Korean Circ J.  2021 May;51(5):469-470. 10.4070/kcj.2021.0069.

Meaning of Ventricular Arrhythmia Burden Reduction as a Marker of Ablation Success

• Yoon N

• KMID: 2515774
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0069

Reference

1. Bennett R, Turnbull S, Kotake Y, Campbell T, Kumar S. Ventricular arrhythmia burden as a marker of success following catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with structural heart disease. Korean Circ J. 2021; 51:455–468.

2. Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17:e2–e154. PMID: 31085023.

3. de Riva M, Piers SR, Kapel GF, et al. Reassessing noninducibility as ablation endpoint of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia: the impact of left ventricular function. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8:853–862. PMID: 25969540.

4. Marchlinski FE, Haffajee CI, Beshai JF, et al. Long-term success of irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation of sustained ventricular tachycardia: post-approval THERMOCOOL VT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67:674–683. PMID: 26868693.

5. Souissi Z, Boulé S, Hermida JS, et al. Catheter ablation reduces ventricular tachycardia burden in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: insights from a north-western French multicentre registry. Europace. 2018; 20:362–369. PMID: 28017936.

6. Stevenson WG, Wilber DJ, Natale A, et al. Irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: the multicenter thermocool ventricular tachycardia ablation trial. Circulation. 2008; 118:2773–2782. PMID: 19064682.