Cardiovasc Prev Pharmacother.  2023 Jan;5(1):1-14. 10.36011/cpp.2023.5.e1.

Adverse reactions to antiarrhythmic drugs

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea

Abstract

There are various types of adverse reactions to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Proarrhythmia, which refers to an exacerbation of the preexisting arrhythmia or occurrence of a new arrhythmia, may occur under the therapeutic concentration of an AAD. Bradyarrhythmia is the most common type of proarrhythmia due to AADs, and prior myocardial infarction and old age are known risk factors. Atrial flutter with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction usually occurs during rhythm control of atrial fibrillation with class IC AADs. QT prolongation due to AADs, mainly class III AADs, elevates the risk of torsade de pointes by triggered activity due to early afterdepolarization. The addition of clinical factors that promote QT prolongation, such as hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, female sex, and bradycardia, increases the risk of developing torsade de pointes. Proarrhythmic monomorphic ventricular tachycardia usually occurs as a result of slow conduction and disparity of refractoriness due to class IC AADs. In patients with preexisting left ventricular systolic dysfunction or structural heart disease, the risk of hypotension or cardiogenic shock caused by negative inotropic effects due to AADs should be considered. To prevent these major adverse reactions to AADs, we need to understand the electrophysiologic properties of AADs in detail. Furthermore, the risk of proarrhythmia could be heightened by interplay with clinical factors, such as electrolyte unbalances, heart rate, and hepatic/renal or myocardial dysfunction. Sufficient awareness about drug-drug interactions, which may affect the metabolism of AADs, will improve patient safety during the management of arrhythmia.

Keyword

Anti-arrhythmia agents; Proarrhythmia; Drug interactions

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Atrial flutter with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction. (A) This 51-year-old male patient was transferred due to wide QRS complex tachycardia. He had been treated with flecainide and verapamil due to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. (B) The tachycardia was not terminated by adenosine, and the rhythm postadenosine infusion was compatible with typical atrial flutter. Subsequently during catheter ablation for his atrial fibrillation, atypical atrial flutter was induced by burst pacing under intravenous flecainide infusion. (C) The QRS complex morphology of the induced atrial flutter was the same as that of the initial electrocardiography of wide QRS tachycardia. This could be accepted as a finding providing further support that (A) the QRS widening of electrocardiography occurred by aberrant conduction, affected by flecainide.

  • Fig. 2. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. This 44-year-old female patient underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation and implantation of a permanent pacemaker (DDDR mode) due to typical atrial flutter and sick sinus syndrome. She had taken flecainide (50 mg twice daily), and diltiazem (30 mg twice daily) due to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. She visited the emergency room due to palpitation. Her blood pressure was 90/60 mmHg. (A) Initial electrocardiography showed wide QRS tachycardia of 180 beats/min. The tachycardia was not responsive to intravenous adenosine, and electrical cardioversion was performed for sinus conversion. (B) Interrogation of the pacemaker showed that the clinical tachycardia was compatible with ventricular tachycardia. The morphology of the QRS complex during tachycardia resembles a sine wave.

  • Fig. 3. Amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity. (A) Chest radiography and (B) a high-resolution computed tomography of a 58-year-old male patient with amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity. This patient with persistent atrial fibrillation had been treated with oral amiodarone. (A) Chest radiography was performed due to mild dyspnea during exertion, and increased opacity in the right middle and lower lung fields was observed. (B) Diffuse peribronchial consolidations with ground-glass opacity and nodular density at both lung fields were detected on computed tomography.


Reference

1. Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, Brandes A, Eckardt L, Elvan A, et al. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:1305–16.
2. Tsadok MA, Jackevicius CA, Essebag V, Eisenberg MJ, Rahme E, Humphries KH, et al. Rhythm versus rate control therapy and subsequent stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012; 126:2680–7.
3. Coleman JJ, Pontefract SK. Adverse drug reactions. Clin Med (Lond). 2016; 16:481–5.
4. Vaughan Williams EM. A classification of antiarrhythmic actions reassessed after a decade of new drugs. J Clin Pharmacol. 1984; 24:129–47.
5. Lei M, Wu L, Terrar DA, Huang CL. Modernized classification of cardiac antiarrhythmic drugs. Circulation. 2018; 138:1879–96.
6. Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. The Sicilian gambit: a new approach to the classification of antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Circulation. 1991; 84:1831–51.
7. Dan GA, Martinez-Rubio A, Agewall S, Boriani G, Borggrefe M, Gaita F, et al. Antiarrhythmic drugs-clinical use and clinical decision making: a consensus document from the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacology, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) and International Society of Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (ISCP). Europace. 2018; 20:731–732an.
8. Friedman PL, Stevenson WG. Proarrhythmia. Am J Cardiol. 1998; 82(8A):50N–58N.
9. Maisel WH, Kuntz KM, Reimold SC, Lee TH, Antman EM, Friedman PL, et al. Risk of initiating antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation in patients admitted to a university hospital. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127:281–4.
10. Hondeghem LM, Katzung BG. Antiarrhythmic agents: the modulated receptor mechanism of action of sodium and calcium channel-blocking drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1984; 24:387–423.
11. Ikeda N, Singh BN, Davis LD, Hauswirth O. Effects of flecainide on the electrophysiologic properties of isolated canine and rabbit myocardial fibers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 5(2 Pt 1):303–10.
12. Kim M, Kwon CH, Lee JH, Hwang KW, Choi HO, Kim YG, et al. Right bundle branch block-type wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6: development and validation of electrocardiographic differentiation criteria. Heart Rhythm. 2021; 18:181–8.
13. Morganroth J. Risk factors for the development of proarrhythmic events. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 59:32E–37E.
14. Stanton MS, Prystowsky EN, Fineberg NS, Miles WM, Zipes DP, Heger JJ. Arrhythmogenic effects of antiarrhythmic drugs: a study of 506 patients treated for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 14:209–17.
15. Falk RH. Flecainide-induced ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in patients treated for atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 111:107–11.
16. Josephson ME. Antiarrhythmic agents and the danger of proarrhythmic events. Ann Intern Med. 1989; 111:101–3.
17. Passman R, Kadish A. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, long Q-T syndrome, and torsades de pointes. Med Clin North Am. 2001; 85:321–41.
18. Roden DM. Risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapy. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331:785–91.
19. Kay GN, Plumb VJ, Arciniegas JG, Henthorn RW, Waldo AL. Torsade de pointes: the long-short initiating sequence and other clinical features: observations in 32 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983; 2:806–17.
20. Jackman WM, Friday KJ, Anderson JL, Aliot EM, Clark M, Lazzara R. The long QT syndromes: a critical review, new clinical observations and a unifying hypothesis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1988; 31:115–72.
21. Makkar RR, Fromm BS, Steinman RT, Meissner MD, Lehmann MH. Female gender as a risk factor for torsades de pointes associated with cardiovascular drugs. JAMA. 1993; 270:2590–7.
22. Meierhenrich R, Helguera ME, Kidwell GA, Tebbe U. Influence of amiodarone on QT dispersion in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and clinical outcome. Int J Cardiol. 1997; 60:289–94.
23. Grimm W, Steder U, Menz V, Hoffmann J, Maisch B. Effect of amiodarone on QT dispersion in the 12-lead standard electrocardiogram and its significance for subsequent arrhythmic events. Clin Cardiol. 1997; 20:107–10.
24. Hondeghem LM, Snyders DJ. Class III antiarrhythmic agents have a lot of potential but a long way to go: reduced effectiveness and dangers of reverse use dependence. Circulation. 1990; 81:686–90.
25. Selzer A, Wray HW. Quinidine syncope: paroxysmal ventricular fibrillation occurring during treatment of chronic atrial arrhythmias. Circulation. 1964; 30:17–26.
26. Touboul P, Brugada J, Capucci A, Crijns HJ, Edvardsson N, Hohnloser SH. Dronedarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation: a dose-ranging study. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24:1481–7.
27. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, Gaudin C, Page RL, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360:668–78.
28. Le Heuzey JY, De Ferrari GM, Radzik D, Santini M, Zhu J, Davy JM. A short-term, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the DIONYSOS study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21:597–605.
29. Ruskin JN, McGovern B, Garan H, DiMarco JP, Kelly E. Antiarrhythmic drugs: a possible cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1983; 309:1302–6.
30. Minardo JD, Heger JJ, Miles WM, Zipes DP, Prystowsky EN. Clinical characteristics of patients with ventricular fibrillation during antiarrhythmic drug therapy. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319:257–62.
31. Tisdale JE, Chung MK, Campbell KB, Hammadah M, Joglar JA, Leclerc J, et al. Drug-induced arrhythmias: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020; 142:e214–33.
32. Barekatain A, Razavi M. Antiarrhythmic therapy in atrial fibrillation: indications, guidelines, and safety. Tex Heart Inst J. 2012; 39:532–4.
33. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell LB, Peters RW, Obias-Manno D, Barker AH, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324:781–8.
34. Pfisterer M. Negative inotropic effects of antiarrhythmic drugs: a clinical point of view. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991; 17 Suppl 6:S44–7.
35. El Hadidi S, Rosano G, Tamargo J, Agewall S, Drexel H, Kaski JC, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: ESC position statement on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction-specific inappropriate prescribing. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022; 8:187–210.
36. MacNeil DJ, Davies RO, Deitchman D. Clinical safety profile of sotalol in the treatment of arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72:44A–50A.
37. Hamer AW, Arkles LB, Johns JA. Beneficial effects of low dose amiodarone in patients with congestive cardiac failure: a placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989; 14:1768–74.
38. Pfisterer M, Burkart F, Muller-Brand J, Kiowski W. Important differences between short- and long-term hemodynamic effects of amiodarone in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease at rest and during ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 5:1205–11.
39. Doshi D, Jayawardana R. Amiodarone-induced life-threatening refractory hypotension. Am J Case Rep. 2015; 16:617–20.
40. Maghrabi K, Uzun O, Kirsh JA, Balaji S, Von Bergen NH, Sanatani S. Cardiovascular collapse with intravenous amiodarone in children: a multi-center retrospective cohort study. Pediatr Cardiol. 2019; 40:925–33.
41. Naccarelli GV, Jalal S. Intravenous amiodarone: another option in the acute management of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Circulation. 1995; 92:3154–5.
42. Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, McMurray JJ, Gotzsche O, Levy S, Crijns H, et al. Increased mortality after dronedarone therapy for severe heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:2678–87.
43. Connolly SJ, Camm AJ, Halperin JL, Joyner C, Alings M, Amerena J, et al. Dronedarone in high-risk permanent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365:2268–76.
44. Gautier P, Guillemare E, Marion A, Bertrand JP, Tourneur Y, Nisato D. Electrophysiologic characterization of dronedarone in guinea pig ventricular cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003; 41:191–202.
45. Lim KS, Cho JY, Jang IJ, Kim BH, Kim J, Jeon JY, et al. Pharmacokinetic interaction of flecainide and paroxetine in relation to the CYP2D6*10 allele in healthy Korean subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 66:660–6.
46. Lewis GP, Holtzman JL. Interaction of flecainide with digoxin and propranolol. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 53:52B–57B.
47. Shea P, Lal R, Kim SS, Schechtman K, Ruffy R. Flecainide and amiodarone interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 7:1127–30.
48. Samlowski WE, Frame RN, Logue GL. Flecanide-induced immune neutropenia: documentation of a hapten-mediated mechanism of cell destruction. Arch Intern Med. 1987; 147:383–4.
49. Kuhlkamp V, Haasis R, Seipel L. Flecainide-induced hepatitis. Z Kardiol. 1988; 77:678–80.
50. Caron J, Libersa C. Adverse effects of class I antiarrhythmic drugs. Drug Saf. 1997; 17:8–36.
51. Kates RE, Yee YG, Kirsten EB. Interaction between warfarin and propafenone in healthy volunteer subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987; 42:305–11.
52. Calvo MV, Martin-Suarez A, Martin Luengo C, Avila C, Cascon M, Dominguez-Gil Hurle A. Interaction between digoxin and propafenone. Ther Drug Monit. 1989; 11:10–5.
53. Gaita F, Richiardi E, Bocchiardo M, Asteggiano R, Pinnavaia A, Di Leo M, et al. Short- and long-term effects of propafenone in ventricular arrhythmias. Int J Cardiol. 1986; 13:163–70.
54. Guindo J, Rodriguez de la Serna A, Borja J, Oter R, Jane F, Bayes de Luna A. Propafenone and a syndrome of the lupus erythematosus type. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 104:589.
55. Mondardini A, Pasquino P, Bernardi P, Aluffi E, Tartaglino B, Mazzucco G, et al. Propafenone-induced liver injury: report of a case and review of the literature. Gastroenterology. 1993; 104:1524–6.
56. Pollak PT, Bouillon T, Shafer SL. Population pharmacokinetics of long-term oral amiodarone therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 67:642–52.
57. McDonald MG, Au NT, Rettie AE. P450-based drug-drug interactions of amiodarone and its metabolites: diversity of inhibitory mechanisms. Drug Metab Dispos. 2015; 43:1661–9.
58. Takahashi H, Echizen H. Pharmacogenetics of warfarin elimination and its clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001; 40:587–603.
59. Sanoski CA, Bauman JL. Clinical observations with the amiodarone/warfarin interaction: dosing relationships with long-term therapy. Chest. 2002; 121:19–23.
60. Chitwood KK, Abdul-Haqq AJ, Heim-Duthoy KL. Cyclosporine-amiodarone interaction. Ann Pharmacother. 1993; 27:569–71.
61. Amiodarone Trials Meta-Analysis Investigators. Effect of prophylactic amiodarone on mortality after acute myocardial infarction and in congestive heart failure: meta-analysis of individual data from 6500 patients in randomised trials. Lancet. 1997; 350:1417–24.
62. Papiris SA, Triantafillidou C, Kolilekas L, Markoulaki D, Manali ED. Amiodarone: review of pulmonary effects and toxicity. Drug Saf. 2010; 33:539–58.
63. Lewis JH, Ranard RC, Caruso A, Jackson LK, Mullick F, Ishak KG, et al. Amiodarone hepatotoxicity: prevalence and clinicopathologic correlations among 104 patients. Hepatology. 1989; 9:679–85.
64. Boriani G, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Hohnloser SH, Bergfeldt L, Botto GL, Capucci A, et al. Safety and efficacy of dronedarone from clinical trials to real-world evidence: implications for its use in atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2019; 21:1764–75.
65. Goldschlager N, Epstein AE, Naccarelli GV, Olshansky B, Singh B, Collard HR, et al. A practical guide for clinicians who treat patients with amiodarone: 2007. Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4:1250–9.
66. Mar PL, Horbal P, Chung MK, Dukes JW, Ezekowitz M, Lakkireddy D, et al. Drug interactions affecting antiarrhythmic drug use. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022; 15:e007955.
67. Naccarelli GV, Wolbrette DL, Levin V, Samii S, Banchs JE, Penny-Peterson E, et al. Safety and efficacy of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation/flutter. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2011; 5:103–19.
68. Vallakati A, Chandra PA, Pednekar M, Frankel R, Shani J. Dronedarone-induced digoxin toxicity: new drug, new interactions. Am J Ther. 2013; 20:e717–9.
69. Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate mesylate). Boehringer Ingelheim; 2018.
70. Savaysa (edoxaban) prescribing information. Daiichi Sankyo;2015. [cited 2019 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/206316lbl.pdf.
71. Xarelto (rivaroxban). Janssen Pharmaceutical; 2011.
72. Wiggins BS, Dixon DL, Neyens RR, Page RL 2nd, Gluckman TJ. Select drug-drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75:1341–50.
73. Hoffmeister HM, Beyer M, Seipel L. Hemodynamic effects of the D- and L-isomers of sotalol on normal myocardium. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1991; 5:1027–33.
74. Antonaccio MJ, Gomoll A. Pharmacologic basis of the antiarrhythmic and hemodynamic effects of sotalol. Am J Cardiol. 1993; 72:27A–37A.
75. Orlando R, Piccoli P, De Martin S, Padrini R, Floreani M, Palatini P. Cytochrome P450 1A2 is a major determinant of lidocaine metabolism in vivo: effects of liver function. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 75:80–8.
76. Feely J, Wade D, McAllister CB, Wilkinson GR, Robertson D. Effect of hypotension on liver blood flow and lidocaine disposition. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:866–9.
77. Rademaker AW, Kellen J, Tam YK, Wyse DG. Character of adverse effects of prophylactic lidocaine in the coronary care unit. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986; 40:71–80.
78. Caporaso NE, Shaw GL. Clinical implications of the competitive inhibition of the debrisoquin-metabolizing isozyme by quinidine. Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151:1985–92.
79. Kaukonen KM, Olkkola KT, Neuvonen PJ. Itraconazole increases plasma concentrations of quinidine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997; 62:510–7.
80. Zhou HH, Anthony LB, Roden DM, Wood AJ. Quinidine reduces clearance of (+)-propranolol more than (–)-propranolol through marked reduction in 4-hydroxylation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990; 47:686–93.
81. Vitali Serdoz L, Rittger H, Furlanello F, Bastian D. Quinidine: a legacy within the modern era of antiarrhythmic therapy. Pharmacol Res. 2019; 144:257–63.
Full Text Links
  • CPP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr