Korean J Schizophr Res.  2023 Apr;26(1):12-17. 10.16946/kjsr.2023.26.1.12.

Risk for Self-Harm or Harm to Others: Definition and Assessment of Dangerousness

• Lee K

• KMID: 2542195
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.16946/kjsr.2023.26.1.12

Abstract

The Mental Health Act of 1995 was fully revised on May 29, 2016, and implemented on May 30, 2017, under the name of the Mental Health Promotion and Mental Health Service Support Act (Mental Health Welfare Act). The act newly defined mentally ill people as those with significant limitations in independent daily life and reduced their classification based on severity. Before the revision, patients could be admitted to the hospital if satisfied with the risk of self-injury or harm to others or the need for treatment. The self-injury and harm to others risk criteria for involuntary admission is based on the idea of respecting patients’ right to self-determination. However, predicting future risks can be challenging, and the situation at the time of judgment should be considered. This study aims to examine the administrative and legal interpretation of the self-injury or harm to others risk for involuntary admission, review definitions and evaluations of the risk of self-harm in various areas, and suggest improvements for mental health policies or guidelines.

Keyword

Dangerousness; Involuntary admission; Mental Health and Welfare Act; Self-harm; 비자의 입원; 위험성; 자해; 정신건강복지법

Reference

1. Act on the Improvement of Mental Health and the Support for Welfare Services for Mental Patients. 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 5]; Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%A0%95%EC%8B%A0%EA%B1%B4%EA%B0%95%EC%A6%9D%EC%A7%84%EB%B0%8F%EC%A0%95%EC%8B%A0%EC%A7%88%ED%99%98%EC%9E%90%EB%B3%B5%EC%A7%80%EC%84%9C%EB%B9%84%EC%8A%A4%EC%A7%80%EC%9B%90%EC%97%90%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0.

2. Mental Health Act. 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 5]; Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%A0%95%EC%8B%A0%EB%B3%B4%EA%B1%B4%EB%B2%95/ (13323,20150518).

3. Fields JD. O’Connor v. Donaldson. Hofstra Law Review. 1976; 4:10.

4. Burnstein SM. Constitutional Law—Due Process—Civil Commitment—Absent Treatment, a Nondangerous Mentally Ill Person Able to Survive Safely in Society Has a Constitutional Right to Release—O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 US 563 (1975). Washington Law Review. 1976; 51:764.

5. Abuse S. Civil Commitment and the Mental Health Care Continuum: historical trends and principles for law and practice;2019.

6. Ratliff J. Parens patriae: An overview. Tul L Rev. 1999; 74:1847.

7. Testa M, West SG. Civil commitment in the United States. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2010; 7:30.

8. Ferris CE. The search for due process in civil commitment hearings: How procedural realities have altered substantive standards. Vand L Rev. 2008; 61:959.

9. Chen H. The mediation approach: Representing clients with mental illness in civil commitment proceedings. Geo J Legal Ethics. 2006; 19:599.

10. Large MM, Ryan CJ, Nielssen OB, Hayes R. The danger of dangerousness: why we must remove the dangerousness criterion from our mental health acts. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008; 34:877–881.

11. Nielssen OB, Large MM. Mental health laws influence the duration of untreated psychosis. Psychiatric Services. 2015; 66:1254–1254.

12. Walker LE, Shapiro D, Akl S, Walker LE, Shapiro D, Akl S. Risk Assessment and Involuntary Commitment. Introduction to Forensic Psychology: Clinical and Social Psychological Perspectives;2020. p. 155–172.

13. Welfare MoHa. Guide to admission and discharge procedures under the Mental Health and Welfare Act. . Seoul;2020.

14. Implementation Rules of the Mental Health Promotion and Mental Illness Welfare Service Act. 2020 [cited 2023 Mar 5]; Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EC%A0%95%EC%8B%A0%EA%B1%B4%EA%B0%95%EC%A6%9D%EC%A7%84%20%EB%B0%8F%20%EC%A0%95%EC%8B%A0%EC%A7%88%ED%99%98%EC%9E%90%20%EB%B3%B5%EC%A7%80%EC%84%9C%EB%B9%84%EC%8A% A4%20%EC%A7%80%EC%9B%90%EC%97%90%20%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C%20%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0%20%EC%8B%9C%ED%96%89%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99.

15. The Police Duties and Powers Act. 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 5]; Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EA%B2%BD%EC%B0%B0%EA%B4%80%EC%A7%81%EB%AC%B4%EC%A7%91%ED%96%89%EB%B2%95.

16. Welfare MoHa. Responding to Mental Health Emergencies on Scene 2.0. Health NCfM. Seoul;2018.

17. Bengelsdorf H, Levy LE, Emerson RL, Barile FA. A crisis triage rating scale brief dispositional assessment of patients at risk for hospitalization. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 1984; 172:424–430.

18. Han S, Jung H, Seo Y, Kim J, Son N, Lee M. Crisis Triage Rating Scale for Crisis of Suicide and Mental Illness: Based on the Experiences of Seoul Suicide Prevention Center. Mental Health Services. 2009; 7:23–28.

19. Korea NCfMHo. A guide to risk assessment in psychiatric emergencies. Welfare MoHa. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2020.

20. Welfare MoHa. Guide to Suicide Prevention in 2022. Welfare MoHa. Sejong-si;2022.

21. Senate TNYS. The Laws of New York. New York;2022.

22. State NY. Mental Hygiene Law - Admissions Process. [cited 2023 Mar 5]; Available from: https://omh.ny.gov/omhweb/forensic/manual/html/mhl_admissions.htm.

23. King R, Robinson J. Obligatory dangerousness criteria in the involuntary commitment and treatment provisions of Australian mental health legislation. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2011; 34:64–70.

24. Government Q. Queensland Government. Mental Health Act 2016. [cited; Available from: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/clinical-practice/guidelines-procedures/clinical-staff/mental-health/act.

25. Saya A, Brugnoli C, Piazzi G, Liberato D, Di Ciaccia G, Niolu C, et al. Criteria, procedures, and future prospects of involuntary treatment in psychiatry around the world: a narrative review. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2019; 10:271.

26. Yerushalmy J. Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. Public Health Reports (1896-1970). 1947; 1432–1449.

27. Pfeffer A. Imminent Danger and Inconsistency: The Need for National Reform of the Imminent Danger Standard for Involuntary Civil Commitment in the Wake of the Virginia Tech Tragedy. Cardozo L Rev. 2008; 30:277.

28. Stambaugh H, Sood AB. An Unchecked Descent into Madness: The Life of Seung-Hui Cho. The Virginia Tech Massacre: Strategies and Challenges for Improving Mental Health Policy on Campus and Beyond;2014. p. 13.