Imaging Sci Dent.  2016 Dec;46(4):239-244. 10.5624/isd.2016.46.4.239.

Brazilian young dental practitioners' use and acceptance of digital radiographic examinations

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Sao Paulo, Brazil. karlarovaris@gmail.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to investigate the use and acceptance of digital radiographic examinations by Brazilian dental practitioners in daily practice and to evaluate the advances that have occurred over the past 5 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Dental practitioners enrolled in extension courses at the Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Brazil, responded to a self-administered questionnaire in the years 2011 and 2015. They were asked about sociodemographic factors and their knowledge and use of digital radiographic examinations. Descriptive analysis was performed, as well as the chi-square and Fisher exact tests, with a significance level of 5% (α=0.05).
RESULTS
A total of 181 participants responded to the questionnaire in the years 2011 and 2015. Most of the respondents worked in private practice, had graduated within the last 5 years, and were between 20 and 30 years old. In 2011, 55.6% of respondents reported having ever used digital radiographic examinations, while in 2015 this number increased significantly to 85.4% (p<.0001), out of which 71.4% preferred it to conventional images. Moreover, 21.4% of respondents reported having used digital radiographic examinations for more than 3 years. A significant increase in use of intraoral digital radiography (p=0.0316) was observed in 2015. In both years, image quality and high cost were indicated, respectively, as the main advantage and disadvantage of digital radiographic examinations.
CONCLUSION
This study showed that digital radiology has become more common in Brazil over the past 5 years. Most of the Brazilian dental practitioners evaluated in 2015 used digital radiographic examinations.

Keyword

Radiography, Digital, Dental; Knowledge; Dentists; General Practice, Dental

MeSH Terms

Brazil
Dentists
General Practice, Dental
Humans
Private Practice
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Schools, Dental
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Brennan J. An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry. J Orthod. 2002; 29:66–69.
Article
2. Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, Van der Stelt PF. A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002; 31:93–99.
Article
3. Wenzel A. A review of dentists' use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35:307–314.
Article
4. Brian JN, Williamson GF. Digital radiography in dentistry: a survey of Indiana dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36:18–23.
Article
5. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Decision criteria and characteristics of Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001; 30:197–202.
Article
6. Dölekoğlu S, Fişekçioğlu E, İlgüy M, İlgüy D. The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40:379–384.
Article
7. Wenzel A, Grondahl HG. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J. 1995; 45:27–34.
8. Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998; 27:3–11.
Article
9. Wenzel A. Matters to consider when implementing direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int J Comput Dent. 1999; 2:269–290.
10. van der Stelt PF. Filmless imaging: the uses of digital radiography in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136:1379–1387.
11. Saliba NA, Moimaz SA, Garbin CA, Diniz DG. Dentistry in Brazil: its history and current trends. J Dent Educ. 2009; 73:225–231.
Article
12. Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K. Questionnaire surveys of dentists on radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41:267–275.
Article
13. Aps JK. Flemish general dental practitioners' knowledge of dental radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:113–118.
Article
14. Wenzel A, Møystad A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010; 68:106–114.
Article
15. Davies C, Grange S, Trevor MM. Radiation protection practices and related continuing professional education in dental radiography: a survey of practitioners in the North-east of England. Radiography. 2005; 11:255–261.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ISD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr