J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2011 May;52(5):519-523. 10.3341/jkos.2011.52.5.519.

Learning Curve for Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. sjh@med.yu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To determine the learning curve of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) performed by a single oculoplastic surgeon after one year of fellowship training.
METHODS
This retrospective review study comprised nasolacrimal duct obstruction patients that underwent endonasal DCR at our hospital between February 2006 and February 2008. The patients that completed at least six months of follow-up were included in the analysis. Exclusion criteria were patients less than 20 years of age and NLD obstructions due to malignancy or canalicular obstructions. Success was defined as duct patency on syringing at the final follow-up and no complaints of epiphora.
RESULTS
Out of 161 eyes, the overall surgical success rate was 83.2% (134/161 eyes) and the mean postoperative follow-up period was 6.5 months (6-18 months). Success rates gradually increased as follows: 71.2% (37/52 eyes) for the first group, 88.7% (47/53 eyes) for the second group, and 89.3% (50/56 eyes) for the third group (second and third group compared to first group, p = 0.025, p = 0.017, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
To ensure high DCR success rates, the novice surgeon should perform at least 50 surgeries.

Keyword

Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy; Learning curve; Nasolacrimal duct obstruction

MeSH Terms

Dacryocystorhinostomy
Dietary Sucrose
Eye
Fellowships and Scholarships
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Learning
Learning Curve
Nasolacrimal Duct
Retrospective Studies
Dietary Sucrose

Figure

  • Figure 1. Success rates of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. * Chai-square test.

  • Figure 2. Comparison of cause of surgical failures.


Cited by  2 articles

Analysis of the Results Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy Related to Nasal Cavity State
Seung Kook Baek, Myung Sook Ha
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2014;55(5):633-639.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2014.55.5.633.

Learning Curve for Strabismus Surgery
Jang Hun Lee, Sang Beom Han, Seung Jun Lee, Moo Sang Kim
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015;56(7):1111-1116.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.7.1111.


Reference

References

1. Caldwell GW. Two new operations for obstructions of the nasal duct with preservation of the canaliculi. Am J Ophthalmol. 1893; 10:189.
2. Toti A. Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radiacalle delle sup-purazione cronicle del sacco lacrimale (dacriocistorinostomia). Clin Moderna. 1904; 10:385–9.
3. Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA, Awdry P. Functional endoscopic transnasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye. 1993; 7:545–9.
Article
4. Kao SC, Liao CL, Tseng JH, et al. Dacryocystorhinostomy with intraoperative mitomycin C. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:86–91.
Article
5. Zilelioğ lu G, Uğ urbaş SH, Anadolu Y, et al. Adjunctive use of mitomycin C on endoscopic lacrimal surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998; 82:63–6.
6. Lee SH, Chung WS. Long term surgical efficacy of endonasal dacryo cys torhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:307–13.
7. Ibrahim HA, Batterbury M, Banhegyi G, McGalliard J. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2001; 32:220–7.
Article
8. Malhotra R, Wright M, Olver JM. A consideration of the time taken to do dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery. Eye. 2003; 17:691–6.
Article
9. Tsirbas A, Davis G, Wormald PJ. Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 20:50–6.
Article
10. Woog JJ, Kennedy RH, Custer PL, et al. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:2369–77.
11. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135:76–83.
Article
12. Martin KR, Burton RL. The phacoemulsification learning curve: per-operative complications in the first 3000 cases of an experienced surgeon. Eye. 2000; 14:190–5.
Article
13. Tayanithi P, Pungpapong K, Siramput P. Vitreous loss during phacoemulsification learning curve performed by third-year residents. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005; 88:S89–93.
14. Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, et al. The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007; 125:1215–9.
Article
15. Rice DH. Endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy results in four patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990; 116:1061.
Article
16. Yoon JH, Kim KS, Jung DH, et al. Fontanelle and uncinate process in the lateral wall of the human nasal cavity. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110:281–5.
Article
17. Mannor GE, Millman AL. The prognostic value of preoperative dacryocystography in endoscopic intranasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992; 113:134–7.
Article
18. Dolman PJ. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:78–84.
Article
19. Kwon SW, Baek SH. Clinical evaluation of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2004; 45:1403–8.
20. Hartikainen J, Antila J, Varpula M, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108:1861–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr