J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2015 Aug;56(8):1170-1180. 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.8.1170.

Clinical Outcomes of Combined Photorefractive Keratectomy and Cataract Surgery in Patients with Granular Corneal Dystrophy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Kmk9@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of combined photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and cataract surgery in granular corneal dystrophy (GCD) patients with corneal stromal haziness compromising vision and cataract and clinically significant lens opacity.
METHODS
Medical records of 12 eyes that underwent PRK and cataract surgery between August 2009 and November 2013 in patients with GCD and cataracts were retrospectively evaluated. All PRKs were performed with the VISX S4 IR (VISX, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The double K SRK-T formula or double K Hoffer Q formula and postoperative corrected K were utilized to determine the intraocular lens power in patients with prior PRK. Postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, presence of the central island using topography analysis and recurrence of corneal opacity after combined PRK and cataract surgery were evaluated.
RESULTS
In all eyes, the PRK was successful and 3 eyes showed recurrence of corneal opacities without visual impairment during a mean follow-up of 36.6 months. The mean BCVA improved with an average increase of 4.63 lines (minimum 1 line, maximum 9 lines) and no patient showed any BCVA loss. Final spherical equivalent was -0.56 diopter (D) and the corneal central island was reported in only 1 eye. The Maloney method using the double-K formula with the SRK/T formula showed the lowest absolute error of 0.33 +/- 0.25 D.
CONCLUSIONS
Combined PRK and cataract surgery are effective methods for improving BCVA if patients with GCD have both visually significant diffuse corneal haze and clinically significant lens opacity.

Keyword

Avellino corneal dystrophy; Cataract; Granular corneal dystrophy; Photorefractive keratectomy

MeSH Terms

Cataract*
Corneal Opacity
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lenses, Intraocular
Medical Records
Photorefractive Keratectomy*
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Vision Disorders
Visual Acuity

Figure

  • Figure 1. Anterior segment photos of delayed wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in a granular corneal dystrophy patient. Slit lamp examination revealed diffuse corneal punctate epithelial erosion (A, D) 10 days after PRK. After applying bandage contact lens, the punctate epithelial erosion much decreased but irregular corneal surface remained (B, E) 1 month after PRK. Using topical fluorometholone 0.1%, antibiotics and artificial tears, corneal surface smoothing (C, F) occurred after 4 months.

  • Figure 2. (A, B, C) The preoperative anterior segment photography. (D, E, F) The postoperative anterior segment photography at day 3. (G, H, I) The postoperative 36-month anterior segment photography. (I) The anterior segment photography showing corneal opacity recurrence (white arrows) after laser surgery. This recurred cornea opacity did not affect the patients’ visual acuity.

  • Figure 3. Representative (A) pre- and (B) post-operative photorefractive keratectomy photographs of the eye which showed central island postoperatively. Axial curvature maps after photorefractive keratectomy surgery (C) shows the central island 1 month after surgery. The topography (D) shows decrease of the central island postoperative 35 months. K = keratometry.


Reference

References

1. Klintworth GK. Advances in the molecular genetics of corneal dystrophies. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 128:747–54.
Article
2. Ferry AP, Benson WH, Weinberg RS. Combined granular-lattice ('Avellino') corneal dystrophy. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 95:61–77.
3. Lee JH, Cristol SM, Kim WC. . Prevalence of granular corneal dystrophy type 2 (Avellino corneal dystrophy) in the Korean population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010; 17:160–5.
Article
4. Rapuano CJ. Excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1996; 36:127–36.
Article
5. Inoue T, Watanabe H, Yamamoto S. . Recurrence of corneal dystrophy resulting from an R124H Big-h3 mutation after photo-therapeutic keratectomy. Cornea. 2002; 21:570–3.
Article
6. Lee JH, Stulting RD, Lee DH. . Exacerbation of granular cor-neal dystrophy type II (Avellino corneal dystrophy) after LASEK. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:39–45.
Article
7. Yi JH, Ha BJ, Kim SW. . The number of cases, cause and treat-ment of avellino corneal dystrophy exacerbated after LASIK. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 49:1415–24.
Article
8. Kim EK. PTK in corneal dystrophy. Cornea. 2004; 23:323–4.
Article
9. Reddy JC, Rapuano CJ, Nagra PK, Hammersmith KM. Excimer la-ser phototherapeutic keratectomy in eyes with corneal stromal dys-trophies with and without a corneal graft. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 155:1111–8.e2.
Article
10. Jung SH, Han KE, Stulting RD. . Phototherapeutic keratec-tomy in diffuse stromal haze in granular corneal dystrophy type 2. Cornea. 2013; 32:296–300.
Article
11. Ishikawa T, Hirano A, Inoue J. . Trial for new intraocular lens power calculation following phototherapeutic keratectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44:400–6.
Article
12. Ishikawa T, Hirano A, Murai K. . Intraocular lens calculation for cataract treated with photorefractive keratectomy using ray tracing mathod. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44:575.
13. Jung SH, Han KE, Sgrignoli B. . Intraocular lens power calcu-lations for cataract surgery after phototherapeutic keratectomy in granular corneal dystrophy type 2. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:714–24.
Article
14. Hong JP, Kim TI, Chung JL. . Analysis of deposit depth and morphology in granular corneal dystrophy type 2 using fourier do-main optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2011; 30:729–38.
Article
15. Lee WB, Himmel KS, Hamilton SM. . Excimer laser ex-acerbation of Avellino corneal dystrophy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:133–8.
Article
16. Awwad ST, Di Pascuale MA, Hogan RN. . Avellino corneal dystrophy worsening after laser in situ keratomileusis: further clin-icopathologic observations and proposed pathogenesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145:656–61.
Article
17. Walter KA, Gagnon MR, Hoopes PC Jr, Dickinson PJ. Accurate in-traocular lens power calculation after myopic laser in situ kerato-mileusis, bypassing corneal power. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:425–9.
Article
18. Masket S, Masket SE. Simple regression formula for intraocular lens power adjustment in eyes requiring cataract surgery after ex-cimer laser photoablation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:430–4.
Article
19. Holladay JT, Hill WE, Steinmueller A. Corneal power measure-ments using scheimpflug imaging in eyes with prior corneal re-fractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:862–8.
Article
20. Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes after re-fractive keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1995; 11:490–3.
Article
21. Feiz V, Mannis MJ, Garcia-Ferrer F. . Intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and hyper-opia: a standardized approach. Cornea. 2001; 20:792–7.
22. Wang L, Booth MA, Koch DD. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:1825–31.
Article
23. Shammas HJ, Shammas MC. No-history method of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:31–6.
Article
24. Wang L, Hill WE, Koch DD. Evaluation of intraocular lens power prediction methods using the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons Post-Keratorefractive Intraocular Lens Power Calculator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:1466–73.
Article
25. Lee MO, Chung TY, Chung ES, Kee CW. Comparison of intra-ocular lens power calculation methods for cataract surgery after re-fractive surgery: a retrospective surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:180–7.
Article
26. Yun YJ, Kwang JY, Choi SH. Intraocular lens power calculation using Haigis-L method after corneal refractive surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:664–9.
Article
27. Holladay JT. Consultations in refract surgery. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989; 5:202–3.
28. Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2000; 16:349–61.
Article
29. Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX. . Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photo-refractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:693–702.
Article
30. Speicher L. Intra-ocular lens calculation status after corneal re-fractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001; 12:17–29.
Article
31. Savini G, Barboni P, Zanini M. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic refractive surgery: theoretical comparison of different methods. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:1271–82.
32. Camellin M, Calossi A. A new formula for intraocular lens power calculation after refractive corneal surgery. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:187–99.
Article
33. Jarade EF, Tabbara KF. New formula for calculating intraocular lens power after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1711–15.
Article
34. Arce CG, Soriano ES, Weisenthal RW. . Calculation of intra-ocular lens power using Orbscan II quantitative area topography after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:1061–74.
Article
35. Qazi MA, Cua IY, Roberts CJ, Pepose JS. Determining corneal power using Orbscan II videokeratography for intraocular lens cal-culation after excimer laser surgery for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:21–30.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr