J Korean Acad Nurs Adm.  2010 Dec;16(4):475-487.

Usability and Accessibility Evaluation of South Korean and American Health-Related Websites for the Elderly

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nursing, Kyungwon University, Korea.
  • 2College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Korea. jiwoon-ko@uiowa.edu

Abstract

No abstract available.

Keyword

Health Web Site; Older Adults; Usability; Accessibility

MeSH Terms

Aged
Humans

Reference

1. Adams N, Stubbs D, Woods V. Psychological barriers to Internet usage among older adults in the UK. Med Inform Internet Med. 2005. 30(1):3–17.
Article
2. Becker SA. A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2004. 11(4):387–406.
Article
3. Bernard M, Liao C, Mills M. Determining the best online font for older adults. 2001. Retrieved September 5, 2010. from http://www.surl.org/usabilitynews/31/fontSR.asp.
4. Center for Medical Education. Creating Senior-Friendly Web Sites. 2000. Retrieved April 15, 2006. from http://www.medicareed.org/PublicationFiles/V1N4.pdf.
5. Chisnell D, Redish JG. Designing web sites for older adults: A review of recent research. 2004. Retrieved October 15, 2010. from http://assets.aarp.org/www.aarp.org_/articles/research/oww/AARP-LitReview2004.pdf.
6. Czaja SJ, Sharit J. Ability-performance relationships as a function of age and task experience for a data entry task. J Exp Psychol Appl. 1998. 4(4):332–351.
Article
7. Davis LM, Lafrado LJ. Addressing senior needs in the accessibility of Internet health-related information. J Hosp Librariansh. 2003. 3(1):7–14.
Article
8. Department of Welfare for Seniors Seoul City Government. 2010 survey on the needs of senior citizens living in Seoul. 2010. Retrieved October 10, 2010. from http://spp.seoul.go.kr/silguk/9988_senior/info/policydata.jsp?searchType=ALL&searchWord=&list_start_date=&list_end_date=&pageSize=&branch_id=&branch_child_id=&pageNum=1&communityKey=B0776&boardId=10&act=VIEW.
9. Detlefsen EG. Where am I to go? Use of the Internet for consumer health information by two vulnerable communities. Libr Trends. 2004. 53(2):283–300.
10. Echt KV. Morrell RW, editor. Designing Web-based health information for older adults: Visual considerations and design directive. Older adults, Health Information, and the World Wide Web. 2002. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc;61–88.
11. Ellis RD, Kurniawan SH. Increasing the usability of online information for older users: A case study in participatory design. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2000. 12(2):263–276.
Article
12. Kelley CL, Morrell RW, Park DC, Mayhorn CB. Predictors of electronic bulletin board system use in older adults. Educ Gerontol. 1999. 25(1):19–35.
Article
13. Korea Communications Commission, & Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA). 2009 survey on the Internet usage. 2009. Seoul: KISA.
14. Korea National Statistical Office. Estimation of future population. 2006. Seoul: Korea National Statistical Office.
15. Kurniawan SH, Zaphiris P. Web health information architecture for older users. IT Soc. 2003. 1(3):42–63.
16. Kwon S, Kang S, Kang J, Chung K. Web accessibility for elders and physically or cognitively impaired citizens: A descriptive longitudinal analysis of government-related sites in the Republic of Korea. 2004. Seoul: Sookmyung Women's University, Applied Gerontology Graduate Program.
17. Morrell R, Mayhorn C, Bennett J. A survey of World Wide Web use in middle-aged and older adults. Hum Factors. 2000. 42(2):175–182.
Article
18. Nahm E, Preece J, Resnick B, Mills ME. Usability of health web sites for older adults. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004. 22(6):326–334.
Article
19. National Cancer Institute. Research-based web design and usability guideline. 2003. Retrieved September, 15, 2010. from http://www.usability.gov/guidelines/.
20. National Institute on Aging, & National Library of Medicine. Making your web sites senior friendly: A checklist. 2002. Retrieved September 5, 2010. from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/checklist.pdf.
21. Nielson J. Usability for senior citizens. 2002. Retrieved November 27, 2010. from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/seniors.html.
22. Strong AJ, Walker N, Rogers WA. Rogers WA, Fisk AD, editors. Searching the World Wide Web: Can older adults get what they need? Human factors interventions for the health care of older adults. 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc;255–269.
23. Tullis TS, Boynton JL, Hersh H. Readability of fonts in the Windows Environments. CHI '95 Mosaic of Creativity. 1995. Retrieved September 20, 2010. from http://www.sigchi.org/chi95/proceedings/intpost/tst_bdy.htm.
24. U.S. Census Bureau. Internet use in the United States: October 2009. 2010. Retrieved September 20, 2010. from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer/2009.html.
25. Wagner L, Wagner T. The effect of age on the use of health and self-care information: confronting the stereotype. Gerontologist. 2003. 43(3):318–324.
Article
26. White H, McConnell E, Clipp E, Bynum L, Teague C, Navas L, et al. Surfing the net in later life: A review of the literature and pilot study of computer use and quality of life. J Appl Gerontol. 1999. 18(3):358–378.
Article
27. Xiao B, Lunsford R, Coulston R, Wesson M, Oviatt S. Modeling multimodal integration patterns and performance in senior: Toward adaptive processing of individual difference. Paper presented at the International Conference on Multimodal Interface. 2003. Vancouver, Canada.
Full Text Links
  • JKANA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr