Anat Cell Biol.  2020 Dec;53(4):398-404. 10.5115/acb.20.119.

New insights in anterior cruciate ligament morphology: implications for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgeries

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • 2Intern, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

The frequency of injury of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), the importance of anatomy in surgical repair and potential of the injured ACL to predispose to osteoarthritis necessitates the need for understanding its precise anatomy. Available studies have focussed on tunnel positioning and hence attachment site of the ligament. Few studies which have focussed on morphology reflect ambiguities in size, fibre bundle, number and disposition. Since a near anatomical repair of the ACL is the treatment of choice, the present study was planned to describe the morphology of ACL. Twenty-two ACL (11 right and 11 left) isolated from knee joints of collection of adult embalmed lower limbs were utilised for the study. The ACL morphology and morphometry were studied for footprints and fibre bundles. Three distinct bundles of differing lengths constitute a spiral ACL complex. These bundles are positioned as- intermediate with posteromedial and anterolateral flanking in respective positions. The tibial and femoral footprints are paw-shaped and oval respectively. Tibial footprints are approximately 2.5 times larger in area than the femoral footprints. The unique morphology of ACL vis a vis its spiralization, and its mechanical advantage of in terminal extension and conjunct rotation of knee (which are peculiarly human trait) are discussed. It is recommended to utilize the concept of spiralization and differing bundle length in ACL surgeries to achieve the favourable clinical outcome.

Keyword

Anterior cruciate ligament; Mechanics; Knee joint; Knee joint

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Shows the footprints of ACL. (A) Shows the morphology of paw-shaped tibial footprints. (B) Shows oval, elongated and mediolaterally flattened femoral footprints. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament.

  • Fig. 2 (A–C) Shows the three bundles of ACL and their relative positioning. Shows the presence of three distinct fibre bundles and the relative positioning of the different fibre bundles as seen in the (A) right and (B) left ACL. C shows ACL from posterior aspect; three bundles can be seen with fibres of posteromedial bundle spiralling posterior to the intermediate bundle. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; AL, anterolateral bundle; I, intermediate bundle; PM, posteromedial bundle.

  • Fig. 3 Shows the medially spiralized fibre arrangement of the intermediate bundle of the right side. Inf, inferior; Lat, lateral; Med, medial; Sup, superior.

  • Fig. 4 Shows the schematic diagram of ACL as visualized from the superior aspect to see the femoral footprints. The different arrangements of fibre bundles based on their relative position in ACL femoral footprints are seen. A, anterior; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; AL, anterolateral bundle; I, intermediate bundle; L, lateral; M, medial; P, posterior; PM, posteromedial bundle.

  • Fig. 5 Showing fanning fibres of AL crossing over from lateral to medial side of the I on the right side. Posteromedial bundle of this ACL was very small and not seen in this view. AL, anterolateral bundle; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; I, intermediate bundle; Inf, inferior; Med, medial; Lat, lateral; Sup, superior.


Cited by  1 articles

Quantification and comparison of tenocyte distribution and collagen content in the commonly used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Sabiha Latiff, Oladiran Ibukunolu Olateju
Anat Cell Biol. 2022;55(3):304-310.    doi: 10.5115/acb.22.005.


Reference

References

1. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A. 1975; The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (106):216–31. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197501000-00033. PMID: 1126079.
2. Gray H, Standring S, Ellis H, Berkovitz BKB. 2005. Gray's anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone;New York: p. 1474.
3. Collins SL, Layde P, Guse CE, Schlotthauer AE, Van Valin SE. 2014; The incidence and etiology of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in patients under the age of 18 in the state of Wisconsin. Pediat Therapeut. 4:196.
Article
4. Sonnery-Cottet B, Chambat P. 2006; Anatomic double bundle: a new concept in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon. Arthroscopy. 22:1249.e1–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.042. PMID: 17084307.
Article
5. Kopf S, Pombo MW, Irrgang JJ, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH. 2012; Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites. Arthroscopy. 28(Suppl):e400–1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.05.597. PMID: 20847222.
Article
6. Ferretti M, Alves MTS, Marcondes FB, Amaro JS, Fu FH, Cohen M. 2012; Anatomical and histological study of the anterior cruciate ligament: is there an intermediate bundle? Arthroscopy. 28(Suppl):e401–2. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.05.598.
7. Ferretti M, Doca D, Ingham SM, Cohen M, Fu FH. 2012; Bony and soft tissue landmarks of the ACL tibial insertion site: an anatomical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 20:62–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1592-z. PMID: 21710110.
Article
8. Gil YC, Park JA, Yang HJ, Lee HY. 2008; Anatomy of the femoral attachment site of the anterior cruciate ligament and the posterolateral structures related to the stability of the knee joint. Anat Cell Biol. 41:57–65.
9. Tan JL, Chang PC, Mitra AK, Tay BK. 1998; Anthropometry of anterior cruciate ligament in Singaporean Chinese. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 27:776–9. PMID: 10101548.
10. Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Łysoń B, Siebold R. 2015; Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 23:3143–50. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3146-7. PMID: 24972997. PMCID: PMC4611008.
Article
11. Oka S, Schuhmacher P, Brehmer A, Traut U, Kirsch J, Siebold R. 2016; Histological analysis of the tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 24:747–53. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3924-x. PMID: 26685684.
Article
12. Petersen W, Tillmann B. 2002; [Anatomy and function of the anterior cruciate ligament]. Orthopade. 31:710–8. German. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-002-0330-0. PMID: 12426749.
13. Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. 2008; Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement--a cadaver study. Arthroscopy. 24:585–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.12.008. PMID: 18442692.
Article
14. Harvey A, Thomas NP, Amis AA. 2005; Fixation of the graft in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87:593–603. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15803. PMID: 15855357.
Article
15. Siebold R, Schuhmacher P, Fernandez F, Śmigielski R, Fink C, Brehmer A, Kirsch J. 2015; Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial "C"-shaped insertion site. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 23:3136–42. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3058-6. PMID: 24841941. PMCID: PMC4611027.
Article
16. Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Williams A. 2016. The anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relevance to the technique of reconstruction. Bone Joint J. 98-B:1020–6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37117. PMID: 27482012.
Article
17. Proffen BL, McElfresh M, Fleming BC, Murray MM. 2012; A comparative anatomical study of the human knee and six animal species. Knee. 19:493–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.005. PMID: 21852139. PMCID: PMC3236814.
Article
18. Murray PJ, Alexander JW, Gold JE, Icenogle KD, Noble PC, Lowe WR. 2010; Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: kinematics and knee flexion angle-graft tension relation. Arthroscopy. 26:202–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.014. PMID: 20141983.
Article
19. Smith PA, Bley JA. 2017; Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair with independent tensioning of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. Arthrosc Tech. 6:e2123–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.022. PMID: 29349007. PMCID: PMC5766347.
Article
20. Tanabe Y, Yasuda K, Kondo E, Kawaguchi Y, Akita K, Yagi T. 2019; Comparison of graft length changes during knee motion among 5 different anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction approaches: a biomechanical study. Orthop J Sports Med. 7:2325967119834933. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119834933. PMID: 30937322. PMCID: PMC6435881.
Article
21. van der List JP, Mintz DN, DiFelice GS. 2017; The location of anterior cruciate ligament tears: a prevalence study using magnetic resonance imaging. Orthop J Sports Med. 5:2325967117709966. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117709966. PMID: 28680889. PMCID: PMC5484434.
Article
22. Park HS, Ahn C, Fung DT, Ren Y, Zhang LQ. 2010; A knee-specific finite element analysis of the human anterior cruciate ligament impingement against the femoral intercondylar notch. J Biomech. 43:2039–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.015. PMID: 20413123. PMCID: PMC2900495.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACB
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr