Asian Spine J.  2014 Oct;8(5):591-598. 10.4184/asj.2014.8.5.591.

Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Two-Year Results with a Modular Interbody Device

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Orthopaedic Spinal Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Lynn.jackson9@gmail.com
  • 2Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany.
  • 3Colorado Comprehensive Spine Institute, Englewood, CO, USA.
  • 4Spine Center Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PURPOSE: To present radiographic outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) utilizing a modular interbody device. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Though multiple anterior lumbar interbody techniques have proven successful in promoting bony fusion, postoperative subsidence remains a frequently reported phenomenon.
METHODS
Forty-three consecutive patients underwent ALIF with (n=30) or without (n=11) supplemental instrumentation. Two patients underwent ALIF to treat failed posterior instrumented fusion. The primary outcome measure was presence of fusion as assessed by computed tomography. Secondary outcome measures were lordosis, intervertebral lordotic angle (ILA), disc height, subsidence, Bridwell fusion grade, technical complications and pain score. Interobserver reliability of radiographic outcome measures was calculated.
RESULTS
Forty-three patients underwent ALIF of 73 motion segments. ILA and disc height increased over baseline, and this persisted through final follow-up (p<0.01). Solid anterior interbody fusion was present in 71 of 73 motion segments (97%). The amount of new bone formation in the interbody space increased over serial imaging. Subsidence >4 mm occurred in 12% of patients. There were eight surgical complications (19%): one major (reoperation for nonunion/progressive subsidence) and seven minor (five subsidence, two malposition).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of a modular interbody device for ALIF resulted in a high rate of radiographic fusion and a low rate of subsidence. The large endplate and modular design of the device may contribute to a low rate of subsidence as well as maintenance of ILA and lordosis. Previously reported quantitative radiographic outcome measures were found to be more reliable than qualitative or categorical measures.

Keyword

Lumbar spine; Low back pain; Interbody cage

MeSH Terms

Animals
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lordosis
Low Back Pain
Osteogenesis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Retrospective Studies
Full Text Links
  • ASJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr