J Korean Foot Ankle Soc.  2022 Jun;26(2):59-65. 10.14193/jkfas.2022.26.2.59.

What is the Significance of the Posterior Malleolus in Ankle Fractures?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea

Abstract

The posterior malleolar fracture is relatively common fracture of the foot and ankle, but several aspects of this are still controversial. If the posterior malleolus is involved in the ankle fracture, the prognosis is usually poor. A computed tomography scan is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. Although indirect reduction and the anterior to posterior screw fixation technique have the advantages of a small incision with the requirement of relatively simple skills, direct open reduction and fixation from the posterior side provide a more biomechanically stable and accurate reduction. The precise reduction of the posterior malleolar fragment helps to achieve congruency of the tibia and fibula in the incisura and contributes to syndesmotic stability. It is important to determine the indications for surgical treatment by comprehensively evaluating the three-dimensional structure of the posterior malleolar fracture and all related injuries to the ankle.

Keyword

Posterior malleolus fractures; Trimalleolar fractures; Ankle fractures

Figure

  • Figure. 1 Haraguchi classification of the posterior malleolar fracture. (A) Type-I, the posterolateral-oblique type. (B) Type-II, the medialextension type. (C) Type-III, the small-shell type.

  • Figure. 2 Bartonicek and Rammelt classification of the posterior malleolar fracture. (A) Type 1, extraincisural fragment with an intact fibular notch. (B) Type 2, posterolateral fragment extending into the fibular notch. (C) Type 3, posteromedial two-part fragment involving the medial malleolus. (D) Type 4, large posterolateral triangular fragment involving more than one-third of the notch. Type 5 is used to describe an irregular osteoporotic fracture that does not match of the any other 4 patterns.

  • Figure. 3 Preoperative images. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) ankle plain radiographs. Axial (C) and sagittal (D) computed tomography scans.

  • Figure. 4 Intraoperative findings. (A) The fibula fracture site was spread using a lamina spreader. (B) The posterior malleolar fracture site was approached through the gap between the fibula fragments, and the bony fragment stuck in the joint was removed.

  • Figure. 5 (A) The fibula fracture site was reduced using a reduction clamp, and (B) the fibula was fixed with a lag screw. (C) While maintaining reduction by pushing the posterior malleolar fragment toward the articular surface with a ball spike pusher, (D) the fragment was fixed in the posterior to anterior direction with a partially threaded screw.

  • Figure. 6 Immediate postoperative anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) ankle plain radiographs. Postoperative 1-year anteroposterior (C) and lateral (D) ankle plain radiographs. The articular surfaces are well preserved and there is no evidence of post-traumatic arthritis.


Reference

1. Heim D, Niederhauser K, Simbrey N. 2010; The Volkmann dogma: a retrospective, long-term, single-center study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 36:515–9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-0061-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-010-0061-6. PMID: 26816305.
Article
2. Jaskulka RA, Ittner G, Schedl R. 1989; Fractures of the posterior tibial margin: their role in the prognosis of malleolar fractures. J Trauma. 29:1565–70. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198911000-00018. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198911000-00018. PMID: 2585569.
3. Broos PL, Bisschop AP. 1991; Operative treatment of ankle fractures in adults: correlation between types of fracture and final results. Injury. 22:403–6. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90106-o. DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(91)90106-o. PMID: 1806506.
Article
4. Lindsjö U. Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (199):28–38. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198510000-00005. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198510000-00005. PMID: 3930122.
5. Earle H. 1828; Simple, succeeded by compound dislocation forwards, of the inferior extremity of the tibia, with fracture of its posterior edge, comminuted fracture of the fibula, amputation of the leg, and death. Lancet. 29:346–8.
6. Ludloff K. 1926; [Zur Frage der Knöchelbrüche mit Heraussprengung eines hinteren Volkmannschen Dreiecks]. Zentralbl Chir. 53:390–1. German.
7. von Volkmann R. [Beiträge zur Chirurgie: anschliessend an einen Bericht über die Thätigkeit der chirurgischen Universitäts-klinik zu Halle im Jahre 1873]. Breitkopf und Härtel;Leipzig: 1875. German.
8. Destot E. [Traumatismes du pied et rayons x: malléoles, astragale, calcanéum, avant-pied]. Masson;Paris: 1911. French.
9. Henderson M. 1932; Trimalleolar fracture of the ankle. Surg Clin North Am. 12:867–72.
10. Nelson M, Jensen N. 1940; The treatment of trimalleolar fractures of the ankle. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 71:509–14.
11. Ferries JS, DeCoster TA, Firoozbakhsh KK, Garcia JF, Miller RA. 1994; Plain radiographic interpretation in trimalleolar ankle fractures poorly assesses posterior fragment size. J Orthop Trauma. 8:328–31. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199408000-00009. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199408000-00009. PMID: 7965295.
Article
12. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M, Naňka O. 2015; Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 41:587–600. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0560-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-015-0560-6. PMID: 26253884.
Article
13. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kostlivý K, Vaněček V, Klika D, Trešl I. 2015; Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 135:505–16. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4. PMID: 25708027.
Article
14. Büchler L, Tannast M, Bonel HM, Weber M. 2009; Reliability of radiologic assessment of the fracture anatomy at the posterior tibial plafond in malleolar fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 23:208–12. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819b0b23. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819b0b23. PMID: 19516096.
Article
15. Rammelt S, Heim D, Hofbauer LC, Grass R, Zwipp H. 2011; [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures]. Unfallchirurg. 114:847–60. German. doi: 10.1007/s00113-011-1978-x. DOI: 10.1007/s00113-011-1978-x. PMID: 21779900.
16. Xu HL, Li X, Zhang DY, Fu ZG, Wang TB, Zhang PX, et al. 2012; A retrospective study of posterior malleolus fractures. Int Orthop. 36:1929–36. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1591-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1591-9. PMID: 22777382. PMCID: PMC3427438.
Article
17. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P. [Classification AO des fractures]. Vol. 1, Les os longs:Springer-Verlag;Berlin: 1987. French. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-06263-0_1.
18. Heim UF. 1989; Trimalleolar fractures: late results after fixation of the posterior fragment. Orthopedics. 12:1053–9. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19890801-05. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19890801-05. PMID: 2771825.
Article
19. Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, Kato F. 2006; Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88:1085–92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00856. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1835. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00856. PMID: 16651584.
Article
20. Klammer G, Kadakia AR, Joos DA, Seybold JD, Espinosa N. 2013; Posterior pilon fractures: a retrospective case series and proposed classification system. Foot Ankle Int. 34:189–99. doi: 10.1177/1071100712469334. DOI: 10.1177/1071100712469334. PMID: 23413057.
21. Switaj PJ, Weatherford B, Fuchs D, Rosenthal B, Pang E, Kadakia AR. 2014; Evaluation of posterior malleolar fractures and the posterior pilon variant in operatively treated ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 35:886–95. doi: 10.1177/1071100714537630. DOI: 10.1177/1071100714537630. PMID: 24942618.
Article
22. Mason LW, Marlow WJ, Widnall J, Molloy AP. 2017; Pathoanatomy and associated injuries of posterior malleolus fracture of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 38:1229–35. doi: 10.1177/1071100717719533. DOI: 10.1177/1071100717719533. PMID: 28758439.
Article
23. Rammelt S, Bartoníček J. 2020; Posterior malleolar fractures: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 8:e19. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00207. PMID: 32960029.
24. Heim U. 1982; [Indications and technic for the stabilization of the posterior Volkmann's triangle in malleolar fractures]. Unfallheilkunde. 85:388–94. German.
25. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group. 3rd ed. Springer;Berlin: 1991. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-02695-3.
26. Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. 2018; When and how to operate the posterior malleolus fragment in trimalleolar fractures: a systematic literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 138:1213–22. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2949-2. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2949-2. PMID: 29752537.
Article
27. Hoogendoorn JM. 2017; Posterior malleolar open reduction and internal fixation through a posterolateral approach for trimalleolar fractures. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 7:e31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00016. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00016. PMID: 30233966. PMCID: PMC6132997.
Article
28. Verhage SM, Krijnen P, Schipper IB, Hoogendoorn JM. 2019; Persistent postoperative step-off of the posterior malleolus leads to higher incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis in trimalleolar fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 139:323–9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3056-0. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-3056-0. PMID: 30430238. PMCID: PMC6394475.
Article
29. Blom RP, Meijer DT, de Muinck Keizer RO, Stufkens SAS, Sierevelt IN, Schepers T, et al. 2019; Posterior malleolar fracture morphology determines outcome in rotational type ankle fractures. Injury. 50:1392–7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.003. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.003. PMID: 31176480.
Article
30. Blom RP, Hayat B, Al-Dirini RMA, Sierevelt I, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Goslings JC, et al. Posterior malleolar ankle fractures. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B:1229–41. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2019-1660.R1. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2019-1660.R1. PMID: 32862684.
Article
31. Miller AN, Carroll EA, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. 2010; Posterior malleolar stabilization of syndesmotic injuries is equivalent to screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468:1129–35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1111-4. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1111-4. PMID: 19798540. PMCID: PMC2835618.
Article
32. Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M. 2017; Posterior malleolar fractures: changing concepts and recent developments. Foot Ankle Clin. 22:125–45. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2016.09.009. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2016.09.009. PMID: 28167058.
33. Solan MC, Sakellariou A. Posterior malleolus fractures: worth fixing. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B:1413–9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2017-1072. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2017-1072. PMID: 29092978.
34. Weber M. 2004; Trimalleolar fractures with impaction of the posteromedial tibial plafond: implications for talar stability. Foot Ankle Int. 25:716–27. doi: 10.1177/107110070402501005. DOI: 10.1177/107110070402501005. PMID: 15566703.
Article
35. Bois AJ, Dust W. 2008; Posterior fracture dislocation of the ankle: technique and clinical experience using a posteromedial surgical approach. J Orthop Trauma. 22:629–36. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318184ba4e. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318184ba4e. PMID: 18827593.
Article
36. Zhong S, Shen L, Zhao JG, Chen J, Xie JF, Shi Q, et al. 2017; Comparison of posteromedial versus posterolateral approach for posterior malleolus fixation in trimalleolar ankle fractures. Orthop Surg. 9:69–76. doi: 10.1111/os.12308. DOI: 10.1111/os.12308. PMID: 28371502. PMCID: PMC6584429.
Article
37. Tejwani NC, Pahk B, Egol KA. 2010; Effect of posterior malleolus fracture on outcome after unstable ankle fracture. J Trauma. 69:666–9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e4f81e. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e4f81e. PMID: 20838137.
Article
38. Mingo-Robinet J, López-Durán L, Galeote JE, Martinez-Cervell C. 2011; Ankle fractures with posterior malleolar fragment: management and results. J Foot Ankle Surg. 50:141–5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.12.013. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.12.013. PMID: 21353996.
Article
39. Langenhuijsen JF, Heetveld MJ, Ultee JM, Steller EP, Butzelaar RM. 2002; Results of ankle fractures with involvement of the posterior tibial margin. J Trauma. 53:55–60. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200207000-00012. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200207000-00012. PMID: 12131390.
Article
40. Evers J, Barz L, Wähnert D, Grüneweller N, Raschke MJ, Ochman S. 2015; Size matters: the influence of the posterior fragment on patient outcomes in trimalleolar ankle fractures. Injury. 46 Suppl 4:S109–13. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30028-0. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30028-0. PMID: 26542855.
Article
41. De Vries JS, Wijgman AJ, Sierevelt IN, Schaap GR. 2005; Long-term results of ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment. J Foot Ankle Surg. 44:211–7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2005.02.002. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2005.02.002. PMID: 15940600.
Article
42. Levack AE, Warner SJ, Gausden EB, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. 2018; Comparing functional outcomes after injury-specific fixation of posterior malleolar fractures and equivalent ligamentous injuries in rotational ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 32:e123–8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001104. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001104. PMID: 29401086.
Article
43. Odak S, Ahluwalia R, Unnikrishnan P, Hennessy M, Platt S. 2016; Management of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 55:140–5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.001. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.001. PMID: 26100091.
Article
44. Berkes MB, Little MT, Lazaro LE, Pardee NC, Schottel PC, Helfet DL, et al. 2013; Articular congruity is associated with short-term clinical outcomes of operatively treated SER IV ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 95:1769–75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00949. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00949. PMID: 24088969.
Article
45. Kang C, Hwang DS, Lee JK, Won Y, Song JH, Lee GS. 2019; Screw fixation of the posterior malleolus fragment in ankle fracture. Foot Ankle Int. 40:1288–94. doi: 10.1177/1071100719865895. DOI: 10.1177/1071100719865895. PMID: 31387392.
Article
46. Drijfhout van Hooff CC, Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM. 2015; Influence of fragment size and postoperative joint congruency on long-term outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 36:673–8. doi: 10.1177/1071100715570895. DOI: 10.1177/1071100715570895. PMID: 25672944.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKFAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr