Nutr Res Pract.  2010 Oct;4(5):428-432.

Korean consumers' perceptions of health/functional food claims according to the strength of scientific evidence

• Kim JY
• Kang EJ
• Kwon O
• Kim GH

Abstract

In this study, we investigated that consumers could differentiate between levels of claims and clarify how a visual aid influences consumer understanding of the different claim levels. We interviewed 2,000 consumers in 13 shopping malls on their perception of and confidence in different levels of health claims using seven point scales. The average confidence scores given by participants were 4.17 for the probable level and 4.07 for the possible level; the score for the probable level was significantly higher than that for the possible level (P < 0.05). Scores for confidence in claims after reading labels with and without a visual aid were 5.27 and 4.43, respectively; the score for labeling with a visual aid was significantly higher than for labeling without a visual aid (P < 0.01). Our results provide compelling evidence that providing health claims with qualifying language differentiating levels of scientific evidence can help consumers understand the strength of scientific evidence behind those claims. Moreover, when a visual aid was included, consumers perceived the scientific levels more clearly and had greater confidence in their meanings than when a visual aid was not included. Although this result suggests that consumers react differently to different claim levels, it is not yet clear whether consumers understand the variations in the degree of scientific support.

Keyword

Consumer confidence; consumer perception; health claim; level of scientific evidence; qualifying language

MeSH Terms

Audiovisual Aids
Weights and Measures

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Hypothetical product label used in this survey

Reference

1. Leathwood PD, Richardson DP, Strater P, Todd PM, van Trijp HC. Consumer understanding of nutrition and health claims: sources of evidence. Br J Nutr. 2007. 98:474–484.

2. Korea Ministry of Health and Welfare. Health/Functional Food Act. 2004. Seoul:

3. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Regulation on the advertizing and labeling of health claims for health/functional hoods. 2004. Seoul:

4. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Regulation on the health/functional foods labeling. 2008. Seoul:

5. Korea Food and Drug Administration. Regulation on the premarket approvals of new functional ingredients. 2009. Seoul:

6. World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activities, and health. 2004. Geneva:

7. Hooker NH, Teratanavat R. Dissecting qualified health claims: evidence from experimental studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008. 48:160–175.

8. Letter to commission of food and drugs, U.S. food and drug administration. Consumer Federation of America [Internet]. 2003. cited 2010 October 18. Available from: http://www.consumerfed.org/releases2.cfm?filename=122702nutrition_study.txt.

9. FDA sued over health claims on food labels-consumer groups say unproven health claims will mislead consumers. Consumer for Science in the Public Interest [Internet]. 2003. cited 2010 October 18. Available from: http://www.cspinet.org/new/200309251.html.

10. Williams P. Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods. Nutr Rev. 2005. 63:256–264.

11. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Food labeling issues: quantitative research with consumers. Evaluation report series No. 4. 2003. Canberra:

12. Murphy RD. Working paper No. 277. Consumer perceptions of qualified health claims in advertising. 2005. Washington D.C: Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission.

13. Singer L, Williams P, Ridges L, Murray S, McMahon A. Consumer reactions to different health claim formats on food labels. Food Aust. 2006. 58:92–97.

14. van Kleef E, van Trijp C, Luning P, Jongen W. Consumeroriented functional food developments: how well do functional disciplines reflect the 'voice of the consumer'? Trends Food Sci Technol. 2002. 13:93–101.

15. van Kleef E, van Trijp H, Luning P. Functional foods: health claims-food product compatibility and the impact of health claim framing on consumer evaluation. Appetite. 2005. 44:299–308.

16. Bech-Larsen T, Grunert KG. The perceived healthiness of functional foods. A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumer's perceptions of functional foods. Appetite. 2003. 40:9–14.

17. Sabbe S, Verbeke W, Deliza R, Matta V, Van Damme P. Effect of a health claim and personal characteristics on consumer acceptance of fruit juices with different concentrations of acai (Euterpe olerace Mart.). Appetite. 2009. 53:84–92.

18. Williams P, Ridges L, Batterham M, Ripper B, Hung MC. Australian consumer attitudes to health claim - food product compatibility for functional foods. Food Policy. 2008. 33:640–643.

19. Derby BM, Levy AS. Working paper No. 1 center for food safety and applied nutrition. Effects of strength of science disclaimers on the communication impacts of health claims. 2005. Maryland: FDA.