J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2011 Dec;46(6):451-456.

The Effect of Nerve Root Block on the Patients Who Are Considered as Surgical Candidates with Cervical Radicular Pain

• Shim DM
• Kim TK
• Chae SU
• Oh SK
• Im JC
• Song SY

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect and usefulness of cervical selective nerve root block in advance for the patients who was scheduled for operation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between January 2001 to December 2008, 28 cases were selected from the patients, who underwent selective nerve root block before operation. The mean follow-up period was 30.4 months and the mean age was 59.2 years. The patients were divided into the operation group and the only cervical nerve root block group. The groups were compared for age, gender, the contraction period and the, solidity of the disc. The groups were radiologically evaluated for the existence of cervical spondylosis and the neural compression rate. The clinical results were analyzed using the neck disability index (NDI) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score.
RESULTS
Among the 28 cases that were scheduled for operation, 18 cases did not proceed to operation and 10 cases among them were treated with additional conservative treatment. The average VAS score for the operation group and the cervical nerve root block group was 8.3 and 7.7 at the preoperative state and the preinjection state, respectively. After surgical treatment and cervical nerve root block, the scores were 3.2 and 3.6, respectively. The NDI for the operation group was 40.6 at the preoperative state and this decreased to 11.2 at the last follow up. The NDI for the cervical nerve root block group was 38.4 at the preinjection state and this decreased to 13.6 at the last follow up. The mean contraction period was 3.2 months and the mean age was 51.9 years for the operative group. The mean contraction period was 14.82 months and the mean age was 55.9 years for the root block group. There was no difference of clinical outcomes between the operative group and the cervical nerve root block group. The operation group's mean age was younger and the duration of symptom was shorter than those of the cervical nerve root block group.
CONCLUSION
Cervical nerve root block is considered to be an effective treatment for patients with cervical disc herniation with radiating pain and who are scheduled for an operation.

Keyword

cervical; radicular pain; nerve block

MeSH Terms

Contracts
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Neck
Nerve Block
Spondylosis

Reference

1. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994. 117:325–335.

2. Ahn JS. Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 1999. 6:185–183.

3. Tanaka Y, Kokubun S, Sato T. Cervical radiculopathy and its unsolved problems. Curr Orthop. 1998. 12:1–6.

4. Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971. 53:891–903.

5. Carette S, Leclaire R, Marcoux S, et al. Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. N Engl J Med. 1997. 336:1634–1640.

6. Riew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, et al. The effect of nerve-root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000. 82-A:1589–1593.

7. Oeppen RS. Discovery of the first local anaesthetic--Carl Koller (1857-1944). Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003. 41:243.

8. Rubinstein SM, Pool JJ, van Tulder MW, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007. 16:307–319.

9. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, et al. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998. 80:19–24.

10. Kuijper B, Tans JT, Schimsheimer RJ, et al. Degenerative cervical radiculopathy: diagnosis and conservative treatment. A review. Eur J Neurol. 2009. 16:15–20.

11. Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An HS, Ikuta Y, Yasuda M. The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000. 25:286–291.

12. Krempen JF, Smith BS. Nerve-root injection: a method for evaluating the etiology of sciatica. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974. 56:1435–1444.

13. Tajima T, Furukawa K, Kuramochi E. Selective lumbosacral radiculography and block. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980. 5:68–77.

14. Kikuchi S, Hasue M, Nishiyama K, Ito T. Anatomic and clinical studies of radicular symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984. 9:23–30.

15. Haueisen DC, Smith BS, Myers SR, Pryce ML. The diagnostic accuracy of spinal nerve injection studies. Their role in the evaluation of recurrent sciatica. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985. (198):179–183.

16. Slipman CW, Lipetz JS, Jackson HB, Rogers DP, Vresilovic EJ. Therapeutic selective nerve root block in the nonsurgical treatment of atraumatic cervical spondylotic radicular pain: a retrospective analysis with independent clinical review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000. 81:741–746.

17. Dooley JF, McBroom RJ, Taguchi T, Macnab I. Nerve root infi ltration in the diagnosis of radicular pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988. 13:79–83.

18. Shim DM, Kim TK, Song HH, You SS, Cho JD. The usefulness of selective spinal nerve root block. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2004. 11:48–54.

19. Hong YG, Sa SJ, Kim JD. Selective spinal nerve root block for the treatment of sciatica. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1997. 32:1056–1062.

20. Schellhas KP, Pollei SR, Johnson BA, Golden MJ, Eklund JA, Pobiel RS. Selective cervical nerve root blockade: experience with a safe and reliable technique using an anterolateral approach for needle placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007. 28:1909–1914.

21. Bush K, Hillier S. Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular/epidural corticosteroid injections: a prospective study with independent clinical review. Eur Spine J. 1996. 5:319–325.