J Korean Med Assoc.  2005 Nov;48(11):1041-4053. 10.5124/jkma.2005.48.11.1041.

Controversial Issues and Reforms in the Long-term Care Insurance Scheme

Affiliations
  • 1Incheon Sarang Hospital, Korea. lovehospital@korea.com

Abstract

Recently, The Ministry of Health and Welfare(MOHW) introduced a new bill called the Law of Personal Care for the Elderly People(LPCEP). The bill has several important problems. First, the bill of LPCEP contains no comprehensive care but only personal care. Basically, the elderly would be in need of comprehensive care because they are weakened or in ill-health and must always be provided with medical treatment and personal care. However, MOHW has reduced the basic concept of services for the elderly from comprehensive care to personal care. Second, the design of the longterm care insurance scheme is distorted. Principles of insurance are not adopted making eligibility equal to the burden of insurance contribution. In addition, the burden of the nation is insufficient compared with that of Japan. Third, medical longterm care facilities(LTCF) are no longer provided for the elderly. It is inadequate for the elderly to be provided only non-medical LTCF. Fourth, in the beginning, the National Health Insurance Corporation would manage the LTC system, but in the long run, local government should manage it. Fifth, the assessment of eligibility scale is not estimated by professional medical man power. Half of the estimation committee is composed of public officers who have no professional knowledge or skills in simulative demonstration of long-term care insurance. Sixth, care management of core man power for LTC is not designed to adequately supply for the elderly. A personal caregiver only would be supplied. Therefore, the bill has to be put on hold. In case of a revision, the bill, which is designed inappropriately, should be reformed fully.

Keyword

Bill; Long-term care; Comprehensive care; Personal care; Medical treatment

MeSH Terms

Aged
Caregivers
Humans
Insurance
Insurance, Long-Term Care*
Japan
Jurisprudence
Local Government
Long-Term Care*
National Health Programs

Figure

  • Figure 1

  • Figure 2


Reference

11. Evashwick C. The Continuum of Long-Term Care. An Integrated Systems Approach. 1996. New York: Delmar Publishers;4–11.
12. Quinn J. Successful Case Management in Long-Term Care. 1993. New York: Springer Publishing Company;5.
13. Kane RA. Long-Term Care: Principles, Programs and Policies. 1987. New York: Springer Publishing Company;341–344.
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr