J Periodontal Implant Sci.  2016 Aug;46(4):234-243. 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.234.

The feasibility of immediately loading dental implants in edentulous jaws

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. a.henningsen@uke.de
  • 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
  • 3Private Practice for Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Oppenheim, Germany.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Immediate loading of dental implants has been proved to be feasible in partially edentulous jaws. The purpose of this retrospective investigation was to assess the feasibility of immediately loading dental implants in fully edentulous jaws.
METHODS
A total of 24 patients aged between 53 and 89 years received a total of 154 implants in their edentulous maxillae or mandibles. Among the implants, 45 were set in fresh extracted sockets and 109 in consolidated alveolar bones. The implants were provisionally managed with chair-side made provisional resin bridges and exposed to immediate loading. Implants were followed up for 1-8 years, including radiographic imaging. Marginal bone levels were evaluated based on radiographic imaging.
RESULTS
A total of 148 out of the 154 implants survived over the follow-up period of 1 to 8 years, giving a survival rate of 96%. The time or region of the implantation, the pre-implant augmentation, and the length and diameter of the implants had no statistically significant influence on the survival or the success rate. The marginal bone level remained stable with only minimal loss of 0.3 mm after 60 months of loading.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of this study, immediate loading is feasible for dental implants in edentulous jaws.

Keyword

Dental implants; Immediate dental implant loading; Jaw, edentulous

MeSH Terms

Dental Implants*
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immediate Dental Implant Loading
Jaw, Edentulous*
Mandible
Maxilla
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Dental Implants

Figure

  • Figure 1 The change in bone level. Defining crestal bone level (CBL), implant shoulder (IS) and the distance between both (DIB).

  • Figure 2 The original data of bone level change (against post-implant placement baseline) for each implant at each follow-up examination. Note that most measurements were during the period up to 48 months.


Reference

1. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50:399–410.
Article
2. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Maghaireh H, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; CD003878.
Article
3. Chiapasco M, Gatti C, Rossi E, Haefliger W, Markwalder TH. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading. A retrospective multicenter study on 226 consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997; 8:48–57.
Article
4. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year prospective cohort follow-up of immediately restored XiVE implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27:694–700.
Article
5. Ganeles J, Wismeijer D. Early and immediately restored and loaded dental implants for single-tooth and partial-arch applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19:Suppl. 92–102.
6. Mozzati M, Arata V, Gallesio G, Mussano F, Carossa S. Immediate postextractive dental implant placement with immediate loading on four implants for mandibular-full-arch rehabilitation: a retrospective analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 15:332–340.
Article
7. Peñarrocha M, Boronat A, Garcia B. Immediate loading of immediate mandibular implants with a full-arch fixed prosthesis: a preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:1286–1293.
Article
8. Romanos GE. Present status of immediate loading of oral implants. J Oral Implantol. 2004; 30:189–197.
Article
9. Romanos GE, Aydin E, Locher K, Nentwig GH. Immediate vs. delayed loading in the posterior mandible: a split-mouth study with up to 15 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27:e74–9.
Article
10. Horiuchi K, Uchida H, Yamamoto K, Sugimura M. Immediate loading of Brånemark system implants following placement in edentulous patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15:824–830.
11. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol. 2001; 72:1560–1571.
Article
12. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18:189–199.
13. De Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: a 1-year case cohort study on hard and soft tissue response. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35:649–657.
Article
14. Araújo MG, Sukekava F, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17:615–624.
Article
15. Araújo MG, Wennström JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17:606–614.
Article
16. Kawahara H, Kawahara D, Hayakawa M, Tamai Y, Kuremoto T, Matsuda S. Osseointegration under immediate loading: biomechanical stress-strain and bone formation--resorption. Implant Dent. 2003; 12:61–68.
Article
17. Testori T, Meltzer A, Del Fabbro M, Zuffetti F, Troiano M, Francetti L, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in the lower edentulous jaw. A multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:278–284.
Article
18. Brånemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO, Gröndahl K, Nilsson P, Hagberg K, et al. Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 1999; 1:2–16.
Article
19. Gross JS. Bone grafting materials for dental applications: a practical guide. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997; 18:1013–1018. 1020–1012.
20. Kornmann F. Sofortige provisorische Versorgung bzw. Belastung nach Sofort- und/oder Spätimplantation. Quintessenz. 2010; 61:699–707.
21. Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11:Suppl 1. 59–68.
Article
22. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989; 9:332–343.
23. Lazzara RJ. Effect of implant position on implant restoration design. J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5:265–269.
Article
24. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008; 17:5–15.
Article
25. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990; 1:33–40.
Article
26. Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Evaluation of measurement error 1: using intraclass correlation coefficients. Restor Dent Endod. 2013; 38:98–102.
Article
27. Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21:115–121.
Article
28. Canullo L, Goglia G, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Short-term bone level observations associated with platform switching in immediately placed and restored single maxillary implants: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22:277–282.
29. Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MC. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:Suppl 5. 39–66.
Article
30. Kacer CM, Dyer JD, Kraut RA. Immediate loading of dental implants in the anterior and posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 120 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68:2861–2867.
Article
31. Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Haas R, Watzek G, Mailath G, Pommer B. Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014; 44:102–108.
Article
32. Schindjalova R. Immediate implantation in retrospect – a study regarding success and failure of implantations. Z Zahnärztl Implantol. 2015; 31:132–139.
33. Imburgia M, Del Fabbro M. Long-term retrospective clinical and radiographic follow-up of 205 Brånemark System Mk III TiUnite implants submitted to either immediate or delayed loading. Implant Dent. 2015; 24:533–540.
Article
34. Moraschini V, Porto Barboza E. Immediate versus conventional loaded single implants in the posterior mandible: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45:85–92.
Article
35. Francetti L, Rodolfi A, Barbaro B, Taschieri S, Cavalli N, Corbella S. Implant success rates in full-arch rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants: a retrospective investigation with up to five years of follow-up. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015; 45:210–215.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPIS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr