J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2020 Dec;46(6):435-439. 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.435.

Extraction socket preservation

Affiliations
  • 1Editor-in-Chief of J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 3Department of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Section Editor of J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, Seoul, Korea
  • 5Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Armed Forces Medical Command, Seongnam, Korea

Abstract

Extraction socket preservation (ESP) is widely performed after tooth extraction for future implant placement. For successful outcome of implants after extractions, clinicians should be acquainted with the principles and indications of ESP. It is recommended that ESP be actively implemented in cases of esthetic areas, severe bone defects, and delayed implant placement. Dental implant placement is recommended at least 4 months after ESP.

Keyword

Dental implant; Tooth extraction; Socket graft

Reference

References

1. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. 2003; Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 23:313–23. PMID: 12956475.
2. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. 1967; Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 17:21–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7 . DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7. PMID: 5224784.
Article
3. Slot DE. Van der Weijden F. Dell’Acqua F. 2009; Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 36:1048–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x . DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x. PMID: 19929956.
Article
4. Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE, Sanz M, Chen S, Martin WC, et al. Jackowski J; this multicenter study group. 2012; Submerged and transmucosal healing yield the same clinical outcomes with two-piece implants in the anterior maxilla and mandible: interim 1-year results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 23:211–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02210.x . DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02210.x. PMID: 21722188.
Article
5. Darby I, Chen S, De Poi R. 2008; Ridge preservation: what is it and when should it be considered. Aust Dent J. 53:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00008.x . DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00008.x. PMID: 18304236.
Article
6. Castellon P, Yukna RA. 2004; Immediate dental implant placement in sockets augmented with HTR synthetic bone. Implant Dent. 13:42–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000116451.04676.7b . DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000116451.04676.7b. PMID: 15017303.
Article
7. Meltzer AM. 1995; Non-resorbable-membrane-assisted bone regeneration: microscrews, microplates, and reinforcement--part II. Dent Implantol Update. 6:53–6. PMID: 9525149.
8. Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N. 2015; Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: group 4: therapeutic concepts & methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. 26 Suppl 11:180–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12639 .
Article
9. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. 2014; Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 93:950–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514541127 . DOI: 10.1177/0022034514541127. PMID: 24966231. PMCID: PMC4293706.
Article
10. Cha JK, Song YW, Park SH, Jung RE, Jung UW, Thoma DS. 2019; Alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior maxilla reduces vertical dimensional change: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 30:515–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13436 . DOI: 10.1111/clr.13436. PMID: 30980771.
Article
11. Tomasi C, Donati M, Cecchinato D, Szathvary I, Corrà E, Lindhe J. 2018; Effect of socket grafting with deproteinized bone mineral: an RCT on dimensional alterations after 6 months. Clin Oral Implants Res. 29:435–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13141 . DOI: 10.1111/clr.13141. PMID: 29532525.
Article
12. Mahesh L, Venkataraman N, Shukla S, Prasad H, Kotsakis GA. 2015; Alveolar ridge preservation with the socket-plug technique utilizing an alloplastic putty bone substitute or a particulate xenograft: a histological pilot study. J Oral Implantol. 41:178–83. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00025 . DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00025. PMID: 23772806.
Article
13. Ku JK, Hong I, Lee BK, Yun PY, Lee JK. 2019; Dental alloplastic bone substitutes currently available in Korea. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 45:51–67. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.2.51 . DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.2.51. PMID: 31106133. PMCID: PMC6502751.
Article
14. Kivovics M, Szabó BT, Németh O, Tari N, Dőri F, Nagy P, et al. 2017; Microarchitectural study of the augmented bone following ridge preservation with a porcine xenograft and a collagen membrane: preliminary report of a prospective clinical, histological, and micro-computed tomography analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 46:250–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.010 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.010. PMID: 27839628.
Article
15. Horváth A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N. 2013; Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 17:341–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5 . DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5. PMID: 22814758.
Article
16. Simon BI, Von Hagen S, Deasy MJ, Faldu M, Resnansky D. 2000; Changes in alveolar bone height and width following ridge augmentation using bone graft and membranes. J Periodontol. 71:1774–91. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1774 . DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.11.1774. PMID: 11128929.
Article
17. Peñarrocha M, García-Mira B, Martinez O. 2005; Localized vertical maxillary ridge preservation using bone cores and a rotated palatal flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 20:131–4. PMID: 15747685.
18. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. 2000; Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. J Periodontol. 71:1015–23. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.1015 . DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.6.1015. PMID: 10914806.
Article
19. Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. 2001; Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets: 2. histochemical observations at 9 months. J Periodontol. 72:152–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.152 . DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.152. PMID: 11288787.
Article
20. Lee JS, Cha JK, Kim CS. 2018; Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 20:729–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12628 . DOI: 10.1111/cid.12628. PMID: 30051954. PMCID: PMC6220803.
Article
21. Ashman A, Lopinto J. 2000; Placement of implants into ridges grafted with bioplant HTR synthetic bone: histological long-term case history reports. J Oral Implantol. 26:276–90. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0276:POIIRG>2.3.CO;2 . DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0276:POIIRG>2.3.CO;2. PMID: 11831234.
Article
22. Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Herten M, Engelhardt E, Donath K, Kuehn P, et al. 2008; Dimensional ridge alterations following socket preservation using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 37:741–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.017 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.017. PMID: 18554868.
Article
23. Patel K, Mardas N, Donos N. 2013; Radiographic and clinical outcomes of implants placed in ridge preserved sites: a 12-month post-loading follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 24:599–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02500.x . DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02500.x. PMID: 22672611.
Article
24. Boix D, Weiss P, Gauthier O, Guicheux J, Bouler JM, Pilet P, et al. 2006; Injectable bone substitute to preserve alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: a study in dog. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 17:1145–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0542-7 . DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0542-7. PMID: 17122930. PMCID: PMC2042990.
Article
25. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, et al. 2000; Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 90:581–6. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.110035 . DOI: 10.1067/moe.2000.110035. PMID: 11077380.
Article
26. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. 2003; Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 74:990–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990 . DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990. PMID: 12931761.
Article
27. Vance GS, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Johnston H, Scheetz JP. 2004; Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: a clinical and histologic study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 19:491–7. PMID: 15346745.
28. Huh JB, Lee HJ, Jang JW, Kim MJ, Yun PY, Kim SH, et al. 2011; Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of Escherichia coli-derived rhBMP-2 with β-TCP/HA in extraction socket. J Adv Prosthodont. 3:161–5. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.3.161 . DOI: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.3.161. PMID: 22053248. PMCID: PMC3204453.
Article
29. Shi B, Zhou Y, Wang YN, Cheng XR. 2007; Alveolar ridge preservation prior to implant placement with surgical-grade calcium sulfate and platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study in a canine model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 22:656–65. PMID: 17929529.
30. Kim YS, Kwon KH, Cha SY, Min SK. 2005; Effect of gelatin spongy and platelet rich plasma on ridge preservation and bone formation after extraction. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 27:238–47.
31. Ustaoğlu G, Göller Bulut D, Gümüş KÇ. 2020; Evaluation of different platelet-rich concentrates effects on early soft tissue healing and socket preservation after tooth extraction. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 121:539–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2019.09.005 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.09.005. PMID: 31526905.
Article
32. Areewong K, Chantaramungkorn M, Khongkhunthian P. 2019; Platelet-rich fibrin to preserve alveolar bone sockets following tooth extraction: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 21:1156–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12846 . DOI: 10.1111/cid.12846. PMID: 31647177.
Article
33. Ahmed N, Gopalakrishna V, Shetty A, Nagraj V, Imran M, Kumar P. 2019; Efficacy of PRF vs PRF + biodegradable collagen plug in post-extraction preservation of socket. J Contemp Dent Pract. 20:1323–8. PMID: 31892686.
34. Canellas JVDS, da Costa RC, Breves RC, de Oliveira GP, Figueredo CMDS, Fischer RG, et al. 2020; Tomographic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket healing after tooth extraction using leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 48:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.11.006 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.11.006. PMID: 31810848.
Article
35. Neiva RF, Tsao YP, Eber R, Shotwell J, Billy E, Wang HL. 2008; Effects of a putty-form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 on alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontol. 79:291–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070038 . DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070038. PMID: 18251643.
Article
36. Keith JD Jr, Salama MA. 2007; Ridge preservation and augmentation using regenerative materials to enhance implant predictability and esthetics. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 28:614–21. quiz 622–4. PMID: 18064786.
37. Landsberg CJ. 2008; Implementing socket seal surgery as a socket preservation technique for pontic site development: surgical steps revisited--a report of two cases. J Periodontol. 79:945–54. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070298 . DOI: 10.1902/jop.2008.070298. PMID: 18454676.
Article
38. Misch CE, Dietsh-Misch F, Misch CM. 1999; A modified socket seal surgery with composite graft approach. J Oral Implantol. 25:244–50. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(1999)025<0244:AMSSSW>2.3.CO;2 . DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(1999)025<0244:AMSSSW>2.3.CO;2. PMID: 10823026.
Article
39. Karaca Ç, Er N, Gülşahı A, Köseoğlu OT. 2015; Alveolar ridge preservation with a free gingival graft in the anterior maxilla: volumetric evaluation in a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 44:774–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.01.015 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.01.015. PMID: 25682463.
Article
40. Tal H. 1999; Autogenous masticatory mucosal grafts in extraction socket seal procedures: a comparison between sockets grafted with demineralized freeze-dried bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res. 10:289–96. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100405.x . DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100405.x. PMID: 10551071.
Article
41. Luczyszyn SM, Papalexiou V, Novaes AB Jr, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba M Jr. 2005; Acellular dermal matrix and hydroxyapatite in prevention of ridge deformities after tooth extraction. Implant Dent. 14:176–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000165082.77499.41 . DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000165082.77499.41. PMID: 15968190.
Article
42. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, et al. 1998; Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol. 69:1044–9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1044 . DOI: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1044. PMID: 9776033.
Article
43. Nunes FAS, Pignaton TB, Novaes AB Jr, Taba M Jr, Messora MR, Palioto DB, et al. 2018; Evaluation of a bone substitute covered with a collagen membrane for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clinical and tomographic randomized controlled study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 29:424–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13140 . DOI: 10.1111/clr.13140. PMID: 29569754.
Article
44. Kim DM, De Angelis N, Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Nevins M. 2013; Ridge preservation with and without primary wound closure: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 33:71–8. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1463 . DOI: 10.11607/prd.1463. PMID: 23342349.
Article
45. Oh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. 2003; Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 14:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x . DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x. PMID: 12562369.
Article
46. Serino G, Biancu S, Iezzi G, Piattelli A. 2003; Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler: a clinical and histological study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 14:651–8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.x . DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.x. PMID: 12969370.
Article
47. Jung RE, Sapata VM, Hämmerle CHF, Wu H, Hu XL, Lin Y. 2018; Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 29:522–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13149 . DOI: 10.1111/clr.13149. PMID: 29607553.
Article
48. Pedroso Bergamo ET, Bordin D, Arbex L, Konrad D, Gil LF, et al. Faciola Pessôa de Oliveira PG. 2019; Ridge architecture preservation following minimally traumatic exodontia techniques and guided tissue regeneration. Implant Dent. 28:319–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000886 . DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000886. PMID: 31008823.
Article
49. Kim YK, Yun PY, Lee HJ, Ahn JY, Kim SG. 2011; Ridge preservation of the molar extraction socket using collagen sponge and xenogeneic bone grafts. Implant Dent. 20:267–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182166afc . DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182166afc. PMID: 21753734.
Article
50. Kim JW, Jeon HR, Hong JR. 2006; The study on ridge preservation for implant site development. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 32:430–5.
51. Koo TH, Song YW, Cha JK, Jung UW, Kim CS, Lee JS. 2020; Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 31:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13557 . DOI: 10.1111/clr.13557. PMID: 31724239.
Article
52. Koo TH, Choe SH, Kim S, Kim CS, Lee JS. 2019; Histologic biopsy results from extraction socket grafting by deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral in damaged extraction sockets‐ randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implant Res. 30:33–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.55_13508 .
Article
53. Im SU, Hong JY, Chae GJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Lee YK, et al. 2008; The evaluation of healing patterns in surgically created circumferential gap defects around dental implants according to implant surface, defect width and defect morphology. J Korean Acad Periodontol. 38:385–94.
Article
54. Wang HL, Kiyonobu K, Neiva RF. 2004; Socket augmentation: rationale and technique. Implant Dent. 13:286–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000148559.57890.86 . DOI: 10.1097/01.id.0000148559.57890.86. PMID: 15591989.
Article
55. Heberer S, Al-Chawaf B, Jablonski C, Nelson JJ, Lage H, Nelson K. 2011; Healing of ungrafted and grafted extraction sockets after 12 weeks: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 26:385–92. PMID: 21483892.
56. Haghighat A, Hekmatian E, Abdinian M, Sadeghkhani E. 2011; Radiographic evaluation of bone formation and density changes after mandibular third molar extraction: a 6 month follow up. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 8:1–5. PMID: 22132008. PMCID: PMC3177375.
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr