Korean J Adult Nurs.  2016 Apr;28(2):191-201. 10.7475/kjan.2016.28.2.191.

Validity and Reliability Test of the Korean Version of the Oncology Patients' Perception of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale

Affiliations
  • 1College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, Wonju, Korea.
  • 4College of Nursing · Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. esuh@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this methodological study was to examine the validity and reliability of a translated Korean version of The Oncology Patients' Perception of the Quality of Nursing Care Scale.
METHODS
The translated scale was pilot tested and then administered to 360 patients with cancer. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were utilized to assess the factor structure. Internal consistency reliability was determined using coefficient α.
RESULTS
Two of the 40 items were deleted with a principal component method of exploratory factor analysis because they did not meet the factor-loading criterion. The 38 items were again analyzed and, four factors were validated (KMO=.96, Bartlett χ2=10809.81, df=780, p<.001). The four factors accounted for 60.9% of the variance. Factor loadings of the scale on the four subscales ranged from .65 to .91. The scale showed reliable internal consistency with a Cronbach's α, total 38 items (α=.96) in four subscales: individualization (18 items, α=.96), proficiency (10, .91), responsiveness (7, .90), and coordination (3, .80).
CONCLUSION
The findings of this study demonstrate that the scale has satisfactory construct validity and reliability to measure quality of cancer nursing care from the patient's perspective in Korea.


MeSH Terms

Humans
Korea
Methods
Nursing Care*
Nursing*
Oncology Nursing
Patient-Centered Care
Quality of Health Care
Reproducibility of Results*

Reference

1.Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press;2001.
2.Epstein RM., Street RL Jr. Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. NIH Publication: National Cancer Institute;2007. Report No.: 07-6225.
3.Suhonen R., Schmidt LA., Radwin L. Measuring individualized nursing care: assessment of reliability and validity of three scales. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2007. 59(1):77–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04282.x.
Article
4.Radwin LE., Farquhar SL., Knowles MN., Virchick BG. Cancer patients'descriptions of their nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005. 50(2):162–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03375.x.
5.Lee MA., Yom Y-H. A comparative study of patients'and nurses'perceptions of the quality of nursing services, satisfaction and intent to revisit the hospital: a questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2007. 44(4):545–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.03.006.
6.Radwin L., Alster K., Rubin KM. Development and testing of the oncology patients' perceptions of the quality of nursing care scale. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2003. 30(2):283–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/03.onf.283-290.
Article
7.Kitson A., Marshall A., Bassett K., Zeitz K. What are the core elements of patient centred care? a narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013. 69(1):4–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06064.x.
8.Izumi S., Baggs JG., Knafl KA. Quality nursing care for hospitalized patients with advanced illness: concept development. Research in Nursing & Health. 2010. 33(4):299–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20391.
Article
9.Larson PJ., Ferketich SL. Patients' satisfaction with nurses' caring during hospitalization. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1993. 15(6):690–703.
Article
10.Mitchell PH., Heinrich J., Moritz P., Hinshaw AS. Measurement into practice: summary and recommendations. Medical Care. 1997. 35(11):NS124–7.
11.Köberich S., Farin E. A systematic review of instruments measuring patients' perceptions of patient centred nursing care. Nursing Inquiry. 2015. 22(2):106–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nin.12078.
12.Sidani S., Collins L., Harbman P., MacMillan K., Reeves S., Hurlock Chorostecki C, et al. Development of a measure to assess healthcare providers'implementation of patient centered care. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing. 2014. 11(4):248–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12047.
13.Radwin L. Oncology patients' perceptions of quality nursing care. Research in Nursing & Health. 2000. 23(3):179–90.
Article
14.Radwin LE., Cabral HJ., Wilkes G. Relationships between patient centered cancer nursing interventions and desired health outcomes in the context of the health care system. Research in Nursing & Health. 2009. 32(1):4–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20302.
15.National Cancer Center. 2013 Cancer registry statistics in Korea. Seoul; Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Central Cancer Registry: National Cancer Center;2015.
16.DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc;2003.
17.Comrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1988. 56(5):754–61.
Article
18.Kim GS. Structural equation modeling analysis: Amos 18.0. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Co;2010.
19.Schmitt TA. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2011. 29(4):304–21.
Article
20.Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1970. 1(3):185–216.
Article
21.Duffy ME. Translating instruments into other languages: basic considerations. Clinical Nurse Specialist. 2006. 20(5):225–6.
22.Lee E., Lim N., Park H., Lee I., Kim J., Bae J, et al. Nursing research and statistical analysis. Paju: Soomoomsa Publishing;2009.
23.Yu J-P. The concept and understanding of structural equation modeling. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Co;2012.
24.Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013. 43(5):587–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587.
Article
25.Tak J. Psychological testing: an understanding of development and evaluation method. 2nd ed. Seoul: Hakjisa;2007.
26.Kang J., Suh EE. Perceptions of quality of patient-centered nursing care among women with breast cancer. Perspectives in Nursing Science. 2015. 12(2):115–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.16952/pns.2015.12.2.115.
Article
27.Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974. 39(1):31–6.
Article
28.Bagozzi RP., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 1988. 16(1):74–94.
Article
29.Fornell C., Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981. 18(1):39–50.
Article
30.Nunnally JC., Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill;1994.
31.Larrabee J., Bolden L. Defining patient-perceived quality of nursing care. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2001. 16(1):34–60.
Article
32.Sofaer S., Firminger K. Patient perceptions of the quality of health services. Annual Reviews of Public Health. 2005. 26:513–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.050503.153958.
Article
33.Williams SA. Quality and care: patients' perceptions. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 1998. 12(6):18–25.
Article
34.Lee T., Kang KH., Ko YK., Cho S-H., Kim EY. Issues and challenges of nurse workforce policy: a critical review and implication. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2014. 20(1):106–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2014.20.1.106.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJAN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr