J Cardiovasc Imaging.  2019 Jul;27(3):212-213. 10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e32.

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Volume: Which method Is Your Choice?

• Lim KH
• Chang SA

• KMID: 2456856
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2019.27.e32

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Methods*

Reference

1. Wood PW, Choy JB, Nanda NC, Becher H. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: it depends on the imaging method. Echocardiography. 2014; 31:87–100.

2. Bellenger NG, Francis JM, Davies CL, Coats AJ, Pennell DJ. Establishment and performance of a magnetic resonance cardiac function clinic. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2000; 2:15–22.

3. Lee SE, Nguyen C, Xie Y, et al. Recent advances in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Korean Circ J. 2019; 49:146–159.

4. Chang SA, Lee SC, Kim EY, et al. Feasibility of single-beat full-volume capture real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and auto-contouring algorithm for quantification of left ventricular volume: validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24:853–859.

5. Pellikka PA, She L, Holly TA, et al. Variability in ejection fraction measured by echocardiography, gated single-photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. JAMA Netw Open. 2018; 1:e181456.

6. Beitner N, Jenner J, Sörensson P. Comparison of left ventricular volumes measured by 3DE, SPECT and CMR. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 27:200–211.

7. Jenner J, Sörensson P, Pernow J, Caidahl K, Eriksson MJ. Contrast enhancement and image quality influence two- and three-dimensional echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2019; 13:1179546819831980.