Ann Dermatol.  2012 Feb;24(1):22-25. 10.5021/ad.2012.24.1.22.

A Clinical Study of Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Contrast Media in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Dermatology, St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea. ivymyung@hanmail.net
  • 3Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The use of intravenous contrast media (CM) has increased for the diagnosis of several diseases. The newly developed low osmolar nonionic contrast agents cause significantly decreased adverse reactions than the higher osmolar ones. However, adverse reactions may still occur, ranging in severity from minor side effects to severe complications. However, there have been few reports about cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs) to nonionic monomer CM.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical features of CAR to intravenous nonionic monomer CM.
METHODS
A total 47,338 examinees underwent intravenous iodinated contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan using nonionic monomer CM. Among the adverse reactions to the CM, we divided them into cutaneous or noncutaneous and immediate (<1 hr) or late (> or =1 hr) adverse reactions.
RESULTS
Adverse reactions were noted in 62 cases out of the total 47,338 cases; 50 cases (80.7%) were categorized CARs. Among them, there were 24 male and 26 female patients. There was no significant difference between the sexes, and CARs occurred in all age groups. The highest occurrence was in the age range of 50~59 years. CARs included urticaria (78%), angioedema (10%), maculopapular rash (8%), erythema (2%), and pruritus without rash (2%). Immediate reactions were 92% (46 cases), while late reactions were 8% (4 cases).
CONCLUSION
CARs to nonionic monomer CM accounted for most of the adverse reactions (80.7%) and urticaria was the most common.

Keyword

Contrast media; CT; Cutaneous adverse reaction

MeSH Terms

Angioedema
Contrast Media
Erythema
Exanthema
Female
Humans
Korea
Male
Pruritus
Urticaria
Contrast Media

Cited by  2 articles

Analysis of Dermatologic Diseases in Neurosurgical In-Patients: A Retrospective Study of 463 Cases
Kyung Min Kim, Hei Sung Kim, Jeesuk Yu, Jong Tae Kim, Sang Hyun Cho
Ann Dermatol. 2016;28(3):314-320.    doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.314.

Immediate and nonimmediate reactions induced by contrast media: incidence, severity and risk factors
Martín Bedolla-Barajas, Dante D Hernández-Colín, Jaime Morales-Romero, Carlos Serrano-Salinas
Asia Pac Allergy. 2013;3(4):241-248.    doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.4.241.


Reference

1. Bush WH, Swanson DP. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991. 157:1153–1161.
2. Christiansen C, Pichler WJ, Skotland T. Delayed allergy-like reactions to X-ray contrast media: mechanistic considerations. Eur Radiol. 2000. 10:1965–1975.
Article
3. Brockow K, Christiansen C, Kanny G, Clément O, Barbaud A, Bircher A, et al. ENDA. EAACI interest group on drug hypersensitivity. Management of hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media. Allergy. 2005. 60:150–158.
Article
4. Maddox TG. Adverse reactions to contrast material: recognition, prevention, and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2002. 66:1229–1234.
Article
5. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990. 175:621–628.
Article
6. Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001. 176:1385–1388.
Article
7. Mortelé KJ, Oliva MR, Ondategui S, Ros PR, Silverman SG. Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005. 184:31–34.
Article
8. Wang CL, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Caoili EM, Wang G, Francis IR. Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008. 191:409–415.
Article
9. Meth MJ, Maibach HI. Current understanding of contrast media reactions and implications for clinical management. Drug Saf. 2006. 29:133–141.
Article
10. Kim SS, Park CH, Park MJ, Choi SH, Kim YS, Park HW, et al. Adverse reactions to radio-contrast media in computed tomography (CT) in general population: incidence and clinical features. Korean J Asthma Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007. 27:157–161.
Article
11. Morcos SK, Thomsen HS. Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol. 2001. 11:1267–1275.
Article
12. Wendt-Nordahl G, Rotert H, Trojan L, Michel MS, Peters CR, Alken P, et al. Intravenous contrast media in uroradiology: evaluation of safety and tolerability in almost 50,000 patients. Med Princ Pract. 2006. 15:358–361.
Article
13. Pedersen SH, Svaland MG, Reiss AL, Andrew E. Late allergy-like reactions following vascular administration of radiography contrast media. Acta Radiol. 1998. 39:344–348.
Article
14. Hosoya T, Yamaguchi K, Akutsu T, Mitsuhashi Y, Kondo S, Sugai Y, et al. Delayed adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media and their risk factors. Radiat Med. 2000. 18:39–45.
Article
15. Yoshikawa H. Late adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media. Radiology. 1992. 183:737–740.
Article
16. Laroche D, Aimone-Gastin I, Dubois F, Huet H, Gérard P, et al. Mechanisms of severe, immediate reactions to iodinated contrast material. Radiology. 1998. 209:183–190.
Article
17. Mita H, Tadokoro K, Akiyama K. Detection of IgE antibody to a radiocontrast medium. Allergy. 1998. 53:1133–1140.
Article
18. Kvedariene V, Martins P, Rouanet L, Demoly P. Diagnosis of iodinated contrast media hypersensitivity: results of a 6-year period. Clin Exp Allergy. 2006. 36:1072–1077.
Article
19. Brockow K, Becker EW, Worret WI, Ring J. Late skin test reactions to radiocontrast medium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999. 104:1107–1108.
Article
20. Delgado-Jimenez Y, Perez-Gala S, Aragüés M, Sanchez-Perez J, Garcia-Diez A. Late skin reaction to iodixanol (Visipaque): clinical manifestations, patch test study, and histopathological evaluation. Contact Dermatitis. 2006. 55:348–353.
21. Kanny G, Pichler W, Morisset M, Franck P, Marie B, Kohler C, et al. T cell-mediated reactions to iodinated contrast media: evaluation by skin and lymphocyte activation tests. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005. 115:179–185.
22. Lasser EC, Berry CC, Talner LB, Santini LC, Lang EK, Gerber FH, et al. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med. 1987. 317:845–849.
23. Greenberger P, Patterson R, Kelly J, Stevenson DD, Simon D, Lieberman P. Administration of radiographic contrast media in high-risk patients. Invest Radiol. 1980. 15:6 Suppl. S40–S43.
24. Wolf GL, Mishkin MM, Roux SG, Halpern EF, Gottlieb J, Zimmerman J, et al. Comparison of the rates of adverse drug reactions. Ionic contrast agents, ionic agents combined with steroids, and nonionic agents. Invest Radiol. 1991. 26:404–410.
Article
25. Thomsen HS, Bush WH Jr. Adverse effects of contrast media: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf. 1998. 19:313–324.
Article
26. Lasser EC, Berry CC, Mishkin MM, Williamson B, Zheutlin N, Silverman JM. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent adverse reactions to nonionic contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994. 162:523–526.
Article
27. Greenberger PA, Patterson R. The prevention of immediate generalized reactions to radiocontrast media in high-risk patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991. 87:867–872.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr