Healthc Inform Res.  2022 Apr;28(2):105-111. 10.4258/hir.2022.28.2.105.

Prospects of Hospital Information Systems and Patient Safety in Japan

• Nagoshi K
• Watari T
• Matsumura Y

• KMID: 2529792
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2022.28.2.105

Abstract

Objectives
Approximately 20 years have passed since hospital information systems (HISs) featuring full-scale electronic medical records were first implemented in Japan. Patient safety is one of the most important of the several “safety” roles that HISs are expected to fulfill. However, insufficient research has analyzed the contribution of HISs to patient safety. This paper reviews the history of HISs in connection with patient safety in Japan and discusses the future of the patient safety function of HISs in a favorable environment for digitization.
Methods
A review on the history of HISs with functions that contribute to patient safety was conducted, analyzing evidence from reports published by the Japanese government and papers on patient safety and HISs published in various countries.
Results
Patient safety has become a concern, and initiatives to promote patient safety have progressed simultaneously with the spread of HISs. To address the problem of patient safety, most large hospitals prioritize patients’ welfare when building HISs. However, no HIS-associated reduction in adverse events due to medical treatment could be confirmed.
Conclusions
HISs are expected to help prevent medical accidents, such as patient- and drug-related errors. It is hoped that the patient safety functions of HISs will become generalized and contribute to patient safety in the future. To achieve this, the government and academic societies should provide regulations and guidelines on HISs and patient safety to the medical community and medical-device vendors. Furthermore, departments responsible for HISs and patient safety should collaborate to gather evidence for the effectiveness of HISs.

Keyword

Hospital Information Systems; Electronic Medical Records; Electronic Health Records; Patient Safety; Safety Management

Reference

References

1. Ministry of Health. Labour and Welfare. Survey of medical institutions [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2017. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.e-stat.go.jp/statistics/00450021 .

2. Ministry of Education. Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Medical education model core curriculum [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology;2016. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shin-gi/chousa/koutou/033-2/toushin/1383962.htm .

3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. About storage of medical records by electronic media (Japan Notification No. 517 of Health Policy Bureau) [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health and Welfare;1999. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/www1/houdou/1104/h0423-1_10.html .

4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Guidelines for safety management of medical information systems version 5.1 [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;c2021. [cited at 2022Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/0000516275.html .

5. Tsukuma H, Ishikawa K, Tanaka T, Ikeuchi M, Kusuoka H, Umesato Y, et al. Evaluation on computerization of medical process from the viewpoint of patient safety. Jap J Med Inform. 2013; 33(4):201–10.

6. Matsumura Y, Inoue T, Miyo K, Watanabe K, Takizawa M, Tanaka H, et al. Countermeasures for oversight of image reports and required system functions. Jap J Med Inform. 2020; 39(5):231–8.

7. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Medical safety measures [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;c2021. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunit-suite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryou/i-anzen/index.html .

8. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Comprehensive measures for medical safety promotion [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2002. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2001/0110/dl/tp1030-1c.pdf .

9. Matsumura Y. Research on measures to disseminate the functions of hospital information systems that contribute to patient safety (Project No. H30-iryo-shitei-020) [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2018. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://mhlw-grants.niph.go.jp/project/27426 .

10. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Annual report of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2004 [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2004. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/wp/hakusyo/kousei/04/ .

11. Japan Medical Association Medical Safety Measures Committee. Report on risk management in medical care [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Medical Association;1998. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.med.or.jp/anzen/data/anzen1003.html .

12. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Medical education model core curriculum [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology;2001. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: http://www.medic.mie-u.ac.jp/meduc/data/modelcore-education.pdf .

13. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): National Academies Press;2000.

14. Institute of Medicine Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information. Technology Health IT and patient safety. Washington (DC): National Academies Press;2011.

15. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Final report of the Standard Electronic Medical Record Committee [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2005. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2005/05/s0517-4.html .

16. Ohara M, Kusuoka H. Background and method of “Checklist for introducing HIS related to patient safety” and “Medical IT and clinical indicators related to patient safety. ” Patient Saf Promot J. 2015; 40:80–6.

17. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Patient safety global ministerial summit 2018 [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2018. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/psgms2018/ .

18. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. IHI global trigger tool for measuring adverse events [Internet]. Cambridge (MA): Institute for Healthcare Improvement;c2022. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/IHIGlobalTriggerToolforMeasuringAEs.aspx .

19. van der Linden CM, Jansen PA, Grouls RJ, van Marum RJ, Verberne MA, Aussems LM, et al. Systems that prevent unwanted represcription of drugs withdrawn because of adverse drug events: a systematic review. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2013; 4(2):73–90.

20. Ojeleye O, Avery A, Gupta V, Boyd M. The evidence for the effectiveness of safety alerts in electronic patient medication record systems at the point of pharmacy order entry: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013; 13:69.

21. Meeks DW, Takian A, Sittig DF, Singh H, Barber N. Exploring the sociotechnical intersection of patient safety and electronic health record implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21(e1):e28–34.

22. Ford EW, Silvera GA, Kazley AS, Diana ML, Huerta TR. Assessing the relationship between patient safety culture and EHR strategy. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016; 29(6):614–27.

23. Brenner SK, Kaushal R, Grinspan Z, Joyce C, Kim I, Allard RJ, et al. Effects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23(5):1016–36.

24. Alotaibi YK, Federico F. The impact of health information technology on patient safety. Saudi Med J. 2017; 38(12):1173–80.

25. Kim MO, Coiera E, Magrabi F. Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(2):246–50.

26. Sittig DF, Wright A, Coiera E, Magrabi F, Ratwani R, Bates DW, et al. Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J. 2020; 26(1):181–9.

27. Subbe CP, Tellier G, Barach P. Impact of electronic health records on predefined safety outcomes in patients admitted to hospital: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(1):e047446.

28. Cabinet Secretariat of Japan. Report of the study group on standard hospital information systems [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Cabinet Secretariat;2019. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/kenkouiryou/jisedai_kiban/pdf/20191129_iryoujyoho_sistem_houkoku.pdf .

29. Japan Council for Quality Health Care. Project to collect medical near-miss/adverse event information: 2020 annual report [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Council for Quality Health Care;2021. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.med-safe.jp/contents/year-report/index.html .

30. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. About measures in confirmation of diagnostic imaging report (Notification of Medical Safety Promotion Office) [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2019. [cited at 2022 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10800000/000575997.pdf .