Intest Res.  2023 Jan;21(1):20-42. 10.5217/ir.2022.00096.

Korean Guidelines for Postpolypectomy Colonoscopic Surveillance: 2022 revised edition

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
  • 5Department of Gastroenterology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
  • 7Department of Gastroenterology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
  • 8Digestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 9Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 10Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
  • 11Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 12Department of Gastroenterology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 13Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
  • 14National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
  • 15Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 16Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
  • 17Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 18Department of Gastroenterology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
  • 19Department of Gastroenterology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea
  • 20Digestive Disease Center, Institute for Digestive Research, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
  • 21Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Colonoscopic polypectomy is effective in decreasing the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC). Premalignant polyps discovered during colonoscopy are associated with the risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia. Postpolypectomy surveillance is the most important method for managing advanced metachronous neoplasia. A more efficient and evidence-based guideline for postpolypectomy surveillance is required because of the limited medical resources and concerns regarding colonoscopy complications. In these consensus guidelines, an analytic approach was used to address all reliable evidence to interpret the predictors of CRC or advanced neoplasia during surveillance colonoscopy. The key recommendations state that the high-risk findings for metachronous CRC following polypectomy are as follows: adenoma ≥10 mm in size; 3 to 5 (or more) adenomas; tubulovillous or villous adenoma; adenoma containing high-grade dysplasia; traditional serrated adenoma; sessile serrated lesion containing any grade of dysplasia; serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size; and 3 to 5 (or more) sessile serrated lesions. More studies are needed to fully comprehend the patients who are most likely to benefit from surveillance colonoscopy and the ideal surveillance interval to prevent metachronous CRC.

Keyword

Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Guidelines; Polypectomy; Surveillance

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Recommendations for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance.


Reference

1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70:145–164.
Article
2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy: the National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:1977–1981.
Article
3. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:687–696.
Article
4. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M, et al. Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129:34–41.
Article
5. Cottet V, Jooste V, Fournel I, Bouvier AM, Faivre J, Bonithon-Kopp C. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after adenoma removal: a population-based cohort study. Gut. 2012; 61:1180–1186.
Article
6. Cha JM, Kwak MS, Kim HS, et al. Real-world national colonoscopy volume in Korea: a nationwide population-based study over 12 years. Gut Liver. 2020; 14:338–346.
Article
7. Rapuri S, Spencer J, Eckels D. Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening: review of literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23:453–459.
Article
8. Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25:190–204.
Article
9. Hong SN, Yang DH, Kim YH, et al. Korean guidelines for post-polypectomy colonoscopic surveillance. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012; 59:99–117.
Article
10. Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC, et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158:1131–1153.
Article
11. Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: update 2020. Endoscopy. 2020; 52:687–700.
Article
12. Rutter MD, East J, Rees CJ, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines. Gut. 2020; 69:201–223.
Article
13. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010; 182:E839–E842.
Article
14. Lowe G, Twaddle S. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN): an update. Scott Med J. 2005; 50:51–52.
Article
15. Schünemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I, et al. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ. 2014; 186:E123–E142.
Article
16. Mustafa RA, Santesso N, Brozek J, et al. The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66:736–742.
Article
17. Zhang Y, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ. Using systematic reviews in guideline development: the GRADE approach. Res Synth Methods. 2019; 10:312–329.
Article
18. Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2017; 49:378–397.
Article
19. Min JK, Cha JM, Cho YK, et al. Revision of quality indicators for the Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea. Clin Endosc. 2018; 51:239–252.
Article
20. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81:31–53.
Article
21. Atkin W, Wooldrage K, Brenner A, et al. Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18:823–834.
Article
22. Wieszczy P, Kaminski MF, Franczyk R, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after removal of adenomas during screening colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158:875–883.
Article
23. Cross AJ, Robbins EC, Pack K, et al. Long-term colorectal cancer incidence after adenoma removal and the effects of surveillance on incidence: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. Gut. 2020; 69:1645–1658.
Article
24. He X, Hang D, Wu K, et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after removal of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158:852–861.
Article
25. Tollivoro TA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Index colonoscopy-related risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 89:168–176.
Article
26. Anderson JC, Rex DK, Robinson C, Butterly LF. Association of small versus diminutive adenomas and the risk for metachronous advanced adenomas: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 90:495–501.
Article
27. Hartstein JD, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. The predictive value of small versus diminutive adenomas for subsequent advanced neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 91:614–621.
Article
28. Click B, Pinsky PF, Hickey T, Doroudi M, Schoen RE. Association of colonoscopy adenoma findings with long-term colorectal cancer incidence. JAMA. 2018; 319:2021–2031.
Article
29. Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Risk of advanced lesions at first follow-up colonoscopy in high-risk groups as defined by the United Kingdom post-polypectomy surveillance guideline: data from a single U.S. center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 80:299–306.
Article
30. Cubiella J, Carballo F, Portillo I, et al. Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Endoscopy. 2016; 48:995–1002.
Article
31. Laish I, Seregeev I, Naftali T, Konikoff FM. Surveillance after positive colonoscopy based on adenoma characteristics. Dig Liver Dis. 2017; 49:1115–1120.
Article
32. Kim JY, Kim TJ, Baek SY, et al. Risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia in patients with multiple diminutive adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113:1855–1861.
Article
33. Moon CM, Jung SA, Eun CS, et al. The effect of small or diminutive adenomas at baseline colonoscopy on the risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia: KASID multicenter study. Dig Liver Dis. 2018; 50:847–852.
Article
34. Park SK, Yang HJ, Jung YS, Park JH, Sohn CI, Park DI. Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasm by the proposed combined United States and United Kingdom risk stratification guidelines. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018; 87:800–808.
Article
35. Kim NH, Jung YS, Lee MY, Park JH, Park DI, Sohn CI. Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after polypectomy in patients with multiple diminutive or small adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019; 114:1657–1664.
Article
36. Lieberman D, Sullivan BA, Hauser ER, et al. Baseline colonoscopy findings associated with 10-year outcomes in a screening cohort undergoing colonoscopy surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158:862–874.
Article
37. Pinsky PF, Schoen RE. Contribution of surveillance colonoscopy to colorectal cancer prevention. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18:2937–2944.
Article
38. Shono T, Oyama S, Oda Y, et al. Risk stratification of advanced colorectal neoplasia after baseline colonoscopy: cohort study of 17 Japanese community practices. Dig Endosc. 2020; 32:106–113.
Article
39. Park SK, Hwang SW, Kim KO, et al. Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasm in patients with more than 10 adenomas on index colonoscopy: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 32:803–808.
Article
40. Grover S, Kastrinos F, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prevalence and phenotypes of APC and MUTYH mutations in patients with multiple colorectal adenomas. JAMA. 2012; 308:485–492.
Article
41. Syngal S, Brand RE, Church JM, et al. ACG clinical guideline: genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110:223–262.
Article
42. Provenzale D, Gupta S, Ahnen DJ, et al. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016; 14:1010–1030.
Article
43. Myers DJ, Arora K. Villous adenoma [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing: 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 26]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470272/.
44. Fairley KJ, Li J, Komar M, Steigerwalt N, Erlich P. Predicting the risk of recurrent adenoma and incident colorectal cancer based on findings of the baseline colonoscopy. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2014; 5:e64.
Article
45. van Heijningen EM, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Kuipers EJ, et al. Features of adenoma and colonoscopy associated with recurrent colorectal neoplasia based on a large community-based study. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144:1410–1418.
Article
46. Song M, Emilsson L, Bozorg SR, et al. Risk of colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after polypectomy: a Swedish record-linkage study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 5:537–547.
Article
47. Saini SD, Kim HM, Schoenfeld P. Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64:614–626.
Article
48. Mahajan D, Downs-Kelly E, Liu X, et al. Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm: implications for endoscopic surveillance. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013; 37:427–433.
Article
49. Foss FA, Milkins S, McGregor AH. Inter-observer variability in the histological assessment of colorectal polyps detected through the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Histopathology. 2012; 61:47–52.
Article
50. Amersi F, Agustin M, Ko CY. Colorectal cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, and health services. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005; 18:133–140.
Article
51. Macaron C, Vu HT, Lopez R, Pai RK, Burke CA. Risk of metachronous polyps in individuals with serrated polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58:762–768.
Article
52. Erichsen R, Baron JA, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, et al. Increased risk of colorectal cancer development among patients with serrated polyps. Gastroenterology. 2016; 150:895–902.
Article
53. Holme Ø, Bretthauer M, Eide TJ, et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer in individuals with serrated polyps. Gut. 2015; 64:929–936.
Article
54. Lu FI, van Niekerk de W, Owen D, Tha SP, Turbin DA, Webber DL. Longitudinal outcome study of sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum: an increased risk for subsequent right-sided colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010; 34:927–934.
Article
55. Symonds E, Anwar S, Young G, et al. Sessile serrated polyps with synchronous conventional adenomas increase risk of future advanced neoplasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2019; 64:1680–1685.
Article
56. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Robinson CM, Weiss JE, Amos C, Srivastava A. Risk of metachronous high-risk adenomas and large serrated polyps in individuals with serrated polyps on index colonoscopy: data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastroenterology. 2018; 154:117–127.
Article
57. Teriaky A, Driman DK, Chande N. Outcomes of a 5-year follow-up of patients with sessile serrated adenomas. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47:178–183.
Article
58. Schreiner MA, Weiss DG, Lieberman DA. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139:1497–1502.
Article
59. Lazarus R, Junttila OE, Karttunen TJ, Mäkinen MJ. The risk of metachronous neoplasia in patients with serrated adenoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005; 123:349–359.
Article
60. Yoon JY, Kim HT, Hong SP, et al. High-risk metachronous polyps are more frequent in patients with traditional serrated adenomas than in patients with conventional adenomas: a multicenter prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:1087–1093.
Article
61. Payne SR, Church TR, Wandell M, et al. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12:1119–1126.
Article
62. Ensari A, Bilezikçi B, Carneiro F, et al. Serrated polyps of the colon: how reproducible is their classification? Virchows Arch. 2012; 461:495–504.
Article
63. Khalid O, Radaideh S, Cummings OW, O’Brien MJ, Goldblum JR, Rex DK. Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15:3767–3770.
Article
64. Wong NA, Hunt LP, Novelli MR, Shepherd NA, Warren BF. Observer agreement in the diagnosis of serrated polyps of the large bowel. Histopathology. 2009; 55:63–66.
Article
65. Bustamante-Balén M, Bernet L, Cano R, Morell L, López A. Assessing the reproducibility of the microscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma of the colon. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009; 101:258–264.
66. Farris AB, Misdraji J, Srivastava A, et al. Sessile serrated adenoma: challenging discrimination from other serrated colonic polyps. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008; 32:30–35.
67. Hiraoka S, Kato J, Fujiki S, et al. The presence of large serrated polyps increases risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010; 139:1503–1510.
Article
68. Lash RH, Genta RM, Schuler CM. Sessile serrated adenomas: prevalence of dysplasia and carcinoma in 2139 patients. J Clin Pathol. 2010; 63:681–686.
Article
69. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:1218–1224.
Article
70. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143:844–857.
Article
71. Lim HM, Kim ER, Kim JY, et al. Association between non-diminutive hyperplastic polyps and synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasms. Digestion. 2011; 83:54–59.
Article
72. Pereyra L, Zamora R, Gómez EJ, et al. Risk of metachronous advanced neoplastic lesions in patients with sporadic sessile serrated adenomas undergoing colonoscopic surveillance. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111:871–878.
Article
73. Burnett-Hartman AN, Chubak J, Hua X, et al. The association between colorectal sessile serrated adenomas/polyps and subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Causes Control. 2019; 30:979–987.
Article
74. Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144:74–80.
Article
75. Belderbos TD, Leenders M, Moons LM, Siersema PD. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2014; 46:388–402.
Article
76. Pellise M, Burgess NG, Tutticci N, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: a prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesions. Gut. 2017; 66:644–653.
Article
77. Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, et al. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85:647–656.
Article
78. Komeda Y, Watanabe T, Sakurai T, et al. Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25:1502–1512.
Article
79. Klein A, Tate DJ, Jayasekeran V, et al. Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156:604–613.
Article
80. Jang HW, Park SJ, Hong SP, Cheon JH, Kim WH, Kim TI. Risk factors for recurrent high-risk polyps after the removal of high-risk polyps at initial colonoscopy. Yonsei Med J. 2015; 56:1559–1565.
Article
81. Park SK, Kim NH, Jung YS, et al. Risk of developing advanced colorectal neoplasia after removing high-risk adenoma detected at index colonoscopy in young patients: a KASID study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 31:138–144.
Article
82. Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136:832–841.
Article
83. Jacobs ET, Gupta S, Baron JA, et al. Family history of colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives and metachronous colorectal adenoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113:899–905.
Article
84. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Harford WV, et al. Five-year colon surveillance after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2007; 133:1077–1085.
Article
85. Chung SJ, Kim YS, Yang SY, et al. Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans. Gut. 2011; 60:1537–1543.
Article
86. Lee JK, Jensen CD, Levin TR, et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer and related death after adenoma removal in a large, community-based population. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158:884–894.
Article
87. Løberg M, Kalager M, Holme Ø, Hoff G, Adami HO, Bretthauer M. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371:799–807.
Article
88. Hassan C, Gimeno-García A, Kalager M, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the incidence of advanced neoplasia after polypectomy in patients with and without low-risk adenomas. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014; 39:905–912.
Article
89. Dubé C, Yakubu M, McCurdy BR, et al. Risk of advanced adenoma, colorectal cancer, and colorectal cancer mortality in people with low-risk adenomas at baseline colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112:1790–1801.
Article
90. Atkin W, Brenner A, Martin J, et al. The clinical effectiveness of different surveillance strategies to prevent colorectal cancer in people with intermediate-grade colorectal adenomas: a retrospective cohort analysis, and psychological and economic evaluations. Health Technol Assess. 2017; 21:1–536.
Article
91. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326:658–662.
Article
92. Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, Beck GJ. Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51(4 Pt 1):433–437.
Article
93. Jung YS, Park DI, Kim WH, et al. Risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia according to the number of high-risk findings at index colonoscopy: a Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (KASID) Study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61:1661–1668.
Article
94. Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, et al. Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156:1661–1674.
Article
95. Mankaney G, Rouphael C, Burke CA. Serrated polyposis syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18:777–779.
Article
96. Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA, et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107:1315–1329.
Article
97. Tan YY, Tay GS, Wong YJ, et al. Clinical features and predictors of dysplasia in proximal sessile serrated lesions. Clin Endosc. 2021; 54:578–588.
Article
98. Tran AH, Man Ngor EW, Wu BU. Surveillance colonoscopy in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174:1675–1682.
99. Gutta A, Gromski MA. Endoscopic management of post-polypectomy bleeding. Clin Endosc. 2020; 53:302–310.
Article
Full Text Links
  • IR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2023 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr