J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2009 Dec;44(6):619-626. 10.4055/jkoa.2009.44.6.619.

Transforaminal Selective Nerve Root Blocks for Treating Single Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: The Short-term Outcome and Efficiency

• Kim SB
• Jeon TS
• Park WK
• Jo SK
• Kim YS
• Hwang CM

• KMID: 2186288
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2009.44.6.619

Abstract

PURPOSE
We wanted to determine the clinic usefulness of selective nerve root block for treating lumbosacral radiculopathy that's due to a herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) or foraminal stenosis (FS) by analyzing the short-term results after the selective nerve root block (SNRB) procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients were investigated in our research. Sixty-five patients were divided into two groups: thirty-seven patients of group one were the HNP patients and twenty-eight patients of group two were the FS patients. The effect of SNRB treatment was assessed by the degree of radiating pain in lower legs with using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and patients' subjective satisfaction. The average overall follow-up period was eleven months: that of the first group was 13.5 months and that of the group was 7.6 months.
RESULTS
For the 65 patients, the average VAS was 7.8 before a SNRB procedure and this decreased to 2.9 and 3.4 after one to three SNRB procedures, respectively. For group one, the VAS was 7.4 before the procedure and it decreased to 3.3 at one month and 3.7 at three months after the procedure. For group two, the VAS was 8.3 before the SNRB procedure and this favorably changed to 2.3 at one month and 3.0 at three months after the procedure. An operation was carried out due to no response for 8 patients (12%) and due to aggravation for 4 patients (6%) after the SNRB procedures. Three patients (8%) of group one and two patients (11%) of group two obtained pain relief at one month and aggravation at three months, respectively. On comparing the two groups, a better treatment effect was observed for the FS group after one month (p=0.002) and three months (p=0.01). Complications related to the SNRB procedure haaves not been observed in both groups.
CONCLUSION
The SNRB procedure is a very effective and safe procedure, after the appearance of symptoms, as a non-operative treatment for single lumbosacral radiculopathy due to a herniated nucleus pulposus or foraminal stenosis. This treatment appears to be more effective for the FS group than for the HNP group and it should be considered before carrying out an operative treatment.

Keyword

Lumbosacral radiculopathy; Herniated nucleus pulposus; Foraminal stenosis; Selective nerve root block; Transforaminal steroid injection

MeSH Terms

Constriction, Pathologic
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Leg
Lifting
Radiculopathy

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 (A) Anteroposterior radiograph with contrast material within the right L5 sleeve. (B) Anteroposterior radiograph with contrast material within the right S1 sleeve.

Reference

1. Tadokoro K, Miyamoto H, Sumi M, Shimomura T. The prognosis of conservative treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of patients over 70 years of age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. 30:2458–2463.

2. Ng L, Chaudhary N, Sell P. The efficacy of corticosteroids in periradicular infiltration for chronic radicular pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. 30:857–862.

3. Saal JA, Saal JS. Nonoperative treatment of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc with radiculopathy An outcome study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989. 14:431–437.

4. Guigui P, Devyver B, Rillardon L, Ngounou P, Deburge A, Ghosez JP. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: prospective analysis of 872 patients. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2004. 90:5–15.

5. Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW, Booth RE Jr, Rothman RH, Pickens GT. The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985. 67:63–66.

6. Derby R, Kine G, Saal JA, et al. Response to steroid and duration of radicular pain as predictors of surgical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992. 17:Suppl. 176–183.

7. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997. 22:2128–2156.

8. Bogduk N. Epidural steroids. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995. 20:845–848.

9. Macnab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971. 53:891–903.

10. Narozny M, Zanetti M, Boos N. Therapeutic efficacy of selective nerve root blocks in the treatment of lumbar radicular leg pain. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001. 131:75–80.

11. Tajima T, Furukawa K, Kuramochi E. Selective lumbosacral radiculography and block. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1980. 5:68–77.

12. Hong YK, Sa SJ, Kim JD. Selective spinal nerve root block for the treatment of sciatica. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1997. 32:1056–1062.

13. Lee DH, Yang SH, Yang BR, Yi SR, Chung SW, Kim MS. The short term results of selective nerve root block in herniated lumbar disc patients. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2004. 11:216–222.

14. Shim DM, Kim TK, Song HH, You SS, Cho JD. The usefulness of selective spinal nerve root block. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2004. 11:48–54.

15. Shim DM, Park JY, Yang JH, Choi BS. Effectiveness of selective nerve root block on the need for surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2008. 43:413–419.

16. Vad VB, Bhat AL, Lutz GE, Cammisa F. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. 27:11–16.

17. Botwin KP, Gruber RD, Bouchlas CG, et al. Fluoroscopically guided lumbar transformational epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar stenosis: an outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002. 81:898–905.

18. Riew KD, Yin Y, Gilula L, et al. The effect of nerve-root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000. 82:1589–1593.

19. Shim DM, Kim TK, Chae SU, Kim SS, Kim YJ, Jeung UD. Long term results of the selective spinal nerve root block for the herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2003. 10:30–35.

20. Lutz GE, Vad VB, Wisneski RJ. Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998. 79:1362–1366.

21. Abdi S, Datta S, Trescot AM, et al. Epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2007. 10:185–212.

22. Weinstein SM, Herring SA, Derby R. Contemporary concepts in spine care. Epidural steroid injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995. 20:1842–1846.

23. Choi SJ, Song JS, Kim C. The use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict the clinical outcome of nonsurgical treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Korean J Radiol. 2007. 8:156–163.

24. Wildermuth S, Zanetti M, Duewell S, et al. Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. Radiology. 1998. 207:391–398.

25. Roles NC, Maudsley RH. Radial tunnel syndrome: resistant tennis elbow as a nerve entrapment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972. 54:499–508.

26. Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983. 8:131–140.

27. Olmarker K, Blomquist J, Stromberg J, Nannmark U, Thomsen P, Rydevik B. Inflammatogenic properties of nucleus pulposus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995. 20:665–669.

28. McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, Hudkins PG, Laros GS. The inflammatory effect of nucleus pulposus. A possible element in the pathogenesis of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987. 12:760–764.

29. Nygaard OP, Mellgren SI, Osterud B. The inflammatory properties of contained and noncontained lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997. 22:2484–2488.

30. Franson RC, Saal JS, Saal JA. Human disc phospholipase A2 is inflammatory. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992. 17:Suppl. 129–132.

31. Lee HM, Weinstein JN, Meller ST, Hayashi N, Spratt KF, Gebhart GF. The role of steroids and their effects on phospholipase A2. An animal model of radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998. 23:1191–1196.

32. Jinkins JR, Whittemore AR, Bradley WG. The anatomic basis of vertebrogenic pain and the autonomic syndrome associated with lumber dick extrusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989. 152:1277–1289.

33. Johansson A, Hao J, Sjölund B. Local corticosteroid application blocks transmission in normal nociceptive C-fibres. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990. 34:335–338.

34. Otani K, Arai I, Mao GP, Konno S, Olmarker K, Kikuchi S. Nucleus pulposus-induced nerve root injury: relationship between blood flow and motor nerve conduction velocity. Neurosurgery. 1999. 45:614–619.

35. DePalma MJ, Slipman CW. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with epidural steroid injections. Spine J. 2008. 8:45–55.

36. Pfirrmann CW, Oberholzer PA, Zanetti M, et al. Selective nerve root blocks for the treatment of sciatica: evaluation of injection site and effectiveness--a study with patients and cadavers. Radiology. 2001. 221:704–711.

37. Kraemer J, Ludwig J, Bickert U, Owczarek V, Traupe M. Lumbar epidural perineural injection: a new technique. Eur Spine J. 1997. 6:357–361.