J Korean Soc Med Inform.  2009 Dec;15(4):361-371.

Legislation Direction for Health Information Privacy in the Telemedicine Era

Affiliations
  • 1Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Korea.
  • 2College of Medicine, Department of Medical Law & Ethics, Yonsei University, Korea. syoonkim@yuhs.ac

Abstract

The Korean law on medicine was amended in 2003 to introduce new provisions for telemedicine, electronic medical record, and electronic prescription. However, this has not satisfied the realities of the increased demand on medical services and related technology development, resulting in calls for a legislative amendment. In this regard, recent active promotion projects and the advance notice proposing a new amendment by the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs have raised the need for active discussions on telemedicine because the current law on medicine and its amendment do not adequately address the individual privacy protection aspect in the telemedicine environment. In this regard, this study examines current domestic and foreign legal systems on telemedicine and privacy protection, drawing and reviewing subjects to be discussed for individual privacy protection in telemedicine, and proposes plans that may improve Korea's legal system. The domestic and foreign literature on telemedicine and privacy protection was reviewed, recent legislations on telemedicine and views of interest groups were considered, and expert opinions were collected. In addition, the main discussions on privacy protection in telemedicine were identified and reviewed, including information ownership, the scope of privacy protection, the right to review and request correction, and privacy protection matters related to foreign patients. The recent amendment to tele medicine contains a provision only on penalties for privacy protection violations. The main discussions in this study on privacy protection are expected to be reflected in future amendments to enforcement rules and sub-ordinances such as the enforcement ordinance.

Keyword

Telemedicine; Law; Privacy; Security; U-healthcare

MeSH Terms

Electronic Health Records
Electronic Prescribing
Expert Testimony
Humans
Jurisprudence
Ownership
Privacy
Public Opinion
Telemedicine

Reference

1. Hong SW. Legal considerations on telemedicine. 2002. Seoul: Yonsei University;66–67.
2. Chae YM. Study of the legal and policy issues for an improvement of e-Health. 2005. Seoul: MIHWAF;97–173.
3. Kim DM, Baeg WH. Personal privacy protection of electronic medical record in health information system. J Korean Soc Med Informatics. 2007. 13(3):249–257.
Article
4. Kang DC. Generalization trend of u-Health care service and direction of legal system for personal health information protection. Chung-Ang Law Associatio. 2008. 10(1):100–105.
5. Hodge JG Jr, Gostin LO, Jacobson PD. Legal Issues Concerning Electronic Health Information. JAMA. 1999. 282:1466–1481.
Article
6. Ju JH. Review on legal system for e-Health industrial development. Law and Policy Research. 2006. 6(1):159–161.
7. John DB, John J. The law and telemedicine. J Korean Soc Med Informatics. 2007. 13(1):1–7.
Article
8. Chae YM, Park JH, Kim SJ, Lee IY, Lee SK, Son MS. Legal aspect of health information systems in Korea. KJPH. 2001. 38(1):140–161.
9. KHIDI. Report of mid-to long-term comprehensive plan to activate u-Healthcare. 2008. Seoul: MIHWAF;564–599.
10. Lee SM. Legislative directions of individual medical information protection law. LCONA. 2007. 213:17–19.
11. Donahue M. Regulating telehealth in ontario-next step in the transformation agenda. Health Law Can. 2006. 27(1):5–28.
12. Mack J. Beyond HIPAA: ethics in the e-health arena. Ethical guidelines help ensure that credible health information appears on the Internet. Health Exec. 2004. 19:32–33.
13. Kwon KB. Individual privacy protection and right to control own information. 2005. Seoul: Kyoung In Publishing;14.
14. Park IK. Legal study on individual medical information protection. 2006. Seoul: Yonsei University;8.
15. Yonsei University Health Policy & Management Administration. Established Health Law System to Develop the Ground for National Health Improvement. 1999. Seoul: MIHWAF.
16. Yonsei University Health Policy & Management Administration. Legal Study on Advancing Millennium Health and Welfare Information. 2000. Seoul: MIHWAF.
17. Public Hearing on Enacting Health Information Law. 2007. In : Health and Welfare Committee of National Assembly; Seoul.
18. Choi IY, Lee JY, Choi S, KIM Sl. Inter-group comparisons on recognition for privacy protection of electronic health record. J Korean Soc Med Informatics. 2007. 13(3):202.
19. Choi HJ, Seo SW, Kim KH, Park WS, Pu YK, Cho HI. The fact-finding survey for medical information security management. J Korean Soc Med Informatics. 2000. 7(3):17–25.
Article
20. Gong CG. Security/Privacy of electronic health record. 2004. Seoul: MIHWAF;19.
21. Ju JH, Wang SH, Cho HW, Park M, Lee BR. Study on plans to amend legal system to activate medical information Industry. Law and Policy Research. 2003. 3(2):85.
22. Kim SK. Development of guidelines to promote international joint use of telemedicine. 2005. Seoul: Yonsei University Graduate School of Public Health;70–72.
Full Text Links
  • JKSMI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr