Korean J Urol.  1999 Apr;40(4):423-427.

Comparison of Simultaneous with Sequential Procedure in Bilateral Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the advantages of simultaneous procedure in bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of bilateral renal stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The charts of patients with bilateral renal stones from January 1990 to April 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. We compared operative time, hospital stay, decrease in hemoglobin, and complications of simultaneous procedure with those of sequential procedure.
RESULTS
Among the 13 patients with bilateral renal stones treated percutaneously, 9 patients were underwent simultaneous procedure and 4 patients were underwent sequential procedure. Mean operative time was 190 minutes in simultaneous group and 335 minutes in sequential group (p<0.05), mean hospital stay was 10.1 and 16.8 days (p<0.05) and mean decrease in hemoglobin was 2.6 and 1.6g/dl (p>0.05), respectively. Complications included blood loss requiring transfusion in 1 case and paralytic ileus in 1 of simultaneous group, and blood loss in 2 and fever in 1 of sequential group.
CONCLUSIONS
Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a well-tolerated, safe, expeditious, and cost-effective approach to patients with bilateral renal stones at centers proficient in percutaneous techniques.

Keyword

Bilateral; Renal stone; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Simultaneous

MeSH Terms

Fever
Humans
Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction
Length of Stay
Nephrostomy, Percutaneous*
Operative Time
Retrospective Studies
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr