J Korean Acad Nurs.  2015 Jun;45(3):323-328. 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.323.

Methodological Issues in Questionnaire Design

• Song Y
• Son YJ
• Oh D

• KMID: 2164373
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.323

Abstract

PURPOSE
The process of designing a questionnaire is complicated. Many questionnaires on nursing phenomena have been developed and used by nursing researchers. The purpose of this paper was to discuss questionnaire design and factors that should be considered when using existing scales.
METHODS
Methodological issues were discussed, such as factors in the design of questions, steps in developing questionnaires, wording and formatting methods for items, and administrations methods. How to use existing scales, how to facilitate cultural adaptation, and how to prevent socially desirable responding were discussed. Moreover, the triangulation method in questionnaire development was introduced.
RESULTS
Steps were recommended for designing questions such as appropriately operationalizing key concepts for the target population, clearly formatting response options, generating items and confirming final items through face or content validity, sufficiently piloting the questionnaire using item analysis, demonstrating reliability and validity, finalizing the scale, and training the administrator. Psychometric properties and cultural equivalence should be evaluated prior to administration when using an existing questionnaire and performing cultural adaptation.
CONCLUSION
In the context of well-defined nursing phenomena, logical and systematic methods will contribute to the development of simple and precise questionnaires.

Keyword

Questionnaire; Design; Cultural; Nursing research

MeSH Terms

Humans
Nursing Research
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
*Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Colosi L. Designing an effective questionnaire [Internet]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University;2006. cited 2015 April 27. Available from: https://www.gateshead.gov.uk/DocumentLibrary/council/consultation/Questionnaire-design-guidance-web.pdf.

2. Frary RB. A brief guide to questionnaire development. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University;2003.

3. Stehr-Green PA, Stehr-Green JK, Nelson A. Developing a questionnaire. FOCUS Field Epidemiol. 2003; 2(2):1–6.

4. Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16(2):234–243. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x.

5. Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications;2003.

6. Leung WC. How to design a questionnaire. Student BMJ. 2001; 9:187–189. DOI: 10.1136/sbmj.0106187.

7. Waltz C, Strickland OL, Lenz E. Measurement in nursing and health research. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company;2010.

8. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186–3191.

9. Corless IB, Nicholas PK, Nokes KM. Issues in cross-cultural quality-of-life research. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001; 33(1):15–20.

10. van de Vijver F, Poortinga YH. Testing in culturally heterogeneous populations: When are cultural loadings undesirable? Eur J Psychol Assess. 1992; 8(1):17–24.

11. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill;1994.

12. Knowles ES. Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 55(2):312–320. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.312.

13. Gibson D, Wermuth L, Sorensen JL, Menicucci L, Bernal G. Approval need in self-reports of addicts and family members. Int J Addict. 1987; 22(9):895–903.

14. Dijkstra W, Smit JH, Comijs HC. Using social desirability scales in research among the elderly. Qual Quant. 2001; 35(1):107–115. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004816210439.

15. Kim J, Kang JH, Kim S, Smith TW, Son J, Berktold J. Comparison between self-administered questionnaire and computer-assisted self-interview for supplemental survey nonresponse. Field Method. 2009; 22(1):57–69. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X09349925.

16. Mitchell ES. Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1986; 8(3):18–26.

17. Kimchi J, Polivka B, Stevenson JS. Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nurs Res. 1991; 40(6):364–366.