J Gastric Cancer.  2011 Jun;11(2):94-100.

Evaluation of the 7th AJCC TNM Staging System in Point of Lymph Node Classification

• Kim SH
• Ha TK
• Kwon SJ

Abstract

PURPOSE
The 7th AJCC tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system modified the classification of the lymph node metastasis widely compared to the 6th edition. To evaluate the prognostic predictability of the new TNM staging system, we analyzed the survival rate of the gastric cancer patients assessed by the 7th staging system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Among 2,083 patients who underwent resection for gastric cancer at the department of surgery, Hanyang Medical Center from July 1992 to December 2009, This study retrospectively reviewed 5-year survival rate (5YSR) of 624 patients (TanyN3M0: 464 patients, TanyNanyM1: 160 patients) focusing on the number of metastatic lymph node and distant metastasis. We evaluated the applicability of the new staging system.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in 5YSR between stage IIIC with more than 29 metastatic lymph nodes and stage IV (P=0.053). No significant differences were observed between stage IIIB with more than 28 metastatic lymph nodes and stage IV (P=0.093). Distinct survival differences were present between patients who were categorized as TanyN3M0 with 7 to 32 metastatic lymph nodes and stage IV. But patients with more than 33 metastatic lymph nodes did not show any significant differences compared to stage IV (P=0.055). Among patients with TanyN3M0, statistical significances were seen between patients with 7 to 30 metastatic lymph nodes and those with more than 31 metastatic lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS
In the new staging system, modifications of N classification is mandatory to improve prognostic prediction. Further study involving a greater number of cases is required to demonstrate the most appropriate cutoffs for N classification.

Keyword

Stomach neoplasms; Neoplasm staging; Lymph nodes

MeSH Terms

Humans
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms
Survival Rate

Reference

1. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (UICC). 2002. 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss;65–68.

2. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG. AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 2009. 7th ed. New York: Springer.

3. Dukes CE. The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1932. 35:323–332.

4. Denoix PF. Nomenclature classification des cancers. Bull Inst Natl Hyg. 1952. 7:743–748.

5. Sayegh ME, Sano T, Dexter S, Katai H, Fukagawa T, Sasako M. TNM and Japanese staging systems for gastric cancer: how do they coexist? Gastric Cancer. 2004. 7:140–148.

6. Japenese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Japenese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma; General Rules for the Gastric Cancer Study. 1995. 1st ed. Tokyo: Kanehara.

7. Roder JD, Böttcher K, Busch R, Wittekind C, Hermanek P, Siewert JR. German Gastric Cancer Study Group. Classification of regional lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1998. 82:621–631.

8. Cozzaglio L, Doci R, Celotti S, Roncalli M, Gennari L. Gastric cancer: extent of lymph node dissection and requirements for a correct staging. Tumori. 2004. 90:467–472.

9. Giuliani A, Caporale A, Corona M, Di Bari M, Demoro M, Ricciardulli T, et al. Lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: influence on prognosis of lymph node count. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004. 23:215–224.

10. Katai H, Yoshimura K, Maruyama K, Sasako M, Sano T. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000. 88:1796–1800.

11. Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg. 2000. 232:362–371.

12. Klein Kranenbarg E, Hermans J, van Krieken JH, van de Velde CJ. Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value. Br J Cancer. 2001. 84:64–71.

13. Mendes de Almeida JC, Limbert M, Mendes de Almeida JM. Does the new TNM classification (1997) improve prognostic stratification in gastric cancer submitted to R0 surgery? Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999. 25:280–283.

14. de Manzoni G, Verlato G, Guglielmi A, Laterza E, Tomezzoli A, Pelosi G, et al. Classification of lymph node metastases from carcinoma of the stomach: comparison of the old (1987) and new (1997) TNM systems. World J Surg. 1999. 23:664–669.

15. Lee WJ, Hong RL, Lai IR, Chen CN, Lee PH, Chung KC. Reappraisal of the new UICC staging system for gastric cancer: problem in lymph node stage. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002. 49:860–864.

16. Hermanek P. The superiority of the new International Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000. 88:1763–1765.

17. Kato M, Saji S, Kawaguchi Y, Kunieda K, Sugiyama Y, Takagi Y, et al. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999. 46:3281–3286.

18. Fujii K, Isozaki H, Okajima K, Nomura E, Niki M, Sako S, et al. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surg. 1999. 86:685–689.

19. Yoo CH, Noh SH, Kim YI, Min JS. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer. World J Surg. 1999. 23:492–497.

20. Klein Kranenbarg E, Hermans J, van Krieken JH, van de Velde CJ. Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value. Br J Cancer. 2001. 84:64–71.

21. Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, Kimura M, Uchida T, Morita D, et al. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999. 86:553–558.

22. Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, Shimada H, Hori S, Takeda A, et al. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric carcinoma. Surgery. 2000. 127:129–135.

23. Greene FL, Sobin LH. The staging of cancer: a retrospective and prospective appraisal. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008. 58:180–190.

24. Ha TK, Kim HJ, Kwon SJ. Does the new UICC/AJCC TNM staging system (7th Edition) improve assessing prognosis in gastric cancer compared to the old system (6th Edition)? J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2009. 9:159–166.