Ann Rehabil Med.  2018 Aug;42(4):528-535. 10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.528.

Status of Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke: A Korean Nationwide Study

• Kim WS
• Bae HJ
• Lee HH
• Shin HI

• KMID: 2420044
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.528

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To investigate the post-stroke rehabilitation status according to stroke severity using the database of the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.
METHODS
The data of patients admitted to the neurology departments of 12 hospitals within 7 days of onset of ischemic stroke were collected. A total of 2,895 patients hospitalized between November 2010 and December 2011 were included. The patients were classified into three groups according to their initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (mild, ≤5; moderate, >5 and ≤13; and severe, >13). Length of hospital stay (LoS) with rehabilitation, NIHSS score after acute care, and scores on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were examined at 1 year post-stroke according to stroke severity and ongoing rehabilitation.
RESULTS
The total LoS for ongoing rehabilitation significantly increased with stroke severity (mild, 91.66±149.70; moderate, 197.26±241.93; severe, 263.50±275.75 days; p < 0.01). However, the proportion of LoS with ongoing rehabilitation to the total LoS tended to decline with increasing stroke severity (mild, 77.93±29.50, p < 0.01; moderate, 71.83±32.13; severe, 62.29±37.19). The home discharge rate of the group that underwent continuous inpatient rehabilitation was significantly higher in patients with moderate and severe stroke, respectively (14.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001; 7.4% vs. 0.0%, p=0.032).
CONCLUSION
This study showed that intermittent rehabilitation was often provided after acute care, whereas ongoing rehabilitation positively affected rate of home discharge in patients with moderate and severe stroke in Korea. These results represent evidence for improving the healthcare system to promote adequate rehabilitation in the future.

Keyword

Stroke rehabilitation; Patient acuity; Cerebrovascular disorders; Database

MeSH Terms

Cerebrovascular Disorders
Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Inpatients
Insurance, Health
Korea
Length of Stay
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Neurology
Patient Acuity
Rehabilitation*
Stroke*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Flow chart outlining subject recruitment. CVA, cerebrovascular accident.

Reference

1. Langhorne P, Sandercock P, Prasad K. Evidence-based practice for stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8:308–9.

2. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 9:CD000197.

3. Albert SJ, Kesselring J. Neurorehabilitation of stroke. J Neurol. 2012; 259:817–32.

4. Ottenbacher KJ, Jannell S. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol. 1993; 50:37–44.

5. Cifu DX, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(5 Suppl 1):S35–9.

6. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 4:CD000197.

7. Chang WH, Shin YI, Lee SG, Oh GJ, Lim YS, Kim YH. Characteristics of inpatient care and rehabilitation for acute first-ever stroke patients. Yonsei Med J. 2015; 56:262–70.

8. Kang JH, Bae HJ, Choi YA, Lee SH, Shin HI. Length of hospital stay after stroke: a Korean nationwide study. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016; 40:675–81.

9. Granger CV, Markello SJ, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Ottenbacher KJ. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with stroke discharged from comprehensive medical programs in 2000-2007. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 88:961–72.

10. Schlegel D, Kolb SJ, Luciano JM, Tovar JM, Cucchiara BL, Liebeskind DS, et al. Utility of the NIH Stroke Scale as a predictor of hospital disposition. Stroke. 2003; 34:134–7.

11. Bustamante A, Giralt D, Garcıa-Berrocoso T, Rubiera M, Alvarez-Sabin J, Molina C, et al. The impact of post-stroke complications on in-hospital mortality depends on stroke severity. Eur Stroke J. 2017; 2:54–63.

12. Grube MM, Koennecke HC, Walter G, Meisel A, Sobesky J, Nolte CH, et al. Influence of acute complications on outcome 3 months after ischemic stroke. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e75719.

13. Kang EK, Kim WS, Jeong SH, Shin HI, Han TR. Desire for rehabilitation services of stroke patients admitted in post-acute rehabilitation facilities. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2007; 31:404–9.

14. Rah UW, Kim YH, Ohn SH, Chun MH, Kim MW, Yoo WK, et al. Clinical practice guideline for stroke rehabilitation in Korea 2012. Brain Neurorehabil. 2014; 7:S1–S75.

15. Langhorne P, Stott D, Knight A, Bernhardt J, Barer D, Watkins C. Very early rehabilitation or intensive telemetry after stroke: a pilot randomised trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010; 29:352–60.

16. National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guideline for stroke management 2010. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation;2010.

17. Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group. VA/DOD Clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010; 47:1–43.

18. Teasell R, Foley N, Salter K, Bhogal S, Jutai J, Speechley M. Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation: executive summary, 12th edition. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009; 16:463–88.