Int J Heart Fail.  2021 Jul;3(3):179-193. 10.36628/ijhf.2021.0008.

Rhythm Control of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Systolic Heart Failure: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
  • 1Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiac Sciences and Research, Bengaluru, India
  • 3Department of Cardiology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, India
  • 4Department of Medicine, New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
  • 5Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
  • 6Department of Cardiology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • 7Piedmont Healthcare, Greater Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) with heart failure (HF) arguably constitutes the sickest subset of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients.
Methods
A systematic search was made in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Network meta-analysis (NMA) of PeAF patients with systolic HF comparing all-cause mortality, change in HF-related quality of life (QoL) and hospitalization due to heart failure (HHF) were performed among catheter ablation (CA) of AF, rate-controlling drugs (RCDs), anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs), and atrio-ventricular nodal ablation (AVNA) using Bayesian random effect model.
Results
Ablation strategies resulted significantly lower mortality than medical therapies (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.76). CA of AF was associated with lower trend of mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.08 to 7.63) in comparison to AVNA in the Bayesian NMA. Rhythm control strategies resulted significantly higher improvement of QoL than rate control strategies (mean difference [MD], −12.78; 95% CI, −21.26 to −4.31). Bayesian NMA showed that CA of AF was better than AAD (MD, −7.98; 95% CrI, −27.68 to 8.27), however ranked AVNA to be lowest. Ablation strategies provided significantly lower HHF than medical therapies (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.58). Bayesian NMA showed that CA of AF performed not only better than AAD (OR, 0.33; 95% CrI, 0.09 to 1.3) to reduce HHF, but also than AVNA (OR, 0.20; 95% CrI, 0.00 to 4.76). Of note, RCD ranked lowest with regard to mortality and HHF.
Conclusions
CA of AF remains the best strategy even for the sickest group of PeAF patients with systolic HF in regards to all-cause mortality, HF-related QoL and HHF.

Keyword

Persistent atrial fibrillation; Heart failure; Catheter ablation
Full Text Links
  • IJHF
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr