Korean J Urol.  2015 Aug;56(8):546-552. 10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.546.

Urologic robotic surgery in Korea: Past and present

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea. seraph@wonkwang.ac.kr

Abstract

Since 2005 when the da Vinci surgical system was approved as a medical device by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, 51 systems have been installed in 40 institutions as of May 2015. Although robotic surgery is not covered by the national health insurance service in Korea, it has been used in several urologic fields as a less invasive surgery. Since the first robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 2005, partial nephrectomy, radical cystectomy, pyeloplasty, and other urologic surgeries have been performed. The following should be considered to extend the indications for robotic surgery: training systems including accreditation, operative outcomes from follow-up results, and cost-effectiveness. In this review, the history and current status of robotic surgeries in Korea are presented.

Keyword

Korea; Nephrectomy; Prostatectomy; Robotics

MeSH Terms

Cystectomy/methods
History, 21st Century
Humans
Nephrectomy/methods
Prostatectomy/methods
Republic of Korea
Robotic Surgical Procedures/history/*methods
Urologic Surgical Procedures/history/*methods

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Number of robotic surgeries in Korea (data from Intuitive Surgical Korea Ltd.). RALPP, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty; RALRC, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy; RALRN, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy; RALPN, robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; RALRP, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

  • Fig. 2 Increasing situations of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy in Korea (data from Intuitive Surgical Korea Ltd.). RALPP, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty; RALPN, robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.


Cited by  3 articles

The comparison of surgical outcomes and learning curves of radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy and robotic system for cervical cancer: an experience of a single surgeon
Yoon Jung Heo, Seongmin Kim, Kyung Jin Min, Sanghoon Lee, Jin Hwa Hong, Jae Kwan Lee, Nak Woo Lee, Jae Yun Song
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018;61(4):468-476.    doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.468.

Changing Patterns of Primary Treatment in Korean Men with Prostate Cancer Over 10 Years: A Nationwide Population Based Study
Jinsung Park, Beomseok Suh, Dong Wook Shin, Jun Hyuk Hong, Hanjong Ahn
Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(3):899-906.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.212.

Anesthetic considerations for urologic surgeries
Chang-Hoon Koo, Jung-Hee Ryu
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020;73(2):92-102.    doi: 10.4097/kja.19437.


Reference

1. Thiel DD, Winfield HN. Robotics in urology: past, present, and future. J Endourol. 2008; 22:825–830.
2. Kong GS, Seong YK, Sung GT. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using da VinciTM Surgical robotic system: initial Korean experience. Korean J Urol. 2005; 46:353–359.
3. Lee YS, Han WK, Yang SC, Rha KH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol. 2006; 47:206–210.
4. Park SY, Kim HJ, Seo JW, Cho KS, Ham WS, Rha KH. Robotassisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol. 2008; 49:387–391.
5. Park SY, Cho KS, Park KK, Park SJ, Ham WS, Rha KH. Robotassisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion. Korean J Urol. 2008; 49:506–509.
6. Park SY, Cho KS, Ham WS, Lee JH, Choi HM, Rha KH. Robotassisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy with a bladder cuff excision. Korean J Urol. 2008; 49:373–375.
7. Kim SC, Kang T, Park H. Experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty, including robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Korean J Urol. 2009; 50:996–1002.
8. Kang SG, Choi H, Ko YH, Tae BS, Cho S, Ahn HJ, et al. Robotassisted laparoscopic distal ureterectomy and ureteral reimplantation. Korean J Urol. 2009; 50:921–924.
9. Kim DK, Lee JW, Park SY, Kim YT, Park HY, Lee TY. Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy in urachal diseases. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51:318–322.
10. You JY, Lee HY, Son GS, Lee JB, Bae JW, Kim HY. Comparison of robotic adrenalectomy with traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy with a lateral transperitoneal approach: a singlesurgeon experience. Int J Med Robot. 2013; 9:345–350.
11. Lee SH, Kim DS, Chang SG, Jeon SH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for stage IIIb mixed germ cell testicular cancer after chemotherapy. Korean J Urol. 2015; 56:540–544.
12. Koh JS, Cho KS. Initial experience of three cases of radical retropubic prostatectomy. Korean J Urol. 1989; 30:907–911.
13. Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B. Open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: The European and US experience. Rev Urol. 2010; 12:35–43.
14. Jang J, Cha SH, Kim DB, Kim JC, Hwang TK. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol. 2002; 43:342–345.
15. Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology. 2005; 66:5 Suppl. 105–107.
16. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001; 87:408–410.
17. Rha KH. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol. 2009; 50:97–104.
18. Seo DY, Cho HJ, Cho JM, Kang JY, Yoo TK. Experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a secondary training hospital: operation time, treatment outcomes, and complications with the accumulation of experience. Korean J Urol. 2013; 54:522–526.
19. Porpiglia F, Morra I, Lucci Chiarissi M, Manfredi M, Mele F, Grande S, et al. Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2013; 63:606–614.
20. Ploussard G, de la Taille A, Moulin M, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, et al. Comparisons of the perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus pure extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2014; 65:610–619.
21. Robertson C, Close A, Fraser C, Gurung T, Jia X, Sharma P, et al. Relative effectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2013; 112:798–812.
22. Vora AA, Marchalik D, Kowalczyk KJ, Nissim H, Bandi G, McGeagh KG, et al. Robotic-assisted prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy for locally-advanced prostate cancer: multi-institution comparison of oncologic outcomes. Prostate Int. 2013; 1:31–36.
23. Cho JW, Kim TH, Sung GT. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's experience. Korean J Urol. 2009; 50:1198–1202.
24. Ryu J, Kwon T, Kyung YS, Hong S, You D, Jeong IG, et al. Retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a comparative study of postoperative complications. Korean J Urol. 2013; 54:756–761.
25. Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Eur Urol. 2009; 55:1171–1178.
26. Park H, Byun SS, Kim HH, Lee SB, Kwon TG, Jeon SH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies in T1a renal cell carcinoma: a Korean multicenter experience. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51:467–471.
27. Hong HM, Seo IY, Rim JS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal arterial clamping. Korean J Urol. 2009; 50:1208–1212.
28. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Hillyer SP, Laydner H, Eyraud R, Panumatrassamee K, et al. Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience. J Urol. 2013; 189:1236–1242.
29. Seo IY, Choi H, Boldbaatr Y, Lee JW, Rim JS. Operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Korean J Urol. 2011; 52:279–283.
30. Jang HJ, Song W, Suh YS, Jeong US, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL nephrometry score of 7 or higher). Korean J Urol. 2014; 55:808–813.
31. Shin TY, Choi KH, Lim SK, Kim KH, Lee DH, Lee JY, et al. Simplified zero ischemia in robot assisted partial nephrectomy: initial Yonsei experience. Korean J Urol. 2013; 54:78–84.
32. Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015; 67:891–901.
33. Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, Bentas W, Probst M, Blaheta R, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol. 2003; 44:337–339.
34. Kang SC, Kang SG, Choi H, Ko YH, Lee JG, Kim JJ, et al. The feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: from the viewpoint of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Korean J Urol. 2009; 50:870–878.
35. Kwon SY, Kim BS, Kim TH, Yoo ES, Kwon TG. Initial experiences with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51:178–182.
36. Kang SG, Ko YH, Jang HA, Kim J, Kim SH, Cheon J, et al. Initial experience of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal urinary diversion: comparison with extracorporeal method. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012; 22:456–462.
37. Pyun JH, Kim HK, Kim JY, Kim SB, Cho S, Kang SG, et al. Standardized analysis of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Korea University Hospital experience. Korean J Urol. 2015; 56:48–55.
38. Zhao LC, Meeks JJ, Nadler RB. Robotics in urologic surgery. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2009; 61:331–339.
39. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001; 87:287–289.
40. Seo IY, Oh TH, Lee JW. Long-term follow-up results of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Korean J Urol. 2014; 55:656–659.
41. Erdeljan P, Caumartin Y, Warren J, Nguan C, Nott L, Luke PP, et al. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: follow-up of first Canadian experience with comparison of outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons. J Endourol. 2010; 24:1447–1450.
42. Oh TH. Current status of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urologic surgery. Korean J Urol. 2012; 53:443–450.
43. Seo IY, Rim JS. Laparoendoscopic Single-site pyelolithotomy with use of a carter-thomason needle grasper. Korean J Urol. 2013; 54:163–167.
44. Park SY, Rha KH, Autorino R, Derweesh I, Liastikos E, Tsai YC, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: outcomes of an international multi-institutional study of 101 patients. BJU Int. 2013; 112:610–615.
45. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Stein RJ. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int. 2009; 103:366–369.
46. Han WK, Kim DS, Jeon HG, Jeong W, Oh CK, Choi KH, et al. Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: partial nephrectomy for renal malignancy. Urology. 2011; 77:612–616.
47. Seo IY, Rim JS. Bilateral robotic single-site partial nephrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011; 21:435–438.
48. Komninos C, Tuliao P, Kim DK, Choi YD, Chung BH, Rha KH. Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site partial nephrectomy with the novel Da Vinci single-site platform: initial experience. Korean J Urol. 2014; 55:380–384.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr