J Rhinol.  2023 Mar;30(1):23-30. 10.18787/jr.2023.00001.

Risk Factors for Rebleeding After Successful Rapid Rhino Packing in Epistaxis Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Daejin Medical Center, Seongnam, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Epistaxis is one of the most common emergencies in otolaryngology, and the recently developed Rapid Rhino nasal pack, a balloon-type nasal packing device, is widely used in emergency departments. Rebleeding after initial treatment increases patients’ discomfort and medical costs. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for rebleeding in patients treated with Rapid Rhino packing.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 93 patients with epistaxis treated with Rapid Rhino from January 2020 to November 2022 were divided into the well-controlled group (39 patients) and the rebleeding group (54 patients), and the baseline characteristics, management methods, and complications were compared between these groups. The rebleeding group was divided according to whether patients experienced a single episode of rebleeding (38 patients) or multiple rebleeding episodes (16 patients), and the differences between these two groups were compared.
Results
Oral anticoagulation therapy was associated with a higher risk of rebleeding after Rapid Rhino packing (odds ratio [OR]=8.41, p=0.047). A history of nasal surgery was associated with multiple rebleeding (OR=22.55, p=0.009). Age, sex, the management method, complications, and the site of bleeding were not found to be related to rebleeding.
Conclusion
Patients with rebleeding after Rapid Rhino nasal packing had a higher rate of concurrent oral anticoagulation therapy. A history of nasal surgery was strongly associated with multiple episodes of rebleeding. A detailed medical history can be important for assessing the risk of rebleeding in epistaxis patients treated with Rapid Rhino packing.

Keyword

Epistaxis; Anticoagulants; Risk factors

Figure

  • Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of the management flow of epistaxis patients and participant selection process in this study.

  • Fig. 2. Utilization of a Rapid Rhino nasal pack. A: Soak the device in sterile water for 30 seconds. B: Insert along the nasal floor. C: Inflate the balloon with air. D: Tape to the patient’s cheek. Remove after 24–72 hours.


Reference

References

1. Buiret G, Pavic M, Pignat JC, Pasquet F. Gelatin-thrombin matrix: a new and simple way to manage recurrent epistaxis in hematology units. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2013; 2013:851270.
Article
2. Reyre A, Michel J, Santini L, Dessi P, Vidal V, Bartoli JM, et al. Epistaxis: the role of arterial embolization. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015; 96(7-8):757–73.
Article
3. Tunkel DE, Anne S, Payne SC, Ishman SL, Rosenfeld RM, Abramson PJ, et al. Clinical practice guideline: nosebleed (epistaxis). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 162(1_suppl):S1–38.
Article
4. Yang X, Yi K, Tian J, Guo Y. [A meta-analysis compare rapid rhino with Merocel for nasal packing]. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012; 26(14):655–60. Chinese.
5. Moumoulidis I, Draper MR, Patel H, Jani P, Price T. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing Merocel and Rapid Rhino nasal tampons in the treatment of epistaxis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 263(8):719–22.
Article
6. Badran K, Malik TH, Belloso A, Timms MS. Randomized controlled trial comparing Merocel® and RapidRhino® packing in the management of anterior epistaxis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005; 30(4):333–7.
7. Nikolaou G, Holzmann D, Soyka MB. Discomfort and costs in epistaxis treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 270(8):2239–44.
Article
8. Gudziol V, Mewes T, Mann WJ. Rapid Rhino: a new pneumatic nasal tamponade for posterior epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132(1):152–5.
Article
9. Pallin DJ, Chng YM, McKay MP, Emond JA, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA Jr. Epidemiology of epistaxis in US emergency departments, 1992 to 2001. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 46(1):77–81.
Article
10. Denholm SW, Maynard CA, Watson HG. Warfarin and epistaxis--a case controlled study. J Laryngol Otol. 1993; 107(3):195–6.
11. Abrich V, Brozek A, Boyle TR, Chyou PH, Yale SH. Risk factors for recurrent spontaneous epistaxis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014; 89(12):1636–43.
Article
12. Liao Z, Guo J, Mi J, Liao W, Chen S, Huang Y, et al. Analysis of bleeding site to identify associated risk factors of intractable epistaxis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021; 17:817–22.
Article
13. Krulewitz NA, Fix ML. Epistaxis. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2019; 37(1):29–39.
Article
14. Byun H, Chung JH, Lee SH, Ryu J, Kim C, Shin JH. Association of hypertension with the risk and severity of epistaxis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 147(1):1–7.
Article
15. Min HJ, Kang H, Choi GJ, Kim KS. Association between hypertension and epistaxis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 157(6):921–7.
Article
16. Ando Y, Iimura J, Arai S, Arai C, Komori M, Tsuyumu M, et al. Risk factors for recurrent epistaxis: importance of initial treatment. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014; 41(1):41–5.
Article
17. Kallenbach M, Dittberner A, Boeger D, Buentzel J, Kaftan H, Hoffmann K, et al. Hospitalization for epistaxis: a population-based healthcare research study in Thuringia, Germany. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; 277(6):1659–66.
Article
18. Wang L, Wang X, Ba Y. Clinical analysis of delayed epistaxis following endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2022; 43(3):103406.
Article
19. Seidel DU, Jacob L, Kostev K, Sesterhenn AM. Risk factors for epistaxis in patients followed in general practices in Germany. Rhinology. 2017; 55(4):312–8.
Article
20. Schmelzer B, Katz S, Vidts G. Long-term efficacy of our surgical approach to turbinate hypertrophy. Am J Rhinol. 1999; 13(5):357–61.
Article
21. Koskinen A, Myller J, Mattila P, Penttilä M, Silvola J, Alastalo I, et al. Long-term follow-up after ESS and balloon sinuplasty: comparison of symptom reduction and patient satisfaction. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016; 136(5):532–6.
Article
22. Kim SJ, Lee SJ, Go YJ, Park S, Bae JH. Characteristics and risk factors of recurrent epistaxis in geriatric patients. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2021; 64(8):548–53.
Article
23. Mackeith S, Hettige R, Falzon A, Draper M. The relationship between pressure and volume when using Rapid Rhino(r) packs in the management of epistaxis. Rhinology. 2011; 49(4):470–3.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr