J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2015 Feb;57(2):100-107. 10.3340/jkns.2015.57.2.100.

Minimally Invasive Option Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screw for Instability of Metastasis Involving Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Spine : A Case Series in a Single Center

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sobotta72@hotmail.com
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To report a minimally invasive treatment option using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with adjuvant treatment for metastatic thoraco-lumbar and lumbar spinal tumors.
METHODS
This is a retrospective study of charts of patients with spinal metastases. All were older than 18 years of age and were considered to have more than 3 months of life expectancy. The patients had single or two level lesions, and compression fracture or impending fracture. Exclusion criterion was metastasis showing severe epidural compression with definite neurological symptoms. Usually spinal segments from one level above to below pathology were stabilized. Visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain assessment and Frankel scale for neurological deficit were used, while pre- and post-operative performance status was evaluated using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).
RESULTS
Twelve patients (nine men, three women; median age 54.29 years) underwent surgery. All patients presented with back pain with/without radicular pain. There were no early complications and perioperative mortalities. Following surgery, a significant difference between average pre- and post-operative VAS scores was found (p=0.003). Overall, 91.8% of patients (11/12) experienced improvement in their ECOG score post-operatively. The mean ambulation time was 196.9 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 86.2-307.6 days; median, 97 days]. During follow-up, nine patients died and the mean overall survival time in enrolled twelve patients was 249.9 days (95% CI, 145.3-354.4 days; median, 176 days).
CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive treatment using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with adjuvant treatment is a good alternative treatment option for potential instability of the thoraco-lumbar and lumbar spinal metastasis.

Keyword

Spinal metastasis; Percutaneous; Pedicle screw; Minimally invasive; Surgery

MeSH Terms

Back Pain
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fractures, Compression
Humans
Life Expectancy
Male
Mortality
Neoplasm Metastasis*
Pain Measurement
Pathology
Retrospective Studies
Spine*
Visual Analog Scale
Walking

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A 57-year-old man with intractable back pain and radiculopathy due to spinal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. A and B : Preoperative plain X-ray and sagittal reconstruction lumbar spine computed tomography reveals an osteolytic lesion of L5 body and compression fracture. C and D : Preoperative axial and sagittal T2 weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging show metastatic tumor with mild epidural compression. E : Follow-up plain X-ray 6 month after percutaneous screw fixation and radiation theraphy shows no further vertebral collapse canal compromise. F and G : Follw-up axial and sagittal T2 weighted MR imaging show the improvement of epidural compression.

  • Fig. 2 Progression free survival (A) and overall survival (B) analysis. During follow-up, the mean ambulation time was 196.9±56.5 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 86.2-307.6 days; median, 97 days] and the mean overall survival time was 249.9±53.3 days (95% CI, 145.3-354.4 days; median, 176 days).


Cited by  1 articles

Bone Cement-Augmented Percutaneous Screw Fixation for Malignant Spinal Metastases: Is It Feasible?
Pius Kim, Seok Won Kim
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(2):189-194.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.0909.003.


Reference

1. Bailar JC 3rd, Gornik HL. Cancer undefeated. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336:1569–1574. PMID: 9164814.
Article
2. Bartels RH, Feuth T, van der Maazen R, Verbeek AL, Kappelle AC, André Grotenhuis J, et al. Development of a model with which to predict the life expectancy of patients with spinal epidural metastasis. Cancer. 2007; 110:2042–2049. PMID: 17853394.
Article
3. Cunha MV, Al-Omair A, Atenafu EG, Masucci GL, Letourneau D, Korol R, et al. Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) : analysis of predictive factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84:e343–e349. PMID: 22658511.
4. Di Martino A, Vincenzi B, Denaro L, Barnaba SA, Papalia R, Santini D, et al. 'Internal bracing' surgery in the management of solid tumor metastases of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Oncol Rep. 2009; 21:431–435. PMID: 19148519.
Article
5. Falicov A, Fisher CG, Sparkes J, Boyd MC, Wing PC, Dvorak MF. Impact of surgical intervention on quality of life in patients with spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31:2849–2856. PMID: 17108840.
Article
6. Fourney DR, Frangou EM, Ryken TC, Dipaola CP, Shaffrey CI, Berven SH, et al. Spinal instability neoplastic score : an analysis of reliability and validity from the spine oncology study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:3072–3077. PMID: 21709187.
Article
7. Gerszten PC, Monaco EA 3rd. Complete percutaneous treatment of vertebral body tumors causing spinal canal compromise using a transpedicular cavitation, cement augmentation, and radiosurgical technique. Neurosurg Focus. 2009; 27:E9. PMID: 19951062.
Article
8. Huang TJ, Hsu RW, Li YY, Cheng CC. Minimal access spinal surgery (MASS) in treating thoracic spine metastasis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31:1860–1863. PMID: 16845365.
Article
9. Ibrahim A, Crockard A, Antonietti P, Boriani S, Bünger C, Gasbarrini A, et al. Does spinal surgery improve the quality of life for those with extradural (spinal) osseous metastases? An international multicenter prospective observational study of 223 patients. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2007. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008; 8:271–278. PMID: 18312079.
Article
10. Kim CH, Chung CK, Sohn S, Lee S, Park SB. Less invasive palliative surgery for spinal metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2013; 108:499–503. PMID: 23982866.
Article
11. Le Huec JC, Lesprit E, Guibaud JP, Gangnet N, Aunoble S. Minimally invasive endoscopic approach to the cervicothoracic junction for vertebral metastases : report of two cases. Eur Spine J. 2001; 10:421–426. PMID: 11718197.
Article
12. Mobbs RJ, Nakaji P, Szkandera BJ, Teo C. Endoscopic assisted posterior decompression for spinal neoplasms. J Clin Neurosci. 2002; 9:437–439. PMID: 12217675.
Article
13. Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Regine WF, Payne R, Saris S, Kryscio RJ, et al. Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer : a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005; 366:643–648. PMID: 16112300.
Article
14. Rodríguez-Ruiz ME, San Miguel I, Gil-Bazo I, Perez-Gracia JL, Arbea L, Moreno-Jimenez M, et al. Pathological vertebral fracture after stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung metastases. Case report and literature review. Radiat Oncol. 2012; 7:50. PMID: 22455311.
Article
15. Schneider F, Greineck F, Clausen S, Mai S, Obertacke U, Reis T, et al. Development of a novel method for intraoperative radiotherapy during kyphoplasty for spinal metastases (Kypho-IORT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81:1114–1119. PMID: 20934272.
Article
16. Singh K, Samartzis D, Vaccaro AR, Andersson GB, An HS, Heller JG. Current concepts in the management of metastatic spinal disease. The role of minimally-invasive approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:434–442. PMID: 16567775.
17. Tancioni F, Navarria P, Pessina F, Marcheselli S, Rognone E, Mancosu P, et al. Early surgical experience with minimally invasive percutaneous approach for patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) to poor prognoses. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19:294–300. PMID: 21743979.
Article
18. Thomas KC, Nosyk B, Fisher CG, Dvorak M, Patchell RA, Regine WF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgery plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66:1212–1218. PMID: 17145536.
Article
19. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J. A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30:2186–2191. PMID: 16205345.
Article
20. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Murakami H, Demura S. Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors : improvement of the technique and its associated basic background. J Orthop Sci. 2006; 11:3–12. PMID: 16437342.
Article
21. Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorák J, Müntener M. Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22:1765–1772. PMID: 9259789.
Article
22. Yamashita T, Aota Y, Kushida K, Murayama H, Hiruma T, Takeyama M, et al. Changes in physical function after palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor : association of the revised Tokuhashi score with neurologic recovery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33:2341–2346. PMID: 18827700.
Article
23. Zairi F, Arikat A, Allaoui M, Marinho P, Assaker R. Minimally invasive decompression and stabilization for the management of thoracolumbar spine metastasis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 17:19–23. PMID: 22607222.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr