.

Factors affecting the willingness to pay extra for safe food

• Kyung M
• Kim D
• Ham S

• KMID: 2542851
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2023.17.3.565

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
With the outbreak of infectious diseases, such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), public interest in health and safety has increased, and consequently, interests in food safety have been heightened too. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the involvement of various categories of consumers in food safety, the subjective evaluation of food safety in Korea, and the willingness of the consumers to pay extra for safe food according to their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
MATERIALS/METHODS
This study used data from the 2020 Consumer Behavior Survey for Food provided by the Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI). The subjects were 6,355 adult household members aged 19 to 75 years old. The survey was conducted from June 10th to August 21st, 2020. The data for the study were subjected to statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, complex sample general linear model, k-means cluster, and multiple regression analyses.
RESULTS
The factors affecting the willingness to pay extra for safe food were education level, occupation, monthly household income, presence of a young (teenager) household member, and the subjects’ involvement in food safety. the significant factors affecting the willingness to pay extra for safe food were sex, age, and income level for the group exhibiting a low level of involvement in food safety, while education level and presence of a young household member were the statistically significant factors for the group exhibiting a high level of involvement in food safety.
CONCLUSION
This study verified the differences in the factors associated with the willingness to pay extra for safe food according to the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, involvement in food safety, subjective evaluation of food safety. This study offers practical implications to the industry and government that would help in directing strategies to strengthen safe food management.

Keyword

Food safety; safety perception; safety involvement; subjective evaluation; pay extra for safe food

Reference

1. Song YJ, Yoo HJ. The covariance structural analysis of perceived risk on food safety consciousness and food safety pursuit between seoul & shanghai consumers: focused on food consumption. J Consum Stud. 2008; 19:215–244.

2. Yoon YY, Kim KJ. A qualitative study on consumers' perceptions of food safety risk factors. J Korean Home Manag Assoc. 2013; 19:15–31.

3. Kim OH. The effects of health beliefs and prevention behavior intentions on eating out during the COVID-19 pandemic: applying a health belief model. Int J Tour Hosp Res. 2020; 34:169–185.

4. Galanakis CM. The food systems in the era of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic crisis. Foods. 2020; 9:523. PMID: 32331259.

5. Park JH, Jo SJ. The effect of health concern on heal care behavior: Focused on moderating effect of the cooking shows information acceptance. Culin Sci Hosp Res. 2021; 27:80–89.

6. Choi KS, Kim JE. The relationship of consumer anxiety of food hazard, and food consumer information literacy with dietary life satisfaction. J Rural Dev. 2020; 43:91–116.

7. Korea Rural Economic Institute. 2020 Food consumption behavior survey [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute;2021. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: http://www.krei.re.kr/ .

8. Kim HA, Jung HY. A study of consumer perceptions of food safety and food buying behavior. Culin Sci Hosp Res. 2018; 24:93–103.

9. Kim JS, Song TM, Lee NH, Sim BR. Strategy Formulation Plan for Public Health and Safety. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2015. p. 16–46.

10. World Health Organization. Who global strategy for food safety: safer food for better health. Geneva: World Health Organization;2002. p. 9–13.

11. Kim JS, Song TM, Lee NH, Sim BR. Strategy formulation plan for public health and safety. KIHASA R&D Report. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2015. p. 16–46.

12. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Radioactive Safety Information for Imported Food: Restrictions on Import of Food from Japan [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2020. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: https://radsafe.mfds.go.kr/ .

13. YTN Plus. Controversy over Chinese pickled cabbage... Ministry of Food and Drug Safety “Strengthen safety management” [Internet]. Seoul: YTN Plus;2021. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: https://www.ytn.co.kr/ .

14. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Investigation of Food Safety Accidents and Import Sanitation Standards in Major Countries. Sejong: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs;2017. p. 3–9.

15. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Regulations on scope, investigation and procedure of reporting foreign substance [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2019. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/ .

16. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Special Act on Imported Food Safety Control [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2021. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/ .

17. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Regulations on restaurant hygiene grade designation and operation management [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2021. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/ .

18. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Notification of restaurant hygiene grade designation (22. 2. 4. Notice) [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2022. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: https://www.mfds.go.kr/ .

19. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Hazard analysis and critical control point of food and livestock [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2021. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/ .

20. Lim MC, Woo MA, Choi SW. Current status of food safety detection methods for Smart-HACCP system. Food Sci Ind. 2021; 54:293–300.

21. Kim S, Huh KO. A study on food consumption life style of main food buyer, food safety consciousness, environmental consciousness and eco-friendly food consumption. J Consum Cult. 2019; 22:23–44.

22. Kim KD, Lee JY. A survey on the housewives’ purchasing behavior and needs for food safety information. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2010; 39:392–398.

23. Jung HY. Study of students’ perception of food safety and food purchasing behavior. Korean J Community Living Sci. 2018; 29:247–257.

24. Jun SM. The influence of consumer anxiety about food hazards on food label use and safe food purchase: focusing on the difference test by knowledge level of safety labeling. J Consum Cult. 2017; 20:87–108.

25. Jung KH, Jung JW, Yoon SM, Shin JH, Kim JS, No JW, Jang HG, Lee Y. A study on willingness to pay survey and development educational material for consumers about foreign matters in food. MFDS R&D Report. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2010. p. 149–151.

26. Lee YA. Determinants of consumers’ awareness, satisfaction and trust of food labeling. Consum Policy Educ Rev. 2019; 15:97–122.

27. Ryu MH. A study on safety pursuit behavior and safety information needs for processed food - focused on adolescent consumers. Consum Policy Educ Rev. 2014; 10:59–82.

28. Chung KH, Jeong JW, Yoon SM, Shin JH, Kim JS, Noh JW, Chang HG, Lee Y. A study on willingness to pay survey and development educational material for consumers about foreign matters in food. MFDS R&D Report. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2010. p. 229–232.

29. Yang SB, Yang SR. Analysis of benefit and cost on management of foreign matters in food. Korean J Food Mark Econ. 2013; 30:73–92.

30. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Food consumption behavior survey raw data user guide [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute;2021. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: http://www.krei.re.kr/ .

31. Korea Rural Economic Institute. The consumer behavior survey for food 2020 [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute;2020. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: http://www.krei.re.kr/ .

32. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Food consumption behavior survey: sample composition and weights [Internet]. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute;2022. cited 2022 February 9. Available from: http://www.krei.re.kr/ .

33. Choe JS, Chun HK, Hwang DY, Nam HJ. Consumer perceptions of food-related hazards and correlates of degree of concerns about food. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2005; 34:66–74.

34. Lee YH, Lee SS. Consumer trust and food safety pursuit behavior by purchase stage. J Consum Cult. 2011; 14:5–26.

35. Jin HJ, Lim JY, Lee KI. The sentiment index of consumers about food safety and analysis for influential factors. J Consum Policy Stud. 2014; 45:1–21.

36. Lin HB, Lee SS. A study of Korean consumers on dietary satisfaction to sentiment index about food safety: focusing on moderating effects of reliance to food safety information. J Korean Home Manage Assoc. 2016; 34:15–26.

37. Park MS, Lee BJ, Ham S. Comparison of consumer’s perceptions of quality certified agricultural products by consumer’s health-concern and environmental concern. J Foodserv Manag. 2014; 17:107–132.

38. Kim EJ, Hwang SS, Park JM, Lee HI. A study on health promotion behaviors of a group of middle aged men in K-Ku, Incheon City. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2004; 15:408–418.

39. Lee SY, Kim IH, Jang JH. A study on the relationship between health concern and purchase behavior of the environmental friendly agricultural products. Korean J Local Gov Adm Stud. 2011; 25:77–100.

40. Yoo HJ. The effects of concerns on food safety and trust in label information on label use and willingness to pay among Korean consumers. Crisisonomy. 2016; 12:167–177.