J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2011 Oct;37(5):343-348.

Reconsideration of decision making for third molar extraction

• Park W
• Kim JH
• Kang SH
• Kim MK
• Kim BC
• Choi JW
• Lee SH

Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Third molar extraction is one of the most common procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The impacted third molar causes many pathological conditions, such as pericoronitis, caries, periodontitis, resorption of adjacent teeth, and cyst or tumors associated with impacted teeth. Extraction is often considered the treatment of choice for impacted lower third molars. On the other hand, imprudent extraction of deeply impacted third molars can cause permanent complications, such as inferior alveolar nerve damage. Therefore, guidelines for the extraction of lower third molars should be set to prevent embarrassing complications. This study examined the indication and current trends of the extracted lower third molars in the dental hospital of a dental college.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
557 extracted third molars were evaluated at the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery of Yonsei University. The chief complaint, diagnosis, age and degree of impaction were analyzed to determine the tendency for the extraction of asymptomatic lower third molars.
RESULTS
The percentage of asymptomatic third molars was 40.8%. In cases of full impacted tooth or full erupted tooth, the percentage of asymptomatic teeth was more than 50% (52.4% and 54.3, respectively). Among those partially impacted teeth, 73.1% of them showed symptoms, such as pain, tenderness and swelling. In terms of age, pericoronitis was evident at a younger age, and dental caries/periodontitis was the main cause of removal in those aged over 50. Twenty nine cases (1.6%) had teeth associated with pathological changes.
CONCLUSION
The incidence of pathological changes to the lower third molar was relatively low. Surgical extraction is recommended in cases of partially impacted teeth. In Korea, the incidence of asymptomatic third molar extraction was relatively higher than in European countries. More careful attention would be desirable to consider the risks and benefits of lower third molar extraction.

Keyword

Third molar; Indication; Extraction; Asymptomatic

MeSH Terms

Aged
Decision Making
Hand
Humans
Incidence
Korea
Mandibular Nerve
Molar, Third
Pericoronitis
Periodontitis
Risk Assessment
Surgery, Oral
Tooth
Tooth, Impacted

Reference

References

1. Atchison KA, Gironda MW, Black EE, Schweitzer S, Der-Martirosian C, Felsenfeld A, et al. Baseline characteristics and treatment preferences of oral surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65:2430–7.

2. Brickley M, Shepherd J, Mancini G. Comparison of clinical treatment decisions with US National Institutes of Health consensus indications for lower third molar removal. Br Dent J. 1993; 175:102–5.

3. Friedman JW. The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97:1554–9.

4. Tilley C, Mcintosh E, Bahrami M, Clarkson J, Deery C, Pitts N. An economic analysis of implementing the SIGN third molar guideline: implications for the design and analysis of implementation studies. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005; 10:143–9.

5. Song F, O'Meara S, Wilson P, Golder S, Kleijnen J. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylactic removal of wisdom teeth. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 4:1–55.

6. Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101:240–5.

7. Hinds EC, Frey KF. Hazards of retained third molars in older persons: report of 15 cases. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980; 101:246–50.

8. Laskin DM. Evaluation of the third molar problem. J Am Dent Assoc. 1971; 82:824–8.

9. Removal of third molars. Sponsored by the National Institute of Dental Research, November 28–30, 1979. Natl Inst Health Consens Dev Conf Summ. 1979; 2:65–8.

10. Kugelberg CF, Ahlstro ¨m U, Ericson S, Hugoson A. Periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A retrospective study. Int J Oral Surg. 1985; 14:29–40.

11. Sewerin I, von Wowern N. A radiographic four-year follow-up study of asymptomatic mandibular third molars in young adults. Int Dent J. 1990; 40:24–30.

12. Stanley HR, Alattar M, Collett WK, Stringfellow HRJ, Spiegel EH. Pathological sequelae of “neglected”impacted third molars. J Oral Pathol. 1988; 17:113–7.

13. Mercier P, Precious D. Risks and benefits of removal of impacted third molars. A critical review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 21:17–27.

14. Edwards MJ, Brickley MR, Goodey RD, Shepherd JP. The cost, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of removal and retention of asymptomatic, disease free third molars. Br Dent J. 1999; 187:380–4.

15. Knutsson K, Lysell L, Rohlin M. Dentists'decisions on prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars: a 10-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001; 29:308–14.

16. Knutsson K, Lysell L, Rohlin M, Brickley M, Shepherd JP. Comparison of decisions regarding prophylactic removal of mandibular third molars in Sweden and Wales. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:198–202.

17. Song F, Landes DP, Glenny AM, Sheldon TA. Prophylactic removal of impacted third molars: an assessment of published reviews. Br Dent J. 1997; 182:339–46.

18. Venta ¨ I, Ylipaavalniemi P, Turtola L. Long-term evaluation of estimates of need for third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58:288–91.

19. Elter JR, Offenbacher S, White RP, Beck JD. Third molars associated with periodontal pathology in older Americans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63:179–84.

20. White RP Jr, Madianos PN, Offenbacher S, Phillips C, Blakey GH, Haug RH, et al. Microbial complexes detected in the second/third molar region in patients with asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60:1234–40.

21. White RP Jr, Offenbacher S, Phillips C, Haug RH, Blakey GH, Marciani RD. Inflammatory mediators and periodontitis in patients with asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 60:1241–5.

22. Hanson BP, Cummings P, Rivara FP, John MT. The association of third molars with mandibular angle fractures: a metaanalysis. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004; 70:39–43.

23. Lee JT, Dodson TB. The effect of mandibular third molar presence and position on the risk of an angle fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 58:394–8.

24. Ma' aita J, Alwrikat A. Is the mandibular third molar a risk factor for mandibular angle fracture? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000; 89:143–6.

25. Zhu SJ, Choi BH, Kim HJ, Park WS, Huh JY, Jung JH, et al. Relationship between the presence of unerupted mandibular third molars and fractures of the mandibular condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34:382–5.

26. Iida S, Nomura K, Okura M, Kogo M. Influence of the incompletely erupted lower third molar on mandibular angle and condylar fractures. J Trauma. 2004; 57:613–7.

27. Patel V, Moore S, Sproat C. Coronectomy – oral surgery's answer to modern day conservative dentistry. Br Dent J;209:. 111–4.

28. Pogrel MA. Partial odontectomy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007; 19:85–91.

29. Dolanmaz D, Yildirim G, Isik K, Kucuk K, Ozturk A. A preferable technique for protecting the inferior alveolar nerve: coronectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:1234–8.

30. Bonetti GA, Parenti SI, Checchi L. Orthodontic extraction of mandibular third molar to avoid nerve injury and promote periodontal healing. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35:719–23.

31. Alessandri Bonetti G, Bendandi M, Laino L, Checchi V, Checchi L. Orthodontic extraction: riskless extraction of impacted lower third molars close to the mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65:2580–6.

32. Park W, Park JS, Kim YM, Yu HS, Kim KD. Orthodontic extrusion of the lower third molar with an orthodontic mini implant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod;110: e1–6.