Korean J Radiol.  2019 Jun;20(6):999-1000. 10.3348/kjr.2019.0044.

Re: Identification of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features Associated with Positive Resection Margins in Breast Cancer?

• Cen D
• Hu W
• Wang X
• Wu X

• KMID: 2447079
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0044

Abstract

No abstract available.

Keyword

Comments; Positive resection margins; Breast cancer

MeSH Terms

Breast Neoplasms*
Breast*
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*

Reference

1. Kang JH, Youk JH, Kim JA, Gweon HM, Eun NL, Ko KH, et al. Identification of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging features associated with positive resection margins in breast cancer: a retrospective study. Korean J Radiol. 2018; 19:897–904.

2. Chi YY, Zhou XH. The need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction: comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by Pencina et al., statistics in medicine (DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929). Stat Med. 2008; 27:182–184.

3. van Smeden M, Moons KG, de Groot JA, Collins GS, Altman DG, Eijkemans MJ, et al. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: beyond events per variable criteria. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008; 01. 01. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1177/0962280218784726.

4. Wynants L, Bouwmeester W, Moons KG, Moerbeek M, Timmerman D, Van Huffel S, et al. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68:1406–1414.

5. Concato J, Peduzzi P, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48:1495–1501.