J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2013 Dec;48(6):464-470. 10.4055/jkoa.2013.48.6.464.

Surgical Treatment of Congenital Hypoplasia of the Thumb

• Lee JS
• Ahn TY
• Lee TH
• Kim HT

• KMID: 2185281
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2013.48.6.464

Abstract

PURPOSE
We evaluated the results and complications of surgical treatment for congenital thumb abnormalities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between 2002 and 2011, nine thumbs were surgically treated (Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea). There were five males and four females. The mean age of patients at the time of operation was 4.7 years (seven patients were under five years old and two patients were over 10). Five cases of Blauth type V hypoplasia (aplasia) were treated by pollicization (using the Buck-Gramcko technique). Four cases of type I or II hypoplasia were treated by opponensplasty and tendon transfer (for extensor and abductor augmentation). The Mehta scoring system was used for analysis of outcomes.
RESULTS
Among nine cases, outcomes were good in five cases, fair in three cases, and poor in one case. Second operations were required due to muscle weakness and metacarpo-phalangeal joint subluxation in three cases of aplasia and one case of hypoplasia. In all cases, the range of active abduction of the thumb was more than 40degrees and pinch power was at least 40% of that on the normal side at the latest follow up.
CONCLUSION
Surgical reconstruction using pollicization and opponensplasty for congenital thumb aplasia and hypoplasia, with additional surgery for muscle weakness, provided good results both functionally and cosmetically.

Keyword

thumb; aplasia; hypoplasia; pollicization; opponensplasty

MeSH Terms

Busan
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Joints
Male
Muscle Weakness
Tendon Transfer
Thumb*

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 A 2-year-old girl (Case 4) had right thumb agenesis (A). She underwent pollicization using the Buck-Gramcko technique (B).

• 

  Figure 2 A 2-year-old boy (Case 9) had left thumb hypoplasia (A). He underwent opponensplasty using the flexor digitorum sublimus of the fourth finger along with abduction and extension augmentation using the palmaris longus and flexor carpi ulnaris. Two years after surgery, his pinch power had improved (B).

• 

  Figure 3 Thumb pinch lifting strength was measured by comparison of counterweights lifted on the affected and normal sides.

Reference

1. Verdan C. The reconstruction of the thumb. Surg Clin North Am. 1968; 48:1033–1061.

2. Blauth W. The hypoplastic thumb. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1967; 62:225–246.

3. Ashbaugh H, Gellman H. Congenital thumb deformities and associated syndromes. J Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20:1039–1044.

4. Riley SA, Burgess RC. Thumb hypoplasia. J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34:1564–1573.

5. Kleinman WB. Management of thumb hypoplasia. Hand Clin. 1990; 6:617–641.

6. Manske PR, McCarroll HR Jr, James M. Type III-A hypoplastic thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1995; 20:246–253.

7. Chung MS, Baek GH, Park YB, Yoo WJ. Oppeonensplasty in patients with nerve injury or congenital hypoplasia of thumb. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1997; 32:773–780.

8. Chung MS, Baek GH, Kim WJ, Kim JH, Nam WD, Shin JH. Pollicization of patients with more than Buck-Gramcko grade IV congenital hypoplasia of the thumb. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2000; 35:283–288.

9. Lee SK, Chung MS, Lee YH, et al. Functional results of pollicization for grade IV or V hypoplastic thumb - isolated hypoplastic thumb vs hypoplastic thumb associated with symphalangism and/or congenital radial clubhand -. J Korean Soc Surg Hand. 2005; 10:102–108.

10. Buck-Gramcko D. Congenital absence and hypoplasia of the thumb. In : Strickland JW, editor. The thumb. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;1994. p. 45–65.

11. Bunnell S. Opposition of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1938; 20:269–284.

12. Mehta R, Malaviya GN. Evaluation of the results of opponensplasty. J Hand Surg Br. 1996; 21:622–623.

13. Flatt AE. The care of congenital hand anomalies. St. Louis: Mosby;1977. p. 109–117.

14. Manske PR, Rotman MB, Dailey LA. Long-term functional results after pollicization for the congenitally deficient thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1992; 17:1064–1072.

15. Bayne LG, Klug MS. Long-term review of the surgical treatment of radial deficiencies. J Hand Surg Am. 1987; 12:169–179.

16. Manske PR, McCaroll HR Jr. Index finger pollicization for a congenitally absent or nonfunctioning thumb. J Hand Surg Am. 1985; 10:606–613.

17. Jung MS, Baek GH. Hand surgery. 1st ed. Seoul: Koonja;2005. p. 1434–1435.