Pediatr Infect Vaccine.  2018 Apr;25(1):17-25. 10.14776/piv.2018.25.1.17.

A Multicenter Survey on the Current Status of Pediatric Blood Cultures in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, the Republic of Korea. chieunoh@kosin.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
Blood culture is an essential diagnostic tool and requires clear indications, proper techniques, and quality control. We aimed to investigate whether blood cultures in children are appropriate for indications, are performed correctly, and receive proper quality control.
METHODS
We conducted an online survey targeting pediatric infectious diseases (ID) specialists working in general hospitals and neonatologists (Neo) working at hospitals operating a neonatal intensive care unit in Korea.
RESULTS
Approximately 81.1% (30/37) of pediatric ID specialists and 72.2% (52/72) of Neo responded to the survey. Some of the respondents (33.3% of ID and 59.6% of Neo) performed blood culture as a regular test irrespective of the indication. Approximately 40% of ID and 65.4% of Neo ordered only one set of blood culture in patients suspected with bacteremia. The most commonly used disinfectant for skin preparation was povidone-iodine, while the skin preparation method varied by institution. Approximately two-thirds of the institutions were monitoring the blood culture contamination rate, whereas relatively few provided staff with feedback on that rate. In addition, less than half of the institutions were providing regular staff training on blood culture (40% of ID and 28.8% of Neo).
CONCLUSIONS
The indication and methods of blood culture for children varied according to institution, and few hospitals exert effort in improving the quality of blood culture. Institutions have to strive constantly toward improvement of blood culture quality and evidence-based recommendations for pediatric blood cultures should be standardized.

Keyword

Blood culture; Infant, newborn; Child; Quality control; Surveys and questionnaires

MeSH Terms

Bacteremia
Child
Communicable Diseases
Hospitals, General
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care, Neonatal
Korea*
Methods
Povidone-Iodine
Quality Control
Skin
Specialization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Povidone-Iodine

Figure

  • Fig. 1. The job roles of the staff that collect blood from patients were compared among different places of work. (A) Staff who performed blood culture in child patients in the pediatric emergency room (ER), the ward, and in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). A total of 30 pediatric infectious disease specialists responded to the survey. (B) Staff who performed blood culture in neonates in the nursery, the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and in the ER. A total of 52 neonatologists responded to the survey.


Reference

References

1. Alahmadi YM, Aldeyab MA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Darwish Elhajji FW, Magee FA, et al. Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting. J Hosp Infect. 2011; 77:233–6.
Article
2. Segal GS, Chamberlain JM. Resource utilization and contaminated blood cultures in children at risk for occult bacteremia. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000; 154:469–73.
Article
3. Gander RM, Byrd L, DeCrescenzo M, Hirany S, Bowen M, Baughman J. Impact of blood cultures drawn by phlebotomy on contamination rates and health care costs in a hospital emergency department. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47:1021–4.
Article
4. Wilson ML. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M47A Principles and procedures for blood cultures: approved guideline. 1st Ed.Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;2007.
5. Shin JH, Song SA, Kim M, Kim S. Nationwide survey of blood culture performance regarding skin disinfection, blood collection and laboratory procedures. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 14:91–6.
Article
6. Snyder SR, Favoretto AM, Baetz RA, Derzon JH, Madison BM, Mass D, et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Biochem. 2012; 45:999–1011.
Article
7. Weinbaum FI, Lavie S, Danek M, Sixsmith D, Heinrich GF, Mills SS. Doing it right the first time: quality improvement and the contaminant blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35:563–5.
Article
8. Kim NH, Kim M, Lee S, Yun NR, Kim KH, Park SW, et al. Effect of routine sterile gloving on contamination rates in blood culture: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154:145–51.
9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. GP41-A6 Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture; approved standard. 6th Ed.Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute;2007.
10. Trautner BW, Clarridge JE, Darouiche RO. Skin antisepsis kits containing alcohol and chlorhexidine gluconate or tincture of iodine are associated with low rates of blood culture contamination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23:397–401.
Article
11. Isaacman DJ, Karasic RB, Reynolds EA, Kost SI. Effect of number of blood cultures and volume of blood on detection of bacteremia in children. J Pediatr. 1996; 128:190–5.
Article
12. Baron EJ, Miller JM, Weinstein MP, Richter SS, Gilligan PH, Thomson RB Jr, et al. A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2013 recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)(a). Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 57:e22–121.
Article
13. Schelonka RL, Chai MK, Yoder BA, Hensley D, Brockett RM, Ascher DP. Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens. J Pediatr. 1996; 129:275–8.
Article
14. Buttery JP. Blood cultures in newborns and children: optimising an everyday test. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002; 87:F25–8.
Article
15. Connell TG, Rele M, Cowley D, Buttery JP, Curtis N. How reliable is a negative blood culture result? Volume of blood submitted for culture in routine practice in a children's hospital. Pediatrics. 2007; 119:891–6.
Article
16. Simonsen KA, Anderson-Berry AL, Delair SF, Davies HD. Early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014; 27:21–47.
Article
17. Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006; 19:788–802.
Article
18. Park WB, Myung SJ, Oh MD, Lee J, Kim NJ, Kim EC, et al. Educational intervention as an effective step for reducing blood culture contamination: a prospective cohort study. J Hosp Infect. 2015; 91:111–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PIV
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr