J Rheum Dis.  2019 Jan;26(1):5-11. 10.4078/jrd.2019.26.1.5.

Normality Test in Clinical Research

• Kwak SG
• Park SH

• KMID: 2442029
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2019.26.1.5

Abstract

In data analysis, given that various statistical methods assume that the distribution of the population data is normal distribution, it is essential to check and test whether or not the data satisfy the normality requirement. Although the analytical methods vary depending on whether or not the normality is satisfied, inconsistent results might be obtained depending on the analysis method used. In many clinical research papers, the results are presented and interpreted without checking or testing normality. According to the central limit theorem, the distribution of the sample mean satisfies the normal distribution when the number of samples is above 30. However, in many clinical studies, due to cost and time restrictions during data collection, the number of samples is frequently lower than 30. In this case, a proper statistical analysis method is required to determine whether or not the normality is satisfied by performing a normality test. In this regard, this paper discusses the normality check, several methods of normality test, and several statistical analysis methods with or without normality checks.

Keyword

Normality check; Normal distribution; Normality test; Statistical analysis method

MeSH Terms

Data Collection
Methods
Normal Distribution
Statistics as Topic

Figure

• 

  Figure 1. Histogram with normal distribution curve.

• 

  Figure 2. Q– Q plot for example data set.

Reference

1. Fagerland MW. t-tests, non-parametric tests, and large studies–a paradox of statistical practice? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:78.

2. Kwak SG, Kim JH. Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017; 70:144–56.

3. Kim TK. T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015; 68:540–6.

4. Chan Y, Walmsley RP. Learning and understanding the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis-of-variance-by-ranks test for differences among three or more independent groups. Phys Ther. 1997; 77:1755–62.

5. Pereira DG, Afonso A, Medeiros FM. Overview of Friedman's test and Post-hoc analysis. Commun Stat – Simul Comput. 2015; 44:2636–53.

6. Schmidt AF, Finan C. Linear regression and the normality assumption. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 98:146–51.