Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2013 Jun;6(2):90-93.

Coblation vs. Electrocautery Tonsillectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Clinical Outcomes in Adolescents and Adults

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. diakonos@korea.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
Coblation is operated in low temperature, so it is proposed that tonsillectomy with coblation involves less postoperative pain and allows accelerated healing of the tonsillar fossae compared with other methods involving heat driven processes. However, the results of the previous studies showed that the effect of coblation tonsillectomy has been equivocal in terms of postoperative pain and hemorrhage. Though, most of the previous studies which evaluated coblation tonsillectomy were performed in children. Recently, electrocautery tonsillectomy has been used most widely because of the reduced intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time compared to other techniques. This prospective study compared intraoperative records and postoperative clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults following coblation and electrocautery tonsillectomies.
METHODS
Eighty patients over 16 years of age with histories of recurrent tonsillitis were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into coblation (n=40) and electrocautery tonsillectomy groups (n=40). All operations were performed by one surgeon who was skilled in both surgical techniques. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were checked.
RESULTS
Postoperative pain and otalgia were not significantly different between the two groups; however, there was a tendency towards reduced pain and otalgia in the coblation group. More cotton balls for swabbing the operative field were used introoperatively in the electrocautery group (P=0.00). There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage, wound healing, commencement of a regular diet, and foreign body sensation between the groups.
CONCLUSION
Only cotton use, which represented the amount of blood loss, was less in the coblation tonsillectomy group. Coblation tonsillectomy warrants further study with respect to the decreased postoperative pain and otalgia.

Keyword

Coblation; Electrocautery; Tonsillectomy

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Child
Diet
Earache
Electrocoagulation
Foreign Bodies
Hemorrhage
Hot Temperature
Humans
Operative Time
Pain, Postoperative
Palatine Tonsil
Postoperative Hemorrhage
Prospective Studies
Sensation
Tonsillectomy
Tonsillitis
Wound Healing

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Postoperative visual analoge scale (VAS) pain scores. No significant difference was evident between the coblator and electrocautery groups; however, there was a tendency towards less pain in the coblation group. P-values at postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, 2, 7, and 14 are 0.31, 0.99, 0.59, 0.19, and 0.41 each.

  • Fig. 2 Postoperative number of patients with otalgia. A tendency towards less otalgia was evident in the coblation group. P-values at postoperative day (POD) 0, 1, 2, 7, and 14 are 0.42, 1.00, 0.79, 0.81, and 0.46 each.


Reference

1. Belloso A, Chidambaram A, Morar P, Timms MS. Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: postoperative hemorrhage. Laryngoscope. 2003; 11. 113(11):2010–2013. PMID: 14603065.
Article
2. Plant RL. Radiofrequency treatment of tonsillar hypertrophy. Laryngoscope. 2002; 8. 112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100):20–22. PMID: 12172233.
Article
3. Burton MJ, Doree C. Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 7. (3):CD004619. PMID: 17636769.
Article
4. Mitic S, Tvinnereim M, Lie E, Saltyte BJ. A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2007; 8. 32(4):261–267. PMID: 17651267.
Article
5. Parker D, Howe L, Unsworth V, Hilliam R. A randomised controlled trial to compare postoperative pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy using cold steel dissection with bipolar haemostasis versus coblation technique. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009; 6. 34(3):225–231. PMID: 19531171.
6. Curtin JM. The history of tonsil and adenoid surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1987; 5. 20(2):415–419. PMID: 3299218.
7. Maddern BR. Electrosurgery for tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope. 2002; 8. 112(8 Pt 2 Suppl 100):11–13. PMID: 12172230.
Article
8. Lowe D, van der Meulen J. National Prospective Tonsillectomy Audit. Tonsillectomy technique as a risk factor for postoperative haemorrhage. Lancet. 2004; 8. 364(9435):697–702. PMID: 15325834.
9. Shah UK, Dunham B. Coblation for tonsillectomy: an evidence-based review. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2007; 69(6):349–357. PMID: 18033972.
Article
10. Stoker KE, Don DM, Kang DR, Haupert MS, Magit A, Madgy DN. Pediatric total tonsillectomy using coblation compared to conventional electrosurgery: a prospective, controlled single-blind study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 6. 130(6):666–675. PMID: 15195050.
Article
11. Parsons SP, Cordes SR, Comer B. Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator, and electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 1. 134(1):106–113. PMID: 16399189.
Article
12. Polites N, Joniau S, Wabnitz D, Fassina R, Smythe C, Varley P, et al. Postoperative pain following coblation tonsillectomy: randomized clinical trial. ANZ J Surg. 2006; 4. 76(4):226–229. PMID: 16681537.
Article
13. Philpott CM, Wild DC, Mehta D, Daniel M, Banerjee AR. A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post-operative symptoms. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005; 4. 30(2):143–148. PMID: 15839866.
14. Shah UK, Galinkin J, Chiavacci R, Briggs M. Tonsillectomy by means of plasma-mediated ablation: prospective, randomized, blinded comparison with monopolar electrosurgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 6. 128(6):672–676. PMID: 12049562.
15. Friedman M, LoSavio P, Ibrahim H, Ramakrishnan V. Radiofrequency tonsil reduction: safety, morbidity, and efficacy. Laryngoscope. 2003; 5. 113(5):882–887. PMID: 12792327.
Article
16. Glade RS, Pearson SE, Zalzal GH, Choi SS. Coblation adenotonsillectomy: an improvement over electrocautery technique? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 5. 134(5):852–855. PMID: 16647547.
Article
17. Timms MS, Temple RH. Coblation tonsillectomy: a double blind randomized controlled study. J Laryngol Otol. 2002; 6. 116(6):450–452. PMID: 12385358.
Article
18. Chang KW. Randomized controlled trial of Coblation versus electrocautery tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 2. 132(2):273–280. PMID: 15692541.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr