Healthc Inform Res.  2016 Apr;22(2):73-80. 10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.73.

Utilization and Content Evaluation of Mobile Applications for Pregnancy, Birth, and Child Care

• Lee Y
• Moon M

• KMID: 2166932
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.73

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to explore the use of mobile applications about pregnancy, birth, and child care among pregnant women and to review the characteristics, contents, and credibility of the applications used by these women.
METHODS
This study was cross-sectional and was conducted using a survey method. One hundred and ninety-three pregnant women participated in this study. The questionnaire was developed to examine the pattern and reasons for pregnancy-related application usage. The 47 mobile apps used by participants were reviewed and categorized based on functions and developers. The credibility of the information provided by the mobile applications was evaluated using a structured measurement.
RESULTS
Fifty-five percent of the participants were using mobile apps related to pregnancy, birth, and/or child care. First-time mothers used the apps significantly more often than women who were pregnant for the second time. Women who had used a smartphone for a longer period of time were more likely to use apps related to pregnancy, birth, and/or child care. The most frequently-used information concerned signs of risk and disease during pregnancy. Experts' quick opinions and Q&A formats related to diet and medication administration during pregnancy were the women's most cited need for content in applications. Information was the most common function of the apps. In the evaluation of information credibility, the 'information source' category had the lowest score.
CONCLUSIONS
The results showed that applications related to pregnancy, birth, and child care have become an important information source for pregnant women. To fulfill the needs of users, credible applications related to pregnancy, birth, and child care should be developed and managed by qualified healthcare professionals.

Keyword

Mobile Applications; Pregnant Women; Smartphone; Birth; Child Care

MeSH Terms

Child Care*
Child*
Delivery of Health Care
Diet
Female
Humans
Mobile Applications*
Mothers
Parturition*
Pregnancy*
Pregnant Women
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Mosa AS, Yoo I, Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:67.

2. Smith A. US smartphone use in 2015 [Internet]. Washington (DC): Pew Research Center;2015. cited at 2016 Jan 3. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/.

3. Baig MM, GholamHosseini H, Connolly MJ. Mobile healthcare applications: system design review, critical issues and challenges. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015; 38(1):23–38.

4. Greenspun H, Coughlin S. mHealth in an mWorld: how mobile technology is transforming health care. Washington (DC): Deloitte Center for Health Solutions;2012.

5. Gauntlett C, MacCarthy J, Tindall M, Buck S, Connery G. Patient apps for improved healthcare: from novelty to mainstream. Parsippany (NJ): IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics;2013.

6. Moore J. The benefits of mobile apps for patients and providers. Br J Healthc Manag. 2012; 18(9):465–467.

7. Kratzke C, Cox C. Smartphone technology and apps: rapidly changing health promotion. Int Electron J Health Educ. 2012; 15(1):72–82.

8. Hasman L. An introduction to consumer health apps for the iPhone. J Consum Health Internet. 2011; 15(4):322–329.

9. US Food and Drug Administration. Mobile medical applications [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration;2015. cited at 2015 Dec 22. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/digitalhealth/mobilemedicalapplications/default.htm.

10. Terry K. Number of health apps soars, but use does not always follow [Internet]. New York (NY): Medscape;2015. cited at 2015 Dec 22. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/851226.

11. Tripp N, Hainey K, Liu A, Poulton A, Peek M, Kim J, et al. An emerging model of maternity care: smartphone, midwife, doctor. Women Birth. 2014; 27(1):64–67.

12. Fleming SE, Vandermause R, Shaw M. First-time mothers preparing for birthing in an electronic world: internet and mobile phone technology. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2014; 32(3):240–253.

13. Robinson F, Jones C. Women's engagement with mobile device applications in pregnancy and childbirth. Pract Midwife. 2014; 17(1):23–25.

14. Waring ME, Moore Simas TA, Xiao RS, Lombardini LM, Allison JJ, Rosal MC, et al. Pregnant women's interest in a website or mobile application for healthy gestational weight gain. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014; 5(4):182–184.

15. Effron L. Pregnant? Use your smartphone: 12 best pregnancy apps [Internet]. New York (NY): abcnews.com;2013. cited at 2015 Dec 22. Available from: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/pregnant-smartphone-12-best-pregnancy-apps/story?id=18713241.

16. Good Daddy. Introduction for useful pregnancy, birth, and child care app [Internet]. Seoul: Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance;2015. cited at 2015 Dec 28. Available from: http://gooddaddy.samsungfire.com/1158.

17. Menoni T. Top 9 pregnancy apps for the iPhone and iPod touch [Internet]. place unknown: about.com;2014. cited at 2016 Jan 2. Available from: http://ipod.about.com/od/bestiphoneapps/tp/Pregnancy-Apps-For-Iphone-And-Ipod-Touch.htm.

18. Cummings E, Borycki EM, Roehrer E. Issues and considerations for healthcare consumers using mobile applications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 183:227–231.

19. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3(1):e27.

20. Kuehnhausen M, Frost VS. Trusting smartphone apps? To install or not to install, that is the question. In : Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA); 2013 Feb 25-28; San Diego, CA. p. 30–37.

21. Boulos MN, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R. How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online. 2011; 10:24.

22. Sama PR, Eapen ZJ, Weinfurt KP, Shah BR, Schulman KA. An evaluation of mobile health application tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014; 2(2):e19.

23. Woo YW, Cho KW. A model for evaluating confidence and satisfaction of health information web-sites. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2006; 6(9):42–49.

24. Citrix. Citrix data shows mobile subscriber behavior on wireless networks challenges user perceptions [Internet]. Santa Clara (CA): Citrix;2013. cited at 2015 Dec 27. Available from: https://www.citrix.com/news/announcements/feb-2013/citrix-data-shows-mobile-subscriberbehavior-on-wireless-network.html.

25. Research2guidance. Mobile health market report 2011–2016. . place unknown: research2guidance;2012.

26. Consumer Health Information Corporation. Motivating patients to use smartphone health apps [Internet]. McLean (VA): Consumer Health Information Corporation;2012. cited at 2015 Dec 22. Available from: http://www.consumer-health.com/motivating-patients-to-usesmartphone-health-apps/.

27. Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Guideline for mobile medical app safety management. . Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2013.

28. Airth-Kindree N, Vandenbark RT. Mobile applications in nursing education and practice. Nurse Educ. 2014; 39(4):166–169.