J Nurs Acad Soc.  1985 Aug;15(2):62-67.

A Study on Relationship between the Personality and the Work Achievement of Nurses

• Park KE

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to investigates the desirable selection of nursing. The subjects for this study were made up of 144 R.N. in active service at H. University hospital in Seoul. This study was "Choice of nursing scale" as a tool which was MMPI questionnaire developed by Beaver(1953), and was consist of the choice of nursing scale made up to 66 items. The finding of this study related to their personality and their work achievement showed very significant differences : The results of this study are : 1. There was a significance of the difference between the responses of 64 student nurses and 64 College Women in Educations Curricular to Beaver score. (p<.001) 2. There was a significance in Beaver's score between high group(above 82) and low group(below 53) according to head nurses' work achievement score (p<.05) 3. This study had relationship between the personality and the work achievement of nurses. For the reason, I suggest that we had to apply to select the appropriate nurses in Health Field as Hospitals.

MeSH Terms

Female
Head
Humans
MMPI
Nursing
Surveys and Questionnaires
Rodentia
Seoul

Reference

1). 박병숙;한국간호교육의당면문제: 이화여자대학간호대학논문집, 1: 36, 1976.이영북;간호사, 수문사, 1981.

2). 한f 복: 간호원의성격특성에관한연구, 카를릭대학의학부논문집, 19: 368~369: 1970L.

3). 전산초;전인간호의임상학적분석과실행에관한연구, 간호학회지'4 (1): 1–21, 1974.

4). Effie J. Taylor; What is the nature of nursing, AJN, 347: 476: 1943.

5). 박정호;종합병원간호인력수요에관한소고, 대한병원협회지, 4 (10): 12~15, 1975.

6). M.A. May; Personality in nature society and culture, NY, ALF Pres, 63: 1932.

7). 강규숙: 정현숙;간호대학학생의학업성적예측에관한연干, 연세대학교는물지: 1: ²⁷여³⁹: 19 76.

8). Beaver A.P.; Personality factors in choice of nursing, J Appl Psyc, 37: 374~379, 1953.

9). ieaver A.P.; Psychometric data and survival in a collese of nursing, Psyc Reports. 2: 223–226, 195&.

10). 강경자;간호원에대한사회적인평가, 2 (1): 19 71.

11). 하영수.;4년재간호대학에관한조사연干, 대한간흐: 9: 2829, 1969.

12). 이귀향, 이영복: 간호사.회학, 수문사, 9– 10, 19 82.

41). 한국간호원워윤리강령: 대한간호협회제정공포.

15). 최정훈: 대학생학업성적에관한일반적성검사의예언타당도연구: 연세대학교인문과학연구소: 인물과학, 9: 162~163, 1963.

16). 최정r훈;화함성적타당도에관한추급연구: 연세대학교인불과학연구소.: 인품과학, U: 1965.

17). 카축릭의대간호학과;병원사회에있어서의인간적: 계, 다한7 (2): 13~24, 1967.

18). 인환괄재론, 서울,.4명물화가, 13113?, 1966,.

19). Elwood, R.H.; The role of personality t확it in -seiestiag A.carrer tbe attree and the. college ssril, J. 4, 19~2β, 19있.

20). .

21). Kim Yeong Seep; Δfuture perspective for demands and supplies of Korean health care personnels in the year 2000, THE HANYAUNG JOURNAL OE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2: 39– 85, 1981.

22). 박동서: 한국행정론: 법문사, 307–309, 1981.

23). 방용자;간호원의근무성적예칙에관한연구: 카불리의대는문, 4 (3): 57–62, 1974.

24). 심경석: 성격哥성과학력간의상관적연구, 연세대학교교육대학초등교육행정전공, 석사학위는문: 1970.

25). John R. Thurster & Helen L. Brunclik; The relationship of personality to achievement in nursing educations, nursing research summer, 14 (3): 203~209, 1965.

26). 광매련: 간호업무평정, 대한간호, 13 (4): 23여24: 1974.

27). M.M. Reece; Personality characteristics & success in a nursing program, nursing research, 10: 172 -176, 1961.

28). 정현숙;간호원의근무성적예측변인의효울성에관한연구, 학회지: 7 (1): 112.120, 1977.

29). Maelow, Abraham: Motivation & Personality, Ν. Y. Hoper & Row, 484–485, 1SS4.