Ann Rehabil Med.  2022 Oct;46(5):237-247. 10.5535/arm.22039.

Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Esophageal Barium Residue After Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
  • 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea

Abstract


Objective
To investigate esophageal motility disorders in patients with esophageal residual barium on chest x-rays after videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) through high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM).
Methods
We reviewed the records of 432 patients who underwent VFSS from September 2019 to May 2021, and 85 patients (19.7%) with large residual barium (diameter ≥1 cm) were included. As a result of HREM, motility disorders were classified as major or minor motility disorders according. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and chest computed tomography results available were also reviewed.
Results
Among 85 patients with large residual barium in the esophagus, 16 patients (18.8%) underwent HREM. Abnormal esophageal motilities were identified in 68.8% patient: three patients (18.8%) had major motility disorders—achalasia (n=1), esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (n=2)—and eight patients (50%) had minor motility disorders—ineffective esophageal motility (n=7), fragmented peristalsis (n=1). In those with normal esophageal motility, three patients of esophageal structure disorders (18.8%)—esophageal cancer (n=1), cardiogenic dysphagia (n=1), slight narrowing without obstruction of EGJ (n=1)—and two patients (12.5%) with chronic atrophic gastritis (n=2) were confirmed.
Conclusion
Esophageal motility disorders were identified in 68.8% of 16 patients with large esophageal residual barium with three patients in the major and eight patients in the minor categories. Residual barium in the esophagus was not rare and can be a sign of significant esophageal motility disorders.

Keyword

Deglutition disorders; Esophageal motility disorders; Endoscopy; Manometry

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Inclusion flow chart. VFSS, videofluoroscopic swallowing study; HREM, high-resolution esophageal manometry; EGJ, esophagogastric junction.

  • Fig. 2 Barium residues on chest X-rays taken after VFSS. (A) Barium content in the stomach with no residual esophageal barium (no barium group). (B) Small residual barium in the esophagus (<1 cm). End-level of esophageal barium was located 18.2 cm from T1 upper margin. (C) Large residual barium in the esophagus (barium ≥1 cm). End-level of esophageal barium was located 24.0 cm from T1 upper margin.

  • Fig. 3 Achalasia (case no#1). (A) Residual barium with a diameter of 2.5 cm was observed in the esophagus on chest X-ray. The end-level of the esophageal barium was located 23.0 cm from the T1 upper margin. Due to the fixed instrument, the bird beak sign is difficult to identify. (B) On esophageal manometry, impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure >15 mmHg), absent peristalsis, and panesophageal pressurization were observed, which are reasonable findings for type II achalasia. (C) For the treatment of esophageal dysphagia due to achalasia, a balloon-catheter dilatation was performed at the esophagogastric junction.

  • Fig. 4 Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (case no#2). (A) Residual barium with a diameter of 1.8 cm was observed in the esophagus on chest X-ray. The end-level of esophageal barium was located 24.0 cm from the T1 upper margin. (B) On esophageal manometry, impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (integrated relaxation pressure >15 mmHg) but peristalsis was observed, which are reasonable findings for EGJ outflow obstruction.

  • Fig. 5 Esophageal cancer (case no#12). (A) Residual barium with a diameter of 1.1 cm was observed in the esophagus on chest X-ray. The end-level of esophageal barium was located 13.0 cm from the T1 upper margin. A filling defect of the barium was observed for a length of 4.5 cm below the distal end of the barium, which was the middle thoracic esophageal level. (B) On esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and (C) chest computed tomography, a cancer narrowing the lumen was observed at the middle thoracic esophageal level, which corresponds to the chest X-ray. (D) To palliate esophageal obstruction caused by cancer, stent insertion was performed through EGD.


Reference

1. Triadafilopoulos G, Hallstone A, Nelson-Abbott H, Bedinger K. Oropharyngeal and esophageal interrelationships in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 1992; 37:551–7.
Article
2. Liu LW, Andrews CN, Armstrong D, Diamant N, Jaffer N, Lazarescu A, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the assessment of uninvestigated esophageal dysphagia. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2018; 1:5–19.
Article
3. Cockeram AW. Canadian Association of Gastroenterology practice guidelines: evaluation of dysphagia. Can J Gastroenterol. 1998; 12:409–13.
Article
4. Yoon SW, Kim KW, Park HJ, Kim EK, Yu JS, Seo JK, et al. The usefulness of esophagogram with marshmallow bolus in patients with esophageal-related symptoms. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1996; 34:399–404.
Article
5. Smith DF, Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Chen MY. Lower esophageal mucosal ring: correlation of referred symptoms with radiographic findings using a marshmallow bolus. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171:1361–5.
Article
6. Min YK, Baek S, Kang EK, Nam SJ. Characteristics of patients with esophageal dysphagia assessed by chest x-ray imaging after videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2020; 44:38–47.
Article
7. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27:160–74.
Article
8. Blonski W, Kumar A, Feldman J, Richter JE. Timed barium swallow: diagnostic role and predictive value in untreated achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, and non-achalasia dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018; 113:196–203.
Article
9. Kostic S, Andersson M, Hellstrom M, Lonroth H, Lundell L. Timed barium esophagogram in the assessment of patients with achalasia: reproducibility and observer variation. Dis Esophagus. 2005; 18:96–103.
Article
10. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996; 11:93–8.
Article
11. Park J, Yoo W, Yoo B. Standard recipes for the preparation of thickened barium liquids used in the diagnosis of dysphagia. Clin Nutr Res. 2019; 8:265–71.
Article
12. Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, Blackwell JN, Nelson JL, Castell JA, et al. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers: variability of pressures with age and frequency of “abnormal” contractions. Dig Dis Sci. 1987; 32:583–92.
13. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Patel RS, Mulcahy HE, Barkun A, Jowell P, et al. The yield and the predictors of esophageal pathology when upper endoscopy is used for the initial evaluation of dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61:804–8.
Article
14. Qureshi NA, Hallissey MT, Fielding JW. Outcome of index upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients presenting with dysphagia in a tertiary care hospital: a 10 years review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2007; 7:43.
15. Spieker MR. Evaluating dysphagia. Am Fam Physician. 2000; 61:3639–48.
16. Lin SH, Chang JY. Esophageal cancer: diagnosis and management. Chin J Cancer. 2010; 29:843–54.
Article
17. Park J, Baek S, Kim G, Nam SJ, Cho BR. Dysphagia secondary to esophageal compression in a patient with decompensated heart failure. Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2022; 22:146–51.
Article
18. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Kaufman E, Obrecht S, Fox M. Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011; 23:509-e198.
Article
19. Xiao Y, Nicodeme F, Kahrilas PJ, Roman S, Lin Z, Pandolfino JE. Optimizing the swallow protocol of clinical high-resolution esophageal manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012; 24:e489–96.
Article
20. Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Prakash Gyawali C, Roman S, et al. Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021; 33:e14058.
21. Shinjo Y, Okitsu A, Ukeda I, Miyagi A, Domen K, Koyama T. Effects of posture on subjective swallowing difficulty during screening tests for dysphagia. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 1:133.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr