Ann Surg Treat Res.  2022 Mar;102(3):139-146. 10.4174/astr.2022.102.3.139.

Unfavorable effect of high postoperative fluid balance on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Despite the many efforts to overcome postoperative complications, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still accompanied with considerable concerns of lethal complications. The clinical factors are known to affect postoperative outcomes such as diameter of pancreatic duct, texture of pancreas, and comorbidity of the patients are mostly uncorrectable. Thus, investigation for correctable risk factors is required. Recently, perioperative fluid volume was reported to be associated with complications after PD. This study aims to determine the relationship between postoperative fluid balance and surgical outcome after open PD.
Methods
We reviewed, retrospectively, 172 consecutive patients who underwent open PD in a single institution between 2015 and 2019. The status of perioperative fluid balance 2 days after surgery and clinical factors were investigated to determine the association with postoperative outcome including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). According to postoperative fluid balance, patients were divided into high- and low-balance groups, and clinical features and surgical outcomes were compared between both groups. Multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors for POPF.
Results
The percentage of morbidity and the incidence of POPF were higher in the high-balance group compared to the low-balance group (61.6% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.001; 15.1% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.009). High postoperative fluid balance and the presence cardiovascular disease were correlated with POPF on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 4.574; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.229–17.029; P = 0.023 and OR, 3.517; 95% CI, 1.209–12.017; P = 0.045).
Conclusion
Higher amount of postoperative fluid balance and the presence of cardiovascular disease are associated with POPF after PD.

Keyword

Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Water-electrolyte balance

Reference

1. Hu BY, Wan T, Zhang WZ, Dong JH. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: analysis of 539 successive cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22:7797–7805. PMID: 27678363.
Article
2. Ellis RJ, Brock Hewitt D, Liu JB, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, et al. Preoperative risk evaluation for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2019; 119:1128–1134. PMID: 30951614.
Article
3. Utsumi M, Aoki H, Nagahisa S, Nishimura S, Une Y, Kimura Y, et al. Preoperative predictive factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: usefulness of the CONUT score. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020; 99:18–25. PMID: 32676478.
Article
4. Eng OS, Goswami J, Moore D, Chen C, Gannon CJ, August DA, et al. Intraoperative fluid administration is associated with perioperative outcomes in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center retrospective analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 108:242–247. PMID: 23907788.
Article
5. Wright GP, Koehler TJ, Davis AT, Chung MH. The drowning whipple: perioperative fluid balance and outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110:407–411. PMID: 24861716.
Article
6. Wang S, Wang X, Dai H, Han J, Li N, Li J. The effect of intraoperative fluid volume administration on pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Invest Surg. 2014; 27:88–94. PMID: 24665844.
Article
7. Han IW, Kim H, Heo J, Oh MG, Choi YS, Lee SE, et al. Excess intraoperative fluid volume administration is associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96:e6893. PMID: 28562540.
8. Kulemann B, Fritz M, Glatz T, Marjanovic G, Sick O, Hopt UT, et al. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with higher amounts of intra- and postoperative fluid therapy: a single center retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017; 16:23–29. PMID: 28289542.
Article
9. Weinberg L, Ianno D, Churilov L, Chao I, Scurrah N, Rachbuch C, et al. Restrictive intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm improves outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0183313. PMID: 28880931.
Article
10. Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, Grass F, Perinel J, Adham M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations 2019. World J Surg. 2020; 44:2056–2084. PMID: 32161987.
Article
11. Shen Y, Cai G, Gong S, Yan J. Perioperative fluid restriction in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019; 43:2747–2755. PMID: 31332489.
Article
12. Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:2263–2274. PMID: 29742967.
Article
13. Myles P, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Wallace S, Peyton P, et al. Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery (RELIEF): rationale and design for a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2017; 7:e015358.
Article
14. Pulvirenti A, Ramera M, Bassi C. Modifications in the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 2:107. PMID: 29354764.
Article
15. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007; 142:761–768. PMID: 17981197.
Article
16. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007; 142:20–25. PMID: 17629996.
Article
17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240:205–213. PMID: 15273542.
18. Kwon HJ, Ha HT, Choi YY, Kim SG. The effects of the end-to-side inverted mattress pancreaticojejunostomy on postoperative pancreatic fistula: a single surgeon’s experience. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 89:61–67. PMID: 26236694.
Article
19. Lee JY, Kim EY, Lee JS, Lee SH, Na GH, Hong TH, et al. A novel pancreaticogastrostomy method using only two transpancreatic sutures: early postoperative surgical results compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 88:299–305. PMID: 26029674.
Article
20. Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery. 2006; 26:131–136. PMID: 16518804.
Article
21. Grant FM, Protic M, Gonen M, Allen P, Brennan MF. Intraoperative fluid management and complications following pancreatectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 107:529–535. PMID: 23136127.
Article
22. Grant F, Brennan MF, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Kingham TP, D'Angelica M, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of liberal vs restricted perioperative fluid management in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 2016; 264:591–598. PMID: 27355261.
Article
23. Sandini M, Fernández-Del Castillo C, Ferrone CR, Ruscic KJ, Eikermann M, Warshaw AL, et al. Intraoperative fluid administration and surgical outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: external validation at a tertiary referral center. World J Surg. 2019; 43:929–936. PMID: 30377724.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr