J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2020 Dec;46(6):379-384. 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.379.

Diagnostic analysis of vertical orbital dystopia and canthal tilt for surgical correction

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
We sought to identify a clinically useful method of analyzing orbital dystopia to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning and to quantify vertical discrepancies in eye level and variations in canthal tilt in Koreans.
Patients and Methods
In 76 Korean patients with a mean age of 23.12 years, mean differences in the level of the pupils, lateral canthi, medial canthi, and canthal tilt were measured. The difference in pupil level was calculated from the perpendicular lines drawn from the midpupil area of each eye to the midline of the face to determine the amount of skeletal discrepancy of the eye. Soft tissue discrepancies were determined according to the vertical difference between the lines drawn from the lateral or medial canthus of each eye perpendicular to the midline of the face. The canthal tilt was determined from the inclination of a line connecting the lateral and medial canthi, then classified as class I, II, or III.
Results
Mean differences in pupil level, medial canthi, and lateral canthi were 1.57±1.10 mm, 1.14±1.07 mm, and 2.03±1.64 mm, respectively. The mean degree of canthal tilt were 8.45°±3.53° for the right side and 8.42°±3.81° for the left side. No study participants presented with class III canthal tilt. The mean canthal tilt values for those with class I tilt were 3.21°±1.68° for the right side and 3.18°±1.63° for the left side, while, for those who had class II tilt, the values were 9.60°±3.66° for the right side and 9.54°±2.99° for the left side.
Conclusion
The presented diagnostic method of orbital dystopia can be used to effectively establish a treatment plan that takes into consideration the patient’s skeletal and soft-tissue discrepancies.

Keyword

Orbit; Facial asymmetry; Anthropometry

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Analysis of skeletal vertical discrepancy using the differences in the levels of orbits. A horizontal line (white line) from midpupil perpendicular to the midline of the face (black line) was drawn, and the differences between the horizontal lines from each side of the eyes were calculated.

  • Fig. 2 Analysis of soft tissue discrepancy using the differences in the levels of medial canthi. A horizontal line (white line) from medial canthus perpendicular to the midline of the face (black line) was drawn, and the differences between the horizontal lines from each side of the eyes were calculated.

  • Fig. 3 Analysis of soft tissue discrepancy using the differences in the levels of lateral canthi. A horizontal line (white line) from lateral canthus perpendicular to the midline of the face (black line) was drawn, and the differences between the horizontal lines from each side of the eyes were calculated.

  • Fig. 4 Measurement of canthal tilt using an angle formed by a line connecting the medial canthus and lateral canthus (red line) and a perpendicular line (white line) connecting the medial canthus and the midline of the face (black line).

  • Fig. 5 Classification of canthal tilt. Criteria for classifying the various canthal tilts was applied. Class I, canthal tilt between 0° and 5°; Class II, canthal tilt over 5°; Class III, canthal tilt less than 0°.


Reference

References

1. Choi KY. 2015; Analysis of facial asymmetry. Arch Craniofac Surg. 16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2015.16.1.1 . DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2015.16.1.1. PMID: 28913211. PMCID: PMC5556787.
Article
2. Song WC, Koh KS, Kim SH, Hu KS, Kim HJ, Park JC, et al. 2007; Horizontal angular asymmetry of the face in Korean young adults with reference to the eye and mouth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 65:2164–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.018 . DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.018. PMID: 17954309.
Article
3. Hwang HS, Youn IS, Lee KH, Lim HJ. 2007; Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 132:279.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.017 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.017. PMID: 17826592.
Article
4. Altug-Atac AT, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. 2008; Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 121:1751–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816aa003 . DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816aa003. PMID: 18454000.
Article
5. Yamashita Y, Nakamura Y, Shimada T, Nomura Y, Hirashita A. 2009; Asymmetry of the lips of orthognathic surgery patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 136:559–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.057 . DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.057. PMID: 19815159.
Article
6. Yu CC, Bergeron L, Lin CH, Chu YM, Chen YR. 2009; Single-splint technique in orthognathic surgery: intraoperative checkpoints to control facial symmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 124:879–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03842 . DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03842. PMID: 19730307.
Article
7. Edgerton MT, Jane JA. 1981; Vertical orbital dystopia--surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 67:121–38. PMID: 7465660.
Article
8. Tan ST, Mulliken JB. 1997; Hypertelorism: nosologic analysis of 90 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 99:317–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199702000-00004 . DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199702000-00004. PMID: 9030136.
Article
9. Shakir S, Hoppe IC, Taylor JA. 2019; State-of-the-art hypertelorism management. Clin Plast Surg. 46:185–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2018.11.004 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.11.004. PMID: 30851750.
Article
10. Laure B, Batut C, Benouhagrem A, Joly A, Travers N, Listrat A, et al. 2019; Addressing hypertelorism: indications and techniques. Neurochirurgie. 65:286–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.09.007 . DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.09.007. PMID: 31557491.
Article
11. Batut C, Joly A, Travers N, Guichard B, Paré A, Laure B. 2019; Surgical treatment of orbital hypertelorism: historical evolution and development prospects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 47:1712–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.002 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.002. PMID: 31519384.
Article
12. Winters R. 2016; Tessier clefts and hypertelorism. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 24:545–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2016.06.013 . DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.06.013. PMID: 27712820.
Article
13. Engel M, Hoffmann J, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Freudlsperger C. 2015; The value of three-dimensional printing modelling for surgical correction of orbital hypertelorism. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 19:91–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-014-0466-1 . DOI: 10.1007/s10006-014-0466-1. PMID: 25249178.
Article
14. Liu DL, Shan L, Yuan Q, Huang JJ. 2011; Refinement of the correction of orbital hypertelorism. J Craniofac Surg. 22:217–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f7604f . DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f7604f. PMID: 21233750.
Article
15. Tan ST, Ashworth G, Czypionka S, Poole MD, Briggs M. 1996; Vertical orbital dystopia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 97:1349–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199606000-00004 . PMID: 7465660.
Article
16. Poole MD, Briggs M. 1990; The cranio-facio-cervical scoliosis complex. Br J Plast Surg. 43:670–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(90)90187-5 . DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(90)90187-5. PMID: 2257416.
Article
17. Kim EJ, Ki EJ, Cheon HM, Choi EJ, Kwon KH. 2013; 3-Dimensional analysis for class III malocclusion patients with facial asymmetry. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 39:168–74. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.4.168 . DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.4.168. PMID: 24471038. PMCID: PMC3858129.
Article
18. Cook JT. 1980; Asymmetry of the cranio-facial skeleton. Br J Orthod. 7:33–8. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.7.1.33 . DOI: 10.1179/bjo.7.1.33. PMID: 6932963.
Article
19. Moore FO, Thornton BP, Zabel DD, Vasconez HC. 2004; Autogenous orbital reconstruction in a child with congenital abnormalities of the orbital roof and vertical orbital dystopia. J Craniofac Surg. 15:930–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200411000-00008 . DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200411000-00008. PMID: 15547377.
Article
20. Tessier P. Tessier P, Rougier J, Wolfe SA, editors. 1981. Congenital orbital dystopias. Plastic surgery of the orbit and eyelids. Masson Publishing;New York: p. 191–9.
21. De Ponte FS, Fadda T, Rinna C, Brunelli A, Iannetti G. 1997; Early and late surgical treatment of orbital dystopia in craniofacial malformation. J Craniofac Surg. 8:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199701000-00008 . DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199701000-00008. PMID: 10332293.
Article
22. Rhee SC, Woo KS, Kwon B. 2012; Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 36:1236–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9937-7 . DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9937-7. PMID: 22810555.
Article
23. Farkas LG. 1994. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. Raven Press;New York: p. 101–11.
24. Lam BL, Lam S, Walls RC. 1995; Prevalence of palpebral fissure asymmetry in white persons. Am J Ophthalmol. 120:518–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72667-4 . DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72667-4. PMID: 7573311.
Article
25. Doganay F, Dadaci Z, Topcu-Yilmaz P, Doganay Aydin H. 2017; The association between ocular dominance and physiological palpebral fissure asymmetry. Laterality. 22:412–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2016.1209212 . DOI: 10.1080/1357650X.2016.1209212. PMID: 27461553.
Article
26. Song WC, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Hu KS, Kim HJ, Koh KS. 2007; Asymmetry of the palpebral fissure and upper eyelid crease in Koreans. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 60:251–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.04.027 . DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.04.027. PMID: 17293281.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr