J Korean Med Sci.  2016 May;31(5):660-673. 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.5.660.

Specialist Bibliographic Databases

Affiliations
  • 1Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK. a.gasparyan@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Biochemistry, Biology and Microbiology, South Kazakhstan State Pharmaceutical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.
  • 3Department of Marketing and Trade Deals, Kuban State University, Krasnodar, Russian Federation.
  • 4Department of Technological Management, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
  • 5Faculty of Accounting and Finance, Department of Accounting Management, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
  • 6Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Stavropol State Agrarian University, Stavropol, Russian Federation.
  • 7Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Abstract

Specialist bibliographic databases offer essential online tools for researchers and authors who work on specific subjects and perform comprehensive and systematic syntheses of evidence. This article presents examples of the established specialist databases, which may be of interest to those engaged in multidisciplinary science communication. Access to most specialist databases is through subscription schemes and membership in professional associations. Several aggregators of information and database vendors, such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest, facilitate advanced searches supported by specialist keyword thesauri. Searches of items through specialist databases are complementary to those through multidisciplinary research platforms, such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Familiarizing with the functional characteristics of biomedical and nonbiomedical bibliographic search tools is mandatory for researchers, authors, editors, and publishers. The database users are offered updates of the indexed journal lists, abstracts, author profiles, and links to other metadata. Editors and publishers may find particularly useful source selection criteria and apply for coverage of their peer-reviewed journals and grey literature sources. These criteria are aimed at accepting relevant sources with established editorial policies and quality controls.

Keyword

Abstracting and Indexing as Topic; Editorial Policies; Periodicals as Topic; Publishing; Information Retrieval; Bibliographic Databases; Systematic Reviews

MeSH Terms

*Databases, Bibliographic
Databases, Factual
Editorial Policies
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Periodicals as Topic
Publishing

Cited by  2 articles

Open Access Publishing in India: Coverage, Relevance, and Future Perspectives
Durga Prasanna Misra, Vikas Agarwal
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(27):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e180.

Critical Thinking and Scientific Writing Skills of Non-Anglophone Medical Students: a Model of Training Course
Edward Barroga, Hiroshi Mitoma
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(3):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e18.


Reference

1. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. Preserving the integrity of citations and references by all stakeholders of science communication. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:1545–1552.
2. Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of systematic review assistant-deduplication module. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:6.
3. Niel G, Boyrie F, Virieux D. Chemical bibliographic databases: The influence of term indexing policies on topic searches. New J Chem. 2015; 39:8807–8817.
4. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. Identification of environmentally relevant chemicals in bibliographic databases: a comparative analysis. Springerplus. 2013; 2:255.
5. Cavacini A. What is the best database for computer science journal articles? Scientometrics. 2015; 102:2059–2071.
6. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28:1270–1275.
7. Nourbakhsh E, Nugent R, Wang H, Cevik C, Nugent K. Medical literature searches: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar. Health Info Libr J. 2012; 29:214–222.
8. Shariff SZ, Bejaimal SA, Sontrop JM, Iansavichus AV, Haynes RB, Weir MA, Garg AX. Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15:e164.
9. Jamali HR, Nabavi M. Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics. 2015; 105:1635–1651.
10. Haddaway NR, Collins AM, Coughlin D, Kirk S. The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0138237.
11. Freeman MK, Lauderdale SA, Kendrach MG, Woolley TW. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions. Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43:478–484.
12. Boeker M, Vach W, Motschall E. Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 13:131.
13. Wright JM, Cottrell DJ, Mir G. Searching for religion and mental health studies required health, social science, and grey literature databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67:800–810.
14. Saleh AA, Ratajeski MA, Bertolet M. Grey literature searching for health sciences systematic reviews: a prospective study of time spent and resources utilized. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2014; 9:28–50.
15. Metzendorf MI, Schulz M, Braun V. All information is not equal: using the literature databases PubMed and the Cochrane Library for identifying the evidence on granulocyte transfusion therapy. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014; 41:364–374.
16. Vassar M, Carr B, Kash-Holley M, DeWitt E, Koller C, Day J, Day K, Herrmann D, Holzmann M. Database choices in endocrine systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015; 103:189–192.
17. Emami-Naini A, Roomizadeh P, Baradaran A, Abedini A, Abtahi M. Ramadan fasting and patients with renal diseases: a mini review of the literature. J Res Med Sci. 2013; 18:711–716.
18. Martín-Valero R, De La Casa Almeida M, Casuso-Holgado MJ, Heredia-Madrazo A. Systematic review of inspiratory muscle training after cerebrovascular accident. Respir Care. 2015; 60:1652–1659.
19. Liljekvist MS, Andresen K, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J. For 481 biomedical open access journals, articles are not searchable in the Directory of Open Access Journals nor in conventional biomedical databases. PeerJ. 2015; 3:e972.
20. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Diyanova SN, Kitas GD. Publishing ethics and predatory practices: a dilemma for all stakeholders of science communication. J Korean Med Sci. 2015; 30:1010–1016.
21. Barillot MJ, Sarrut B, Doreau CG. Evaluation of drug interaction document citation in nine on-line bibliographic databases. Ann Pharmacother. 1997; 31:45–49.
22. Rogers TL, Wallick D. Reviewing the use of ethylcellulose, methylcellulose and hypromellose in microencapsulation. Part 1: materials used to formulate microcapsules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012; 38:129–157.
23. Gasparini R, Amicizia D, Lai PL, Bragazzi NL, Panatto D. Compounds with anti-influenza activity: present and future of strategies for the optimal treatment and management of influenza. Part II: Future compounds against influenza virus. J Prev Med Hyg. 2014; 55:109–129.
24. Deurenberg R, Vlayen J, Guillo S, Oliver TK, Fervers B, Burgers J. SEARCH Group. Standardization of search methods for guideline development: an international survey of evidence-based guideline development groups. Health Info Libr J. 2008; 25:23–30.
25. Bucur M, Adams C. Romanian psychiatric literature: analysis of accessibility and nature of Romanian psychiatric articles. Health Info Libr J. 2010; 27:140–147.
26. Smith TO, Purdy R, Latham SK, Kingsbury SR, Mulley G, Conaghan PG. The prevalence, impact and management of musculoskeletal disorders in older people living in care homes: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2016; 36:55–64.
27. Matcham F, Rayner L, Steer S, Hotopf M. The prevalence of depression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013; 52:2136–2148.
28. Allen MP, Allison MM, Stevens S. Mapping the literature of nursing education. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006; 94:E122–7.
29. Shams ML, Dixon LS. Mapping selected general literature of international nursing. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007; 95:e1–e5.
30. Briscoe S, Cooper C. The British Nursing Index and CINAHL: a comparison of journal title coverage and the implications for information professionals. Health Info Libr J. 2014; 31:195–203.
31. Lee MS, Pittler MH, Ernst E. Tai chi for rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46:1648–1651.
32. Baker PR, Francis DP, Soares J, Weightman AL, Foster C. Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1:CD008366.
33. Lawrence DW, Laflamme L. Using online databases to find journal articles on injury prevention and safety promotion research: key journals and the databases that index them. Inj Prev. 2008; 14:91–95.
34. Farrow A, Reynolds F. Health and safety of the older worker. Occup Med (Lond). 2012; 62:4–11.
35. Polinder S, Segui-Gomez M, Toet H, Belt E, Sethi D, Racioppi F, van Beeck EF. Systematic review and quality assessment of economic evaluation studies of injury prevention. Accid Anal Prev. 2012; 45:211–221.
36. Kennedy AJ, Maple MJ, McKay K, Brumby SA. Suicide and accidental death in Australia’s rural farming communities: a review of the literature. Rural Remote Health. 2014; 14:2517.
37. Gouttebarge V, Inklaar H, Backx F, Kerkhoffs G. Prevalence of osteoarthritis in former elite athletes: a systematic overview of the recent literature. Rheumatol Int. 2015; 35:405–418.
38. Carroll M, Dalbeth N, Boocock M, Rome K. The assessment of lesions of the Achilles tendon by ultrasound imaging in inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015; 45:103–114.
39. Outermans J, van de Port I, Wittink H, de Groot J, Kwakkel G. How strongly is aerobic capacity correlated with walking speed and distance after stroke? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2015; 95:835–853.
40. Delwiche FA, Hall EF. Mapping the literature of athletic training. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007; 95:195–201.
41. Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Moseley AM. PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2000; 5:223–226.
42. Costa LO, Moseley AM, Sherrington C, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Elkins MR. Core journals that publish clinical trials of physical therapy interventions. Phys Ther. 2010; 90:1631–1640.
43. O’Dwyer T, O’Shea F, Wilson F. Exercise therapy for spondyloarthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2014; 34:887–902.
44. Daffada PJ, Walsh N, McCabe CS, Palmer S. The impact of cortical remapping interventions on pain and disability in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2015; 101:25–33.
45. O’Dwyer T, O’Shea F, Wilson F. Physical activity in spondyloarthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2015; 35:393–404.
46. Schaefer N. Disability search tips and resources. Med Ref Serv Q. 2015; 34:60–74.
47. Grindlay DJ, Brennan ML, Dean RS. Searching the veterinary literature: a comparison of the coverage of veterinary journals by nine bibliographic databases. J Vet Med Educ. 2012; 39:404–412.
48. Chan HM, Ing A. A database for environmental contaminants in traditional food in northern Canada. Int J Circumpolar Health. 1998; 57:Suppl 1. 567–571.
49. McPartland JM, Pruitt PL. Side effects of pharmaceuticals not elicited by comparable herbal medicines: the case of tetrahydrocannabinol and marijuana. Altern Ther Health Med. 1999; 5:57–62.
50. Stabler SN, Tejani AM, Huynh F, Fowkes C. Garlic for the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 8:CD007653.
51. Hempel S, Newberry SJ, Maher AR, Wang Z, Miles JN, Shanman R, Johnsen B, Shekelle PG. Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012; 307:1959–1969.
52. Falzon LC, O’Neill TJ, Menzies PI, Peregrine AS, Jones-Bitton A, vanLeeuwen J, Mederos A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with anthelmintic resistance in sheep. Prev Vet Med. 2014; 117:388–402.
53. Bartol T. Assessment of classification and indexing of an agricultural journal based on metadata in AGRIS and CAB Abstracts databases. Int J Metadata Semant Ontol. 2009; 4:4–12.
54. Celli F, Malapela T, Wegner K, Subirats I, Kokoliou E, Keizer J. AGRIS: providing access to agricultural research data exploiting open data on the web. F1000 Res. 2015; 4:110.
55. Venn BJ, Mann JI. Cereal grains, legumes and diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 58:1443–1461.
56. Park S, Szonyi B, Gautam R, Nightingale K, Anciso J, Ivanek R. Risk factors for microbial contamination in fruits and vegetables at the preharvest level: a systematic review. J Food Prot. 2012; 75:2055–2081.
57. Peluso I, Raguzzini A, Serafini M. Effect of flavonoids on circulating levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013; 57:784–801.
58. Bansback N, Ara R, Karnon J, Anis A. Economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis: a critical review of measures used to define health states. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008; 26:395–408.
59. Demarré L, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S, Grypdonck M, Lemey J, Annemans L, Beeckman D. The cost of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52:1754–1774.
60. Rashidian A, Omidvari AH, Vali Y, Sturm H, Oxman AD. Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 8:CD006731.
61. Wolbring G, Lashewicz B. Home care technology through an ability expectation lens. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16:e155.
62. Hawley-Hague H, Boulton E, Hall A, Pfeiffer K, Todd C. Older adults’ perceptions of technologies aimed at falls prevention, detection or monitoring: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014; 83:416–426.
63. Booth V, Masud T, Connell L, Bath-Hextall F. The effectiveness of virtual reality interventions in improving balance in adults with impaired balance compared with standard or no treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2014; 28:419–431.
64. Farmer SE, Durairaj V, Swain I, Pandyan AD. Assistive technologies: can they contribute to rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95:968–985.
65. Bhaskaran K, Hajat S, Haines A, Herrett E, Wilkinson P, Smeeth L. Effects of ambient temperature on the incidence of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2009; 95:1760–1769.
66. Charreire H, Casey R, Salze P, Simon C, Chaix B, Banos A, Badariotti D, Weber C, Oppert JM. Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems: a methodological review. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13:1773–1785.
67. Thomson H, Thomas S, Sellstrom E, Petticrew M. Housing improvements for health and associated socio-economic outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2:CD008657.
68. Cann KF, Thomas DR, Salmon RL, Wyn-Jones AP, Kay D. Extreme water-related weather events and waterborne disease. Epidemiol Infect. 2013; 141:671–686.
69. McKenna C, Wade R, Faria R, Yang H, Stirk L, Gummerson N, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2012; 16:1–188.
70. Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7:CD006185.
71. Marcano Belisario JS, Huckvale K, Greenfield G, Car J, Gunn LH. Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 11:CD010013.
72. Schloman BF. Mapping the literature of health education. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997; 85:278–283.
73. Burtis AT, Taylor MK. Mapping the literature of health education: 2006-2008. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010; 98:293–299.
74. Dray J, Bowman J, Wolfenden L, Campbell E, Freund M, Hodder R, Wiggers J. Systematic review of universal resilience interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting: review protocol. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:186.
75. Alkhateeb JM, Hadidi MS, Alkhateeb AJ. Inclusion of children with developmental disabilities in Arab countries: a review of the research literature from 1990 to 2014. Res Dev Disabil. 2016; 49-50:60–75.
76. Piromchai P, Avery A, Laopaiboon M, Kennedy G, O’Leary S. Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 9:CD010198.
77. Edwards D, Hawker C, Carrier J, Rees C. A systematic review of the effectiveness of strategies and interventions to improve the transition from student to newly qualified nurse. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015; 52:1254–1268.
78. Meho LI, Spurgin KM. Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: an evaluation of data sources and research methods. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2005; 56:1314–1331.
79. Horsley T, Dingwall O, Sampson M. Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; MR000026.
80. Fiander M, McGowan J, Grad R, Pluye P, Hannes K, Labrecque M, Roberts NW, Salzwedel DM, Welch V, Tugwell P. Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 3:CD004749.
81. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011; 31:1409–1417.
82. Hicks R, Pierson CA. Author and journal responsibilities postpublication: the relationship continues. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2014; 26:463–464.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr