Lab Med Online.  2021 Jan;11(1):55-59. 10.47429/lmo.2021.11.1.55.

Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of the Norudia GA Glycoalbumin Test

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Blood biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of diabetes mellitus include fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, glycoalbumin (GA), fructosamine, and 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol levels. GA has a half-life of approximately three weeks, and its levels are useful for assessing short-term changes in glycemic control. Herein, we evaluated the performance of the Norudia GA assay kit (Sekisui Medical, Japan) using a Roche Modular E170 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany). We evaluated the precision and linearity of the assay in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP05-A3 and EP06-A guidelines, respectively. A comparison of the Norudia GA and Lucica GA-L (Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Japan) methods was performed by Passing-Bablok regression, using blood samples obtained from 121 patients, in accordance with the CLSI guideline EP09-A3. The reference interval for GA concentration was established based on 120 healthy individuals, according to CLSI guideline EP28-A3C. Repeatability (% CV) ranged from 0.9-2.5% and within-laboratory precision was 2.6-4.5% at three levels. Linearity was observed for GA concentration in the performance ranges used (21.4-713.0 μmol/L). In the equation for the correlation between Norudia GA and Lucica GA-L assay results, the slope and y-intercept were 1.014 (95% confidence interval: 1.000-1.045) and -0.017 (95% confidence interval: -0.444- 0.381), respectively. The reference interval was calculated to be 11.2-17.5%.

Keyword

Diabetes mellitus; Glycoalbumin; Norudia GA; Performance

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Linearity of the Norudia GA assay for serum glycoalbumin measurement.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of serum glycoalbumin values measured by Lucica GA-L and Norudia GA kits. (A) Scatter plot. (B) Difference plot.


Cited by  1 articles

음성 간섭을 감소시키도록 개선된 Norudia 당화알부민 시약의 성능평가
Beomki Lee, Sang-Mi Kim, Hyung-Doo Park
Lab Med Online. 2024;14(2):100-105.    doi: 10.47429/lmo.2024.14.2.100.


Reference

1. American Diabetes Association. 2019; Standards of medical care in diabetes-2019 Abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 37:11–34. DOI: 10.2337/cd18-0105. PMID: 30705493. PMCID: PMC6336119.
2. Gonen B, Rubenstein A, Rochman H, Tanega SP, Horwitz DL. 1977; Haemoglobin A1: an indicator of the metabolic control of diabetic patients. Lancet. 2:734–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(77)90237-9.
3. Park HI, Kim YS, Lee J, Kim Y, Shin SJ. 2009; Performance characteristics of glycated albumin and its clinical usefulness in diabetic patients on hemodialysis. Korean J Lab Med. 29:406–14. DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.5.406. PMID: 19893349.
4. Freitas PAC, Ehlert LR, Camargo JL. 2017; Glycated albumin: a potential biomarker in diabetes. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 61:296–304. DOI: 10.1590/2359-3997000000272. PMID: 28699985.
5. Kouzuma T, Uemastu Y, Usami T, Imamura S. 2004; Study of glycated amino acid elimination reaction for an improved enzymatic glycated albumin measurement method. Clin Chim Acta. 346:135–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.02.019. PMID: 15256314.
6. Sato A, Yada S, Hosoba E, Kanno H, Miura H. 2019; Establishment of glycated albumin unit conversion equation from the standardized value (mmol/mol) to the routinely used value (%). Ann Clin Biochem. 56:204–9. DOI: 10.1177/0004563218808325. PMID: 30282464.
7. Testa R, Guerra E, Bonfigli AR, Di Gaetano N, Santini G, Ceriotti F. 2016; Analytical performances of an enzymatic assay for the measurement of glycated albumin. J Appl Lab Med. 1:162–71. DOI: 10.1373/jalm.2016.020446.
8. Kohzuma T, Koga M. 2010; Lucica GA-L glycated albumin assay kit: a new diagnostic test for diabetes mellitus. Mol Diagn Ther. 14:49–51. DOI: 10.1007/BF03256353. PMID: 20121290.
9. Kohzuma T, Yamamoto T, Uematsu Y, Shihabi ZK, Freedman BI. 2011; Basic performance of an enzymatic method for glycated albumin and reference range determination. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 5:1455–62. DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500619. PMID: 22226265. PMCID: PMC3262714.
10. Paroni R, Ceriotti F, Galanello R, Battista Leoni G, Panico A, Scurati E, et al. 2007; Performance characteristics and clinical utility of an enzymatic method for the measurement of glycated albumin in plasma. Clin Biochem. 40:1398–405. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.08.001. PMID: 17919531.
11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2014. Evaluation of precision of quantitative measurement procedures; Approved guideline-Third edition. EP05-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;Wayne, PA:
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2003. Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures; a statistical approach; Approved guideline. EP06-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;Wayne, PA:
13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2013. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; Approved guideline-Third edition. CLSI document EP09-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;Wayne, PA:
14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2010. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; Approved guideline-Third edition. EP28-A3C. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;Wayne, PA:
15. Reed AH, Henry RJ, Mason WB. 1971; Influence of statistical method used on the resulting estimate of normal range. Clin Chem. 17:275–84. DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/17.4.275. PMID: 5552364.
16. Danese E, Montagnana M, Nouvenne A, Lippi G. 2015; Advantages and pitfalls of fructosamine and glycated albumin in the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 9:169–76. DOI: 10.1177/1932296814567227. PMID: 25591856. PMCID: PMC4604592.
17. Huh JH, Kim KJ, Lee BW, Kim DW, Kang ES, Cha BS, et al. 2014; The relationship between BMI and glycated albumin to glycated hemoglobin (GA/A1c) ratio according to glucose tolerance status. PLoS One. 9:e89478. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089478. PMID: 24586809. PMCID: PMC3938490.
18. Koga M, Otsuki M, Matsumoto S, Saito H, Mukai M, Kasayama S. 2007; Negative association of obesity and its related chronic inflammation with serum glycated albumin but not glycated hemoglobin levels. Clin Chim Acta. 378:48–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.10.013. PMID: 17141207.
19. Westgard QC. Desirable Biological Variation Database specifications. https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm. Last updated in 2014.
20. Furusyo N, Koga T, Ai M, Otokozawa S, Kohzuma T, Ikezaki H, et al. 2011; Utility of glycated albumin for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in a Japanese population study: results from the Kyushu and Okinawa Population Study (KOPS). Diabetologia. 54:3028–36. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-011-2310-6. PMID: 21947435.
Full Text Links
  • LMO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr