Chonnam Med J.  2015 Dec;51(3):129-134. 10.4068/cmj.2015.51.3.129.

Posterior Cervical Microscopic Foraminotomy and Discectomy with Laser for Unilateral Radiculopathy

• Jeon HC
• Kim CS
• Kim SC
• Kim TH
• Jang JW
• Choi KY
• Moon BJ
• Lee JK

• KMID: 2172129
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2015.51.3.129

Abstract

Surgical decompression for cervical radiculopathy includes anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, anterior or posterior cervical foraminotomy, and cervical arthroplasty after decompression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a CO2 laser in posterior-approach surgery for unilateral cervical radiculopathy. From January 2006 to December 2008, 12 consecutive patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy from either foraminal stenosis or disc herniation, which was confirmed with imaging studies, underwent posterior foraminotomy and discectomy with the use of a microscope and CO2 laser. For annulotomy and discectomy, we used about 300 joules of CO2 laser energy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate the extent of disc removal or foraminal decompression. Clinical outcome was evaluated by using visual analogue scale scores for radicular pain and Odom's criteria. For evaluation of spinal stability, cervical flexion and extension radiographs were obtained. Single-level foraminotomy was performed in 10 patients and two-level foraminotomies were performed in 2 patients. Preoperative radicular symptoms were improved immediately after surgery in all patients. No surgery-related complications developed in our cases. Postoperative MRI demonstrated effective decompression of ventral lesions and widened foraminal spaces in all cases. There was no development of cervical instability during the follow-up period. Posterior foraminotomy and discectomy using a microscope and CO2 laser is an effective surgical tool for unilateral cervical radiculopathy caused by lateral or foraminal disc herniations or spondylotic stenosis. Long-term follow-up with radiographs showed no significant kyphotic changes or spinal instability.

Keyword

Discectomy; Lasers; Foraminotomy; Radiculopathy

MeSH Terms

Arthroplasty
Constriction, Pathologic
Decompression
Decompression, Surgical
Diskectomy*
Follow-Up Studies
Foraminotomy*
Humans
Lasers, Gas
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiculopathy*

Figure

• 

  FIG. 1 The clinical outcome according to the Odom's criteria. X: time on F/U, Y: number of patient.

• 

  FIG. 2 A patient with a C6-7 foraminal stenosis and disc herniation on the left side (patient 5); preoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing left foraminal stenosis with disc herniation on the C6-7 (A and B), postoperative MRI showing the state of left unilateral foraminal decompression with disc removal (C and D).

• 

  FIG. 3 Intraoperative microscopic view (patient 5); the state after foraminotomy (A), and the state after laser discectomy (B). C: central spinal cord, R: root, and D: protruding disc.

Reference

1. Jagannathan J, Sherman JH, Szabo T, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA. The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009; 10:347–356.

2. Hilibrand AS, Yoo JU, Carlson GD, Bohlman HH. The success of anterior cervical arthrodesis adjacent to a previous fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22:1574–1579.

3. Hilton DL Jr. Minimally invasive tubular access for posterior cervical foraminotomy with three-dimensional microscopic visualization and localization with anterior/posterior imaging. Spine J. 2007; 7:154–158.

4. Aldrich F. Posterolateral microdisectomy for cervical monoradiculopathy caused by posterolateral soft cervical disc sequestration. J Neurosurg. 1990; 72:370–377.

5. Cağlar YS, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, Tuna H, Bakir A, Torun F, et al. Keyhole approach for posterior cervical discectomy: experience on 84 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007; 50:7–11.

6. Lee DY, Lee SH. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser-assisted microdiscectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation at the L5-S1 level. Photomed Laser Surg. 2011; 29:531–535.

7. Jho HD. Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy for radiculopathy: a new approach to cervical disc herniation. J Neurosurg. 1996; 84:155–160.

8. Henderson CM, Hennessy RG, Shuey HM Jr, Shackelford EG. Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery. 1983; 13:504–512.

9. DePalma AF, Rothman RH, Lewinnek GE, Canale ST. Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1972; 134:755–758.

10. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33:940–948.

11. Coric D, Adamson T. Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic laminoforaminotomy. Neurosurg Focus. 2008; 25:E2.

12. Holly LT, Moftakhar P, Khoo LT, Wang JC, Shamie N. Minimally invasive 2-level posterior cervical foraminotomy: preliminary clinical results. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007; 20:20–24.

13. Hacker RJ, Miller CG. Failed anterior cervical foraminotomy. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98:2 Suppl. 126–130.

14. Hakuba A. Trans-unco-discal approach. A combined anterior and lateral approach to cervical discs. J Neurosurg. 1976; 45:284–291.

15. Verbiest H. A lateral approach to the cervical spine: technique and indications. J Neurosurg. 1968; 28:191–203.

16. Fessler RG, Khoo LT. Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: an initial clinical experience. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51:5 Suppl. S37–S45.

17. Williams RW. Microcervical foraminotomy. A surgical alternative for intractable radicular pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983; 8:708–716.

18. Woertgen C, Holzschuh M, Rothoerl RD, Haeusler E, Brawanski A. Prognostic factors of posterior cervical disc surgery: a prospective, consecutive study of 54 patients. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40:724–728. discussion 728-9

19. Hellinger J. Technical aspects of the percutaneous cervical and lumbar laser-disc-decompression and -nucleotomy. Neurol Res. 1999; 21:99–102.

20. Houck PM. Comparison of operating room lasers: uses, hazards, guidelines. Nurs Clin North Am. 2006; 41:193–218. vi

21. Nerubay J, Caspi I, Levinkopf M. Percutaneous carbon dioxide laser nucleolysis with 2- to 5-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (337):45–48.

22. Knight MT, Goswami A, Patko JT. Cervical percutaneous laser disc decompression: preliminary results of an ongoing prospective outcome study. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001; 19:3–8.

23. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Bhatti RA, Yeasting RA. The projection of the cervical disc and uncinate process on the posterior aspect of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol. 1999; 51:363–367.

24. Riew KD, Cheng I, Pimenta L, Taylor B. Posterior cervical spine surgery for radiculopathy. Neurosurgery. 2007; 60(1 Supp1 1):S57–S63.

25. Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, Pobereskin L. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93:2 Suppl. 199–204.

26. Baba H, Chen Q, Uchida K, Imura S, Morikawa S, Tomita K. Laminoplasty with foraminotomy for coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: a preliminary report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21:196–202.

27. Chen BH, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB. Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion. J Spinal Disord. 2001; 14:17–20.

28. Witzmann A, Hejazi N, Krasznai L. Posterior cervical for aminotomy. A follow-up study of 67 surgically treated patients with compressive radiculopathy. Neurosurg Rev. 2000; 23:213–217.

29. Zdeblick TA, Zou D, Warden KE, McCabe R, Kunz D, Vanderby R. Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74:22–27.