Korean J Urol.  2010 Nov;51(11):783-787.

Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using Pneumatic Lithotripsy (Lithoclast(R)) Alone or in Combination with Ultrasonic Lithotripsy

• Cho CO
• Yu JH
• Sung LH
• Chung JY
• Noh CH

Abstract

PURPOSE
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the procedure of choice for treating large renal stones. Pneumatic lithotripsy (Lithoclast(R)) is effective regardless of the stones' composition, and ultrasonic lithotripsy allows the aspiration of small debris during lithotripsy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of PCNL via Lithoclast(R) alone or combined with ultrasonic lithotripsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Thirty-five (group A) and 39 (group B) patients underwent Lithoclast(R) PCNL and combination therapy, respectively, from May 2001 to March 2010, and the two groups were compared in terms of stone size, location, and composition; operative time; average number of treatments; hospital days; hemoglobin loss; ancillary procedures; rate of device failure; and initial and total stone-free rates.
RESULTS
The two groups did not differ significantly in preoperative stone size, location, or composition; the average number of treatments; or the initial and overall stone-free rates. However, combination therapy was associated with a significantly lower operative time (181+/-50 vs. 221+/-65 min, respectively, p=0.004), number of hospital days (11.6+/-3.8 vs. 14.2+/-4.4 days, respectively, p=0.009), and average hemoglobin loss (1.12+/-0.61 vs. 1.39+/-1.02 g/dl, respectively, p=0.013). Transfusions were required in 6 patients (4 and 2 in each group, respectively), but there were no significant complications related to percutaneous access. There were 2 (5.7%) mechanical failures (Lithoclast(R) probe fracture) in the group A and 5 (12.8%) in the group B (2 cases of suction tube obstruction, 3 cases of overheating).
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of ultrasonic lithotripter and Lithoclast(R) is more effective than Lithoclast(R) alone because it significantly decreases operative time, hemoglobin loss, and the hospital stay. This may reflect the superior power of Lithoclast(R) and the ability to aspirate the debris during ultrasonic lithotripsy.

Keyword

Kidney calculi; Lithotripsy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

MeSH Terms

Hemoglobins
Humans
Kidney Calculi
Length of Stay
Lithotripsy
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous
Operative Time
Suction
Ultrasonics
Hemoglobins

Reference

1. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976. 10:257–259.

2. Marguet CG, Springhart WP, Tan YH, Patel A, Undre S, Albala DM, et al. Simultaneous combined use of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy to reduce the number of access tracts in the management of complex renal calculi. BJU Int. 2005. 96:1097–1100.

3. Begun FP. Modes of intracorporeal lithotripsy: ultrasound versus electrohydraulic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy. Semin Urol. 1994. 12:39–50.

4. Brannen GE, Bush WH, Correa RJ, Gibbons RP, Elder JS. Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy. J Urol. 1985. 133:6–12.

5. Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Srivastava A, Mandhani A. Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int. 2002. 90:809–813.

6. Davidoff R, Bellman GC. Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidence of renal hemorrhage. J Urol. 1997. 157:1229–1231.

7. Park BH, Han YM, Kim YG. Comparison of the two-stage procedure with the one-stage procedure for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Korean J Urol. 2006. 47:512–516.

8. Raney AM, Handler J. Electrohydraulic nephrolithotripsy. Urology. 1975. 6:439–442.

9. Hofbauer J, Höbarth K, Marberger M. Electrohydraulic versus pneumatic disintegration in the treatment of ureteral stones: a randomized, prospective trial. J Urol. 1995. 153:623–625.

10. Yiu MK, Liu PL, Yiu TF, Chan AY. Clinical experience with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. Lasers Surg Med. 1996. 19:103–106.

11. Jou YC, Shen CH, Cheng MC, Lin CT, Chen PC. High-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for percutaneous treatment of large renal stones. Urology. 2007. 69:22–25.

12. Teichman JM, Vassar GJ, Bishoff JT, Bellman GC. Holmium:YAG lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol. 1998. 159:17–23.

13. Michel MS, Honeck P, Alken P. New endourologic technology for simultaneous holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy and fragment evacuation for PCNL: ex-vivo comparison to standard ultrasonic lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2008. 22:1537–1539.

14. Piergiovanni M, Desgrandchamps F, Cochand-Priollet B, Janssen T, Colomer S, Teillac P, et al. Ureteral and bladder lesions after ballistic, ultrasonic, electrohydraulic, or laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 1994. 8:293–299.

15. Hofmann R, Pickl U, Hartung R. The Lithoclast and Lithoclast Master - an experimental and clinical comparison. J Endourol. 1996. 10:S119.

16. Hofmann R, Pickl U, Schwarzer JU, Hartung R. Mechanical vs. laser lithotripsy for ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1994. 151:203A.

17. Begun FP. Modes of intracorporeal lithotripsy: ultrasound versus electrohydraulic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy. Semin Urol. 1994. 12:39–50.

18. Fuchs GJ. Ultrasonic lithotripsy in the ureter. Urol Clin North Am. 1988. 15:347–359.

19. Hofmann R, Olbert P, Weber J, Wille S, Varga Z. Clinical experience with a new ultrasonic and LithoClast combination for percutaneous litholapaxy. BJU Int. 2002. 90:16–19.

20. Lehman DS, Hruby GW, Phillips C, Venkatesh R, Best S, Monga M, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2008. 22:285–289.

21. Auge BK, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK, Zhong P, Preminger GM. In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Urology. 2002. 60:28–32.

22. Hofmann R, Weber J, Heidenreich A, Varga Z, Olbert P. Experimental studies and first clinical experience with a new Lithoclast and ultrasound combination for lithotripsy. Eur Urol. 2002. 42:376–381.