J Korean Foot Ankle Soc.  2021 Dec;25(4):165-170. 10.14193/jkfas.2021.25.4.165.

Treatment of Freiberg’s Disease Using the Shortening Effect of the Modified Weil Osteotomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pohang St. Mary’s Hospital, Pohang, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
This study sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the shortening effect of the modified Weil osteotomy for the treatment of Freiberg’s disease.
Materials and Methods
We reviewed 21 cases treated with the modified Weil osteotomy for Freiberg’s disease from November 2005 to June 2019. The average follow-up period was 32.5 months and the mean age of the patients was 38.3 years. The clinical results were analyzed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS), and the range of motion (ROM) of the metatarsophalangeal joint. In the radiologic evaluation, the length of preoperative and postoperative metatarsal shortening was compared.
Results
The average AOFAS lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale showed an improvement from 60.5 preoperatively to 90.9 at the latest follow-up. VAS showed a decrease from 5.4 preoperatively to 0.9 at the latest follow-up. ROM of the affected metatarsophalangeal joint increased from 40.2 degrees preoperatively to 58.6 degrees at the latest follow-up. The mean length of metatarsal shortening was 6.7 mm. There was no transfer metatarsalgia, osteonecrosis, and definite joint space narrowing.
Conclusion
Modified Weil osteotomy with second layer cutting is an effective treatment option to restore the joint surface and painless joint motion for patients with Freiberg’s disease.

Keyword

Freiberg’s disease; Modified Weil osteotomy; Shortening

Figure

  • Figure. 1 (A, B) T2-weighted magnetic resonance images show a high signal intensity lesion at the distal articular surface of the dorsum of the second metatarsal head with subchondral collapse.

  • Figure. 2 (A) Longitudinal skin incision was made through adjacent metatarsal, and the joint was exposed between extensor digitorum longus tendon and extensor digitorum brevis tendon. (B) After wedge osteotomy, the lesion was completely removed. (C) This photography shows the resected dorsal lesion.

  • Figure. 3 (A) The 1st osteotomy was made at the lower margin of the lesion, through the head to the neck of metatarsal bone nearly horizontal to the plantar surface. (B) At the upper margin of the dorsal lesion, the second osteotomy was made and the wedge shape lesion (shaded area) was removed (curved arrow). Also, the unconstrained distal fragment was moved to the proximally (straight arrow). (C) The unconstrained head fragment was migrated to the proximal until the soft tissue tension was relaxed enough, and the overlapping area (shaded area) was resected at the level of proximally migrated cutting margin of the articular surface (curved arrow). (D) After resecting the overlapping area, the head fragment was moved to proximal and downward. To elevate the head and to obtain wide and stable osteotomy surface, the second layer cutting was done. (E) Using twist off screw, two osteotomized fragments were fixed securely. The shortened metatarsal bone and elevated metatarsal head was seen.

  • Figure. 4 (A, B) Six months later after Weil osteotomy, congruent joint and well-shaped metatarsal head was seen.

  • Figure. 5 Schematic drawing shows the metatarsal head center after osteotomy is located on above or at the level of intrinsic muscle by second layer cutting.


Reference

1. Carmont MR, Rees RJ, Blundell CM. 2009; Current concepts review: Freiberg's disease. Foot Ankle Int. 30:167–76. doi: 10.3113/FAI-2009-0167. DOI: 10.3113/FAI-2009-0167. PMID: 19254514.
Article
2. Wiley JJ, Thurston P. 1981; Freiberg's disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 63:459. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198163030-00022.
3. Stanley D, Betts RP, Rowley DI, Smith TW. 1990; Assessment of etiologic factors in the development of Freiberg's disease. J Foot Surg. 29:444–7. PMID: 2258564.
4. Jacob HAC, Zollinger H, Georgiev S. 1986. Could Koehler-Freiberg's disease be caused by biomechanical factors? Paper presented at: Fifth Meeting of the European Society of Biomechanics. Berlin, Germany. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3355-2_76. 1986 Sep 8-10; p. 537–42.
5. Jacob HA, Zollinger H. 1992; [Biomechanics of the foot--forces in the forefoot during walking and their clinical relevance]. Orthopade. 21:75–80. German. PMID: 1549342.
6. Freiberg AA, Freiberg RA. 1995; Core decompression as a novel treatment for early Freiberg's infraction of the second metatarsal head. Orthopedics. 18:1177–8. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19951201-11. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19951201-11. PMID: 8749298.
Article
7. Freiberg JA. 1957; The diagnosis and treatment of common painful conditions of the foot. Instr Course Lect. 14:238–47. PMID: 13524958.
8. Smillie IS. 1957; Freiberg's infraction (Köhler's second disease). J Bone Joint Surg Br. 39:580. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.39B3.579. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.39B3.579.
9. Smith TW, Stanley D, Rowley DI. 1991; Treatment of Freiberg's disease. A new operative technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 73:129–30. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B1.1991746. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B1.1991746. PMID: 1991746.
Article
10. Kinnard P, Lirette R. 1991; Freiberg's disease and dorsiflexion osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 73:864–5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894683. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B5.1894683. PMID: 1894683.
Article
11. Chao KH, Lee CH, Lin LC. 1999; Surgery for symptomatic Freiberg's disease: extraarticular dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy in 13 patients followed for 2-4 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 70:483–6. doi: 10.3109/17453679909000985. DOI: 10.3109/17453679909000985. PMID: 10622482.
Article
12. Lee SK, Chung MS, Baek GH, Oh JH, Lee YH, Gong HS. 2007; Treatment of Freiberg disease with intra-articular dorsal wedge osteotomy and absorbable pin fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 28:43–8. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0008. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0008. PMID: 17257537.
Article
13. Lui TH. 2007; Arthroscopic interpositional arthroplasty for Freiberg's disease. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 15:555–9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0189-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0189-4. PMID: 16909297.
Article
14. McGlamry ED, Ruch JA. 1976; Status of implant arthroplasty of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 66:155–64. doi: 10.7547/87507315-66-3-155. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-66-3-155. PMID: 1254894.
Article
15. Cerrato RA. 2011; Freiberg's disease. Foot Ankle Clin. 16:647–58. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2011.08.008. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2011.08.008. PMID: 22118235.
Article
16. Seybold JD, Zide JR. 2018; Treatment of Freiberg disease. Foot Ankle Clin. 23:157–69. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2017.09.011. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2017.09.011. PMID: 29362030.
Article
17. Smillie IS. 1967; Treatment of Freiberg's infraction. Proc R Soc Med. 60:29–31. doi: 10.1177/003591576706000117. DOI: 10.1177/003591576706000117.
Article
18. Gauthier G, Elbaz R. Freiberg's infraction: a subchondral bone fatigue fracture. A new surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (142):93–5. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197907000-00015. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197907000-00015. PMID: 498654.
19. Kinnard P, Lirette R. 1989; Dorsiflexion osteotomy in Freiberg's disease. Foot Ankle. 9:226–31. doi: 10.1177/107110078900900504. DOI: 10.1177/107110078900900504. PMID: 2731834.
Article
20. Kim J, Choi WJ, Park YJ, Lee JW. 2012; Modified Weil osteotomy for the treatment of Freiberg's disease. Clin Orthop Surg. 4:300–6. doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.4.300. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.4.300. PMID: 23205240. PMCID: PMC3504695.
Article
21. Capar B, Kutluay E, Müjde S. 2007; [Dorsal closing-wedge osteotomy in the treatment of Freiberg's disease]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 41:136–9. Turkish. PMID: 17483650.
22. Lee HS, Kwon SY, Kim DW, Chung JW. 2011; Weil osteotomy for Freiberg's disease. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 15:217–22.
23. Lee JY, Kim WH, Jung S, Yang SH. 2016; Outcome of extraarticular dorsal closing wedge osteotomy for Freiberg's disease. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 20:126–30. doi: 10.14193/jkfas.2016.20.3.126. DOI: 10.14193/jkfas.2016.20.3.126.
Article
24. Barouk LS. 2005. Forefoot reconstruction. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag France;Paris: p. 129–38. DOI: 10.1007/2-287-28937-2. PMID: 15831263.
Full Text Links
  • JKFAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr