J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2016 Dec;51(6):493-502. 10.4055/jkoa.2016.51.6.493.

A Comparison of Clinical Results between Compression Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nail as the Treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2.2 Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea. shoulder2011@dongguk.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study compared the clinical results between compression hip screw (CHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN) after the treatment of AO/OTA A2.2 intertrochanteric (ITC) fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 125 cases of AO/OTA A2.2 ITC fracture, treated with either CHS (group I, 34 cases) or PFN (group II, 91 cases) between March 1994 and December 2014. We evaluated the mean operation time, estimated blood loss and transfusion, hospitalization stay, sliding length of lag screw, tip-apex distance, change of neck shaft angle, mean union time, weight bearing time, mechanical failure, and ambulatory ability by the Parker and Palmer mobility scores.
RESULTS
Operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion, hospitalization stay, tip-apex distance, change of neck-shaft angle, and Parker and Palmer mobility scores were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). However, the mean sliding length of lag screw was 8.15 mm and 3.94 mm for group I and II, respectively, the mean union time was 16.85 weeks and 15.57 weeks, respectively, and the mean full weight bearing time was 4.54 weeks and 2.31 weeks, respectively. The mean sliding length of lag screw, union time, and full weight bearing time all had statistical significance (p<0.05). There were a total of 3 cases of postoperative complications in group I and 4 cases in group II.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that PFN is more reliable than CHS as a treatment method for AO/OTA A2.2 intertrochanteric fracture.

Keyword

femur; intertrochanteric fractures; compression hip screw; proximal femur nail

MeSH Terms

Femoral Fractures*
Femur
Hip Fractures
Hip*
Hospitalization
Methods
Neck
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Weight-Bearing

Figure

  • Figure 1 A 65-year-old man with intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail. (A) Initial radiograph shows unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur with detached lesser trochanter. (B) Initial three-dimensional computed tomography shows AO/OTA 31-A2.2 fracture. (C) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows acceptable reduction and internal fixation with proximal femoral nail. (D) At postoperative 9 months, the radiograph with external rotation shows complete union of the fracture site with solid union of the lesser trochanter.

  • Figure 2 A 62-year-old man with intertrochanteric fracture fixed with compression hip screw. (A) Initial radiograph shows unstable AO/OTA 31-A2.2 fracture of the femur. (B) Immediate postoperative radiograph shows acceptable reduction and internal fixation with compression hip screw. (C) At postoperative 4 weeks, the radiography shows sliding of lag screw and medialization of the distal femur. (D) Radiography obtained 2 years after the initial surgery shows removal of compression hip screw and solid union of fracture site.


Reference

1. Nuber S, Schönweiss T, Rüter A. Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN). Unfallchirurg. 2003; 106:39–47.
2. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73:330–334.
Article
3. Kaufer H. Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; (146):53–61.
Article
4. Chung PH, Kang S, Kim JP, Kim YS, Lee HM, Kim JH. A comparison between compression hip screw and intramedullary nail for the treatment of AO/OTA A2.2 intertrochanteric femoral fracture. J Korean Fract Soc. 2013; 26:44–49.
Article
5. Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124:31–37.
Article
6. Doppelt SH. The sliding compression screw: today's best answer for stabilization of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1980; 11:507–523.
7. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75:797–798.
Article
8. Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK. International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res. 2002; 17:1237–1244.
Article
9. Rowe SM, Bae BH, Park YB, Cheon SY, Kang KD. Mortality following hip fracture. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2005; 40:1094–1095.
10. Kim DS, Shon HC, Kim YM, Choi ES, Park KJ, Im SH. Postoperative mortality and the associated factors for senile hip fracture patients. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2008; 43:488–494.
Article
11. Lee SR, Kim SR, Chung KH, et al. Mortality and activity after hip fracture: a prospective study. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2005; 40:423–427.
Article
12. Hwang CS, Chung PH, Kang S, Kim TH, Kim HC, Kim YS. Comparison between results of treatment of the femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures: focused on mortality rate and complications. J Korean Soc Fract. 1999; 12:792–802.
13. Jensen JS, Sonne-Holm S, Tøndevold E. Unstable trochanteric fractures. A comparative analysis of four methods of internal fixation. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980; 51:949–962.
14. Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS. Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury. 1995; 26:615–618.
Article
15. Hardy DC, Descamps PY, Krallis P, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80:618–630.
Article
16. Kyle RF, Wright TM, Burmstein AH. Biomechanical analysis of the sliding characteristics of compression hip screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62:1308–1314.
Article
17. Babst R, Renner N, Biedermann M, et al. Clinical results using the trochanter stabilizing plate (TSP): the modular extension of the dynamic hip screw (DHS) for internal fixation of selected unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1998; 12:392–399.
Article
18. Wolfgang GL, Bryant MH, O'Neill JP. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (163):148–158.
Article
19. Park SW, Baek JR, Moon IS. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: comparison between DHS and additional TSP. J Korean Soc Fract. 2003; 16:9–14.
Article
20. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW. Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures. A randomised prospective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:345–351.
Article
21. Chevalley F, Gamba D. Gamma nailing of pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: clinical results of a series of 63 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11:412–415.
Article
22. Kang JS, Park SR, Kim HS, Lee WH, Kim KW, Lee JH. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a retrospective matched pair study. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2001; 36:423–428.
Article
23. Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS. A biomechanical evaluation of the gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:352–357.
Article
24. Haynes RC, Pöll RG, Miles AW, Weston RB. Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut-out with the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw. Injury. 1997; 28:337–341.
Article
25. Kawaguchi S, Sawada K, Nabeta Y. Cutting-out of the lag screw after internal fixation with the Asiatic gamma nail. Injury. 1998; 29:47–53.
Article
26. Lindsey RW, Teal P, Probe RA, Rhoads D, Davenport S, Schauder K. Early experience with the gamma interlocking nail for peritrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. J Trauma. 1991; 31:1649–1658.
Article
27. Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Muñoz FM, Tufanisco CB. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19:229–233.
28. Jacobs RR, McClain O, Armstrong HJ. Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; (146):62–70.
29. Steinberg GG, Desai SS, Kornwitz NA, Sullivan TJ. The intertrochanteric hip fracture. A retrospective analysis. Orthopedics. 1988; 11:265–273.
Article
30. Gotfried Y. The lateral trochanteric wall: a key element in the reconstruction of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (425):82–86.
Full Text Links
  • JKOA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr